Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare

Alicia O'Cathain, Liz Croot, Edward Duncan, Nikki Rousseau, Katie Sworn, Katrina M Turner, Lucy Yardley, Pat Hoddinott, Alicia O'Cathain, Liz Croot, Edward Duncan, Nikki Rousseau, Katie Sworn, Katrina M Turner, Lucy Yardley, Pat Hoddinott

Abstract

Objective: To provide researchers with guidance on actions to take during intervention development.

Summary of key points: Based on a consensus exercise informed by reviews and qualitative interviews, we present key principles and actions for consideration when developing interventions to improve health. These include seeing intervention development as a dynamic iterative process, involving stakeholders, reviewing published research evidence, drawing on existing theories, articulating programme theory, undertaking primary data collection, understanding context, paying attention to future implementation in the real world and designing and refining an intervention using iterative cycles of development with stakeholder input throughout.

Conclusion: Researchers should consider each action by addressing its relevance to a specific intervention in a specific context, both at the start and throughout the development process.

Keywords: guidance; health; intervention development.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Logic model for intervention development.

References

    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Edwardson CL, Yates T, Biddle SJH, et al. . Effectiveness of the stand more at (smart) work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2018;22 10.1136/bmj.k3870
    1. Hoddinott P. A new era for intervention development studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2015;1:1–4. 10.1186/s40814-015-0032-0
    1. Bleijenberg N, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Trappenburg JCA, et al. . Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: enriching the development phase of the medical Research Council (MRC) framework. Int J Nurs Stud 2018;79:86–93. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001
    1. Bartholomew Eldredge LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, et al. . . : Planning health promotion programmes: an intervention mapping approach. 3rd ed San Francisco, CA, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
    1. O’Cathain A, Croot L, Sworn K, et al. . Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019;5.
    1. Turner KM, Rousseau N, Croot L, et al. . Understanding successful development of complex health and healthcare interventions and its drivers from the perspective of developers and wider stakeholders: an international qualitative interview study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e028756 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028756
    1. Garba RM, Gadanya MA. The role of intervention mapping in designing disease prevention interventions: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174438 10.1371/journal.pone.0174438
    1. Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, et al. . What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014650 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650
    1. Dalgetty R, Miller CB, Dombrowski SU. Examining the theory‐effectiveness hypothesis: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Br J Health Psychol 2019;24:334–56. 10.1111/bjhp.12356
    1. W K Kellogg Foundation Logic model development guide, 2004. Available: [Accessed 30 Nov 2018].
    1. INVOLVE Guidance on co-producing a research project, 2018. Available: [Accessed 30 Nov 2018].
    1. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, et al. . Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:228–38. 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627
    1. Rogers PJ. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation 2008;14:29–48. 10.1177/1356389007084674
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. . Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258 10.1136/bmj.h1258
    1. Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ. A description of think Aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res 1993;3:430–41. 10.1177/104973239300300403
    1. Craig P, Di Ruggiero E, Frohlich K, et al. . Taking account of context in population health intervention research: guidance for producers, users and funders of research. Southampton: NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, 2018.
    1. Moore GF, Evans RE, Hawkins J, et al. . From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation. Evaluation 2019;25:23–45. 10.1177/1356389018803219
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687 10.1136/bmj.g1687

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever