TriMaster: randomised double-blind crossover study of a DPP4 inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitor and thiazolidinedione as second-line or third-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have suboptimal glycaemic control on metformin treatment with or without a sulfonylurea-a MASTERMIND study protocol

Catherine Angwin, Caroline Jenkinson, Angus Jones, Christopher Jennison, William Henley, Andrew Farmer, Naveed Sattar, Rury R Holman, Ewan Pearson, Beverley Shields, Andrew Hattersley, MASTERMIND consortium, Catherine Angwin, Caroline Jenkinson, Angus Jones, Christopher Jennison, William Henley, Andrew Farmer, Naveed Sattar, Rury R Holman, Ewan Pearson, Beverley Shields, Andrew Hattersley, MASTERMIND consortium

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmaceutical treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have increased to include multiple classes of oral glucose-lowering agents but without accompanying guidance on which of these may most benefit individual patients. Clinicians lack information for treatment intensification after first-line metformin therapy. Stratifying patients by simple clinical characteristics may improve care by targeting treatment options to those in whom they are most effective. This academically designed and run three-way crossover trial aims to test a stratification approach using three standard oral glucose-lowering agents.

Methods and analysis: TriMaster is a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial taking place at up to 25 clinical sites across England, Scotland and Wales. 520 patients with T2DM treated with either metformin alone, or metformin and a sulfonylurea who have glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >58 mmol/mol will be randomised to receive 16 weeks each of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and thiazolidinedione in random order. Participants will be assessed at the end of each treatment period, providing clinical and biochemical data, and their experience of side effects. Participant preference will be assessed on completion of all three treatments. The primary endpoint is HbA1c after 4 months of therapy (allowing a range of 12-18 weeks for analysis). Secondary endpoints include participant-reported preference between the three treatments, tolerability and prevalence of side effects.

Ethical approval: This study was approved by National Health Service Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee South Central-Oxford A, study 16/SC/0147. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant scientific meetings. A lay summary of results will be made available to all participants.

Trial registration numbers: 12039221; 2015-002790-38 and NCT02653209.

Keywords: clinical trials; diabetes & endocrinology; therapeutics.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: EP has received Honoraria from Lilly. NS has consulted for Amgen, Astrazeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Napp, NovoNordisk, Sanofi and Pfizer and received grant funding from Boehringer Ingelheim. RRH reports research support from AstraZeneca, Bayer and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and personal fees from Bayer, Intarcia, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work. CJ has consulted for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, NovoNordisk and Sanofi. WH has received grant funding from IQVIA and travel funds from Eisai.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TriMaster consort diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
TriMaster schedule of assessment. 1Where baseline visit takes place more than 2 weeks after screening visit, eligibility blood samples must be repeated. 2Optional procedure for participants at sites which have previously agreed to sample collection. 3Analysis performed on both visit 1 baseline and visit 1 mixed-meal tolerance test samples. Other analyses at visit 1 performed on baseline only. DTSQ, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; IMP, investigational medicinal product

References

    1. Qaseem A, Barry MJ, Humphrey LL, et al. . Oral pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:279–90. 10.7326/M16-1860
    1. Dennis JM, Henley WE, McGovern AP, et al. . Time trends in prescribing of type 2 diabetes drugs, glycaemic response and risk factors: a retrospective analysis of primary care data, 2010-2017. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:1576–84. 10.1111/dom.13687
    1. Pearson ER. Personalized medicine in diabetes: the role of 'omics' and biomarkers. Diabet Med 2016;33:712–7. 10.1111/dme.13075
    1. Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. . Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2018;61:2461–98. 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5
    1. Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM, et al. . Markers of β-cell failure predict poor glycemic response to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016;39:250–7. 10.2337/dc15-0258
    1. DeFronzo RA, Stonehouse AH, Han J, et al. . Relationship of baseline HbA1c and efficacy of current glucose-lowering therapies: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabet Med 2010;27:309–17. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02941.x
    1. Thong KY, McDonald TJ, Hattersley AT, et al. . The association between postprandial urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio and the treatment response to liraglutide: a multi-centre observational study. Diabet Med 2014;31:403–11. 10.1111/dme.12367
    1. Bihan H, Ng WL, Magliano DJ, et al. . Predictors of efficacy of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;121:27–34. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.08.011
    1. Dennis JM. Precision medicine in type 2 diabetes: using individualized prediction models to optimize selection of treatment. Diabetes. In Press 2020;69:2075–85. 10.2337/dbi20-0002
    1. Dennis JM, Henley WE, Weedon MN, et al. . Sex and BMI alter the benefits and risks of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes: a framework for evaluating stratification using routine clinical and individual trial data. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1844–53. 10.2337/dc18-0344
    1. Dennis JM, Shields BM, Hill AV, et al. . Precision medicine in type 2 diabetes: clinical markers of insulin resistance are associated with altered short- and long-term glycemic response to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy. Diabetes Care 2018;41:705–12. 10.2337/dc17-1827
    1. Rodgers L, ER. P, Hammersley S, et al. . Patients with a high fasting glucose respond better to sulphonylureas than dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors: a mastermind study. Diabet Med 2015;32.
    1. Viberti G, Kahn SE, Greene DA, et al. . A diabetes outcome progression trial (adopt): an international multicenter study of the comparative efficacy of rosiglitazone, glyburide, and metformin in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1737–43. 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1737
    1. Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2006;368:1696–705. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69705-5
    1. Tahrani AA, Barnett AH, Bailey CJ. Sglt inhibitors in management of diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013;1:140–51. 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70050-0
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Merck Sharp D. Summary of product characteristics: Januvia (sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate); electronic medicines compendium (EMC), 2020. Available:
    1. Napp Pharmaceuticals L Summary of product Characterstics: Invokana (canagliflozin hemihydrate); electronic medicines compendium (EMC), 2020. Available:
    1. Takeda Summary of product characteristics: Actos tablets, electronic medicines compendium (EMC), 2019. Available:
    1. WHO Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, 2011. Available:
    1. Lund SS, Tarnow L, Stehouwer CDA, et al. . Targeting hyperglycaemia with either metformin or repaglinide in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007;9:394–407. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00713.x
    1. Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, et al. . Consort 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4378. 10.1136/bmj.l4378

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever