Directed evolution of an LBP/CD14 inhibitory peptide and its anti-endotoxin activity

Li Fang, Zhi Xu, Guan-song Wang, Fu-yun Ji, Chun-xia Mei, Juan Liu, Guo-ming Wu, Li Fang, Zhi Xu, Guan-song Wang, Fu-yun Ji, Chun-xia Mei, Juan Liu, Guo-ming Wu

Abstract

Background: LPS-binding protein (LBP) and its ligand CD14 are located upstream of the signaling pathway for LPS-induced inflammation. Blocking LBP and CD14 binding might prevent LPS-induced inflammation. In previous studies, we obtained a peptide analog (MP12) for the LBP/CD14 binding site and showed that this peptide analog had anti-endotoxin activity. In this study, we used in vitro directed evolution for this peptide analog to improve its in vivo and in vitro anti-endotoxin activity.

Methods: We used error-prone PCR (ep-PCR) and induced mutations in the C-terminus of LBP and attached the PCR products to T7 phages to establish a mutant phage display library. The positive clones that competed with LBP for CD14 binding was obtained by screening. We used both in vivo and in vitro experiments to compare the anti-endotoxin activities of a polypeptide designated P1 contained in a positive clone and MP12.

Results: 11 positive clones were obtained from among target phages. Sequencing showed that 9 positive clones had a threonine (T) to methionine (M) mutation in amino acid 287 of LBP. Compared to polypeptide MP12, polypeptide P1 significantly inhibited LPS-induced TNF-α expression and NF-κB activity in U937 cells (P<0.05). Compared to MP12, P1 significantly improved arterial oxygen pressure, an oxygenation index, and lung pathology scores in LPS-induced ARDS rats (P<0.05).

Conclusion: By in vitro directed evolution of peptide analogs for the LBP/CD14 binding site, we established a new polypeptide (P1) with a threonine (T)-to-methionine (M) mutation in amino acid 287 of LBP. This polypeptide had high anti-endotoxin activity in vitro and in vivo, which suggested that amino acid 287 in the C-terminus of LBP may play an important role in LBP binding with CD14.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Establishing the LBP mutant phase…
Figure 1. Establishing the LBP mutant phase library.
A. The first and second lanes are the PCR products obtained after annealing at 59°C. The third and fourth lanes are the PCR products obtained after annealing at 57°C and these were collected. B. Restriction enzyme digestion after ligation of the PCR products with PTA2. The target band appeared in the 777-bp fragment (lane 1).
Figure 2. Chemiluminescence assay for phage binding…
Figure 2. Chemiluminescence assay for phage binding activity with CD14.
A. The luminescent particles were single clones with binding activity (3 independent experiments done in duplicate). A1–3, and B1–3 to H16–18 (3 independent experiments done in duplicate) were for samples 1 to 48, respectively. B. Chemiluminescence plate in (A). Corresponding single clone numbers and binding activity status. “+” indicates binding activity, “−” indicates no binding activity.
Figure 3. Chemiluminescent detection of competitive inhibition…
Figure 3. Chemiluminescent detection of competitive inhibition of LBP binding to CD14 by phage clones.
A. Non-luminescent particles indicated clones with competitive binding capacity. B. Number of single clones corresponding to the chemiluminescence plate labels and their competitive inhibition status. “+” indicates competition with LBP, “−” indicates no competition.
Figure 4. Effects of polypeptides P1 and…
Figure 4. Effects of polypeptides P1 and MP12 on LPS-induced TNF-α mRNA expression and secretion by U937 cells.
A. Agarose gel electrophoresis results for TNF-α mRNA expression by RT-PCR. B. The optical density ratio for target gene/β-actin was determined. Results are means ± standard deviations. C. Cell culture supernatant was used to detect the concentration of TNF-α(with ELISA) ▴ compared with the control: P compared with P1 treatment: P<0.05; ▵ compared with P1 treatment:P<0.01.
Figure 5. Effects of P1 and MP12…
Figure 5. Effects of P1 and MP12 on NF-κB activity in U937 cells.
A. NF-κB binding was significantly increased by LPS treatment. After treatment with P1 or MP12, NF-κB binding decreased; a more significant decrease was found with P1 treatment compared to MP12 treatment. B. IOD values were obtained using TotalLab Quant software. ▴ compared with the control: P compared with P1 group: P<0.05.
Figure 6. Effects of P1 and MP12…
Figure 6. Effects of P1 and MP12 on LPS rat arterial blood gas analysis.
PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 decreased significantly in the LPS group compared to the normal group; with LPS, these were 60 mmHg and >300 mmHg, respectively. The outcome was better in the P1 group compared to the MP12 group. ▴ compared with the control group: P

Figure 7. Pathological evaluations and scoring of…

Figure 7. Pathological evaluations and scoring of rat lung tissues.

I. Rat lung tissue under…

Figure 7. Pathological evaluations and scoring of rat lung tissues.
I. Rat lung tissue under a light microscope. A. Rat lung tissue had a relatively complete structure in the normal control group. B. Rat lung tissue in rats with LPS-induced injury. C. Rat lung tissue in P1 group. D. Rat lung tissue in MP12 group. Edema: black arrow; congestion: white arrow; inflammatory cell infiltration: gray arrow. II. Pathological scoring for lung tissue:(the scores of control group is zero) ▴compared with the LPS group: P
All figures (7)
Similar articles
References
    1. Danner RL, Elin RJ, Hosseini JM, Wesley RA, Reilly JM, et al. (1991) Endotoxemia in human septic shock. Chest 99: 169–175. - PubMed
    1. Heumann D, Lauener R, Ryffel B (2003) The dual role of LBP and CD14 in response to Gram-negative bacteria or Gram-negative compounds. Journal of Endotoxin Research 9: 381–384. - PubMed
    1. Wright SD, Ramos RA, Tobias PS, Ulevitch RJ, Mathison JC (1990) CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 249: 1431–1433. - PubMed
    1. Martin TR, Mongovin SM, Tobias PS, Mathison JC, Moriarty AM, et al. (1994) The CD14 differentiation antigen mediates the development of endotoxin responsiveness during differentiation of mononuclear phagocytes. J Leukoc Biol 56: 1–9. - PubMed
    1. Schumann RR (1992) Function of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) and CD14, the receptor for LPS/LBP complexes: a short review. Res Immunol 143: 11–15. - PubMed
Show all 36 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grant support
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30971189,81070053). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 7. Pathological evaluations and scoring of…
Figure 7. Pathological evaluations and scoring of rat lung tissues.
I. Rat lung tissue under a light microscope. A. Rat lung tissue had a relatively complete structure in the normal control group. B. Rat lung tissue in rats with LPS-induced injury. C. Rat lung tissue in P1 group. D. Rat lung tissue in MP12 group. Edema: black arrow; congestion: white arrow; inflammatory cell infiltration: gray arrow. II. Pathological scoring for lung tissue:(the scores of control group is zero) ▴compared with the LPS group: P
All figures (7)

References

    1. Danner RL, Elin RJ, Hosseini JM, Wesley RA, Reilly JM, et al. (1991) Endotoxemia in human septic shock. Chest 99: 169–175.
    1. Heumann D, Lauener R, Ryffel B (2003) The dual role of LBP and CD14 in response to Gram-negative bacteria or Gram-negative compounds. Journal of Endotoxin Research 9: 381–384.
    1. Wright SD, Ramos RA, Tobias PS, Ulevitch RJ, Mathison JC (1990) CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 249: 1431–1433.
    1. Martin TR, Mongovin SM, Tobias PS, Mathison JC, Moriarty AM, et al. (1994) The CD14 differentiation antigen mediates the development of endotoxin responsiveness during differentiation of mononuclear phagocytes. J Leukoc Biol 56: 1–9.
    1. Schumann RR (1992) Function of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) and CD14, the receptor for LPS/LBP complexes: a short review. Res Immunol 143: 11–15.
    1. Le Roy D, Di Padova F, Tees R, Lengacher S, Landmann R, et al. (1999) Monoclonal antibodies to murine lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) protect mice from lethal endotoxemia by blocking either the binding of LPS to LBP or the presentation of LPS/LBP complexes to CD14. J Immunol 162: 7454–7460.
    1. Haziot A, Rong GW, Silver J, Goyert SM (1993) Recombinant soluble CD14 mediates the activation of endothelial cells by lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 151: 1500–1507.
    1. Wright SD, Tobias PS, Ulevitch RJ, Ramos RA (1989) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein opsonizes LPS-bearing particles for recognition by a novel receptor on macrophages. J Exp Med 170: 1231–1241.
    1. Parsons PE (2000) Mediators and mechanisms of acute lung injury. Clin Chest Med 21: 467–476.
    1. Hailman E, Lichenstein HS, Wurfel MM, Miller DS, Johnson DA, et al. (1994) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein accelerates the binding of LPS to CD14. J Exp Med 179: 269–277.
    1. Tobias PS, Tapping RI, Gegner JA (1999) Endotoxin interactions with lipopolysaccharide-responsive cells. Clin Infect Dis 28: 476–481.
    1. Wurfel MM, Kunitake ST, Lichenstein H, Kane JP, Wright SD (1994) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein is carried on lipoproteins and acts as a cofactor in the neutralization of LPS. J Exp Med 180: 1025–1035.
    1. Xu Z, Qian GS, Li Q, Feng QJ, Wu GM, et al. (2009) Screening of mimetic peptides for CD14 binding site with LBP and antiendotoxin activity of mimetic peptide in vivo and in vitro. Inflamm Res 58: 45–53.
    1. Stemmer WP (1994) DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 10747–10751.
    1. Chen K, Arnold FH (1993) Tuning the activity of an enzyme for unusual environments: sequential random mutagenesis of subtilisin E for catalysis in dimethylformamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 5618–5622.
    1. Taylor AH, Heavner G, Nedelman M, Sherris D, Brunt E, et al. (1995) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) neutralizing peptides reveal a lipid A binding site of LPS binding protein. J Biol Chem 270: 17934–17938.
    1. Lamping N, Hoess A, Yu B, Park TC, Kirschning CJ, et al. (1996) Effects of site-directed mutagenesis of basic residues (Arg 94, Lys 95, Lys 99) of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein on binding and transfer of LPS and subsequent immune cell activation. J Immunol 157: 4648–4656.
    1. Ulevitch RJ, Tobias PS (1995) Receptor-dependent mechanisms of cell stimulation by bacterial endotoxin. Annu Rev Immunol 13: 437–457.
    1. Theofan G, Horwitz AH, Williams RE, Liu PS, Chan I, et al. (1994) An amino-terminal fragment of human lipopolysaccharide-binding protein retains lipid A binding but not CD14-stimulatory activity. J Immunol 152: 3623–3629.
    1. Heumann D (2001) CD14 and LBP in endotoxemia and infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Endotoxin Research 7: 439–441.
    1. Su X, Wang L, Song Y, Bai C (2004) Inhibition of inflammatory responses by ambroxol, a mucolytic agent, in a murine model of acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide. Intensive Care Med 30: 133–140.
    1. Patel HJ, Belvisi MG, Bishop-Bailey D, Yacoub MH, Mitchell JA (2003) Activation of peroxsome proliferator- activated receptors in human airway smooth muscle cells has a superior anti-inflammatory profile to corticosteroids: relevance for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy. J Immunol 170: 2663–2669.
    1. Sohn EJ, Paape MJ, Bannerman DD, Connor EE, Fetterer RH, et al. (2007) Shedding of sCD14 by bovine neutrophils following activation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide results in down-regulation of IL-8. Veterinary Research 38: 95–108.
    1. Verbon A, Dekkers PE, ten Hove T, Hack CE, Pribble JP, et al. (2001) IC14, an anti-CD14 antibody, inhibits endotoxin-mediated symptoms and inflammatory responses in humans. J Immunol 166: 3599–3605.
    1. Kitchens RL, Thompson PA (2003) Impact of sepsis-induced changes in plasma on LPS interactions with monocytes and plasma lipoproteins: roles of soluble CD14, LBP, and acute phase lipoproteins. Journal of Endotoxin Research 9: 113–118.
    1. Olszyna DP, Verbon A, Pribble JP, Turner T, Axtelle T, et al. (2003) Effect of IC14, an anti-CD14 antibody, on plasma and cell-associated chemokines during human endotoxemia. Eur Cytokine Netw 14: 158–162.
    1. Arana Mde J, Vallespi MG, Chinea G, Vallespi GV, Rodriguez-Alonso I, et al. (2003) Inhibition of LPS-responses by synthetic peptides derived from LBP associates with the ability of the peptides to block LBP-LPS interaction. Journal of Endotoxin Research 9: 281–291.
    1. Zweigner J, Schumann RR, Weber JR (2006) The role of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in modulating the innate immune response. Microbes Infect 8: 946–952.
    1. Iovine N, Eastvold J, Elsbach P, Weiss JP, Gioannini TL (2002) The carboxyl-terminal domain of closely related endotoxin-binding proteins determines the target of protein-lipopolysaccharide complexes. J Biol Chem 277: 7970–7978.
    1. Stemmer WP (1994) Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 370: 389–391.
    1. Fortin PD, MacPherson I, Neau DB, Bolin JT, Eltis LD (2005) Directed evolution of a ring-cleaving dioxygenase for polychlorinated biphenyl degradation. J Biol Chem 280: 42307–42314.
    1. Arnold FH, Wintrode PL, Miyazaki K, Gershenson A (2001) How enzymes adapt: lessons from directed evolution. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 26: 100–106.
    1. Hardin AO, Meals EA, Yi T, Knapp KM, English BK (2006) SHP-1 inhibits LPS-mediated TNF and iNOS production in murine macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342: 547–555.
    1. Hristova M, Yordanov M, Ivanovska N (2003) Effect of fangchinoline in murine models of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and septic shock. Inflamm Res 52: 1–7.
    1. Zandi E, Chen Y, Karin M (1998) Direct phosphorylation of IkappaB by IKKalpha and IKKbeta: discrimination between free and NF-kappaB-bound substrate. Science 281: 1360–1363.
    1. Davis RJ (2000) Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell 103: 239–252.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever