Increasing access to institutional deliveries using demand and supply side incentives: early results from a quasi-experimental study

Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Peter Waiswa, M Hafizur Rahman, Fred Makumbi, Noah Kiwanuka, Olico Okui, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, John Bua, Aloysius Mutebi, Gorette Nalwadda, David Serwadda, George W Pariyo, David H Peters, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Peter Waiswa, M Hafizur Rahman, Fred Makumbi, Noah Kiwanuka, Olico Okui, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, John Bua, Aloysius Mutebi, Gorette Nalwadda, David Serwadda, George W Pariyo, David H Peters

Abstract

Background: Geographical inaccessibility, lack of transport, and financial burdens are some of the demand side constraints to maternal health services in Uganda, while supply side problems include poor quality services related to unmotivated health workers and inadequate supplies. Most public health interventions in Uganda have addressed only selected supply side issues, and universities have focused their efforts on providing maternal services at tertiary hospitals. To demonstrate how reforms at Makerere University College of Health Sciences (MakCHS) can lead to making systemic changes that can improve maternal health services, a demand and supply side strategy was developed by working with local communities and national stakeholders.

Methods: This quasi-experimental trial is conducted in two districts in Eastern Uganda. The supply side component includes health worker refresher training and additions of minimal drugs and supplies, whereas the demand side component involves vouchers given to pregnant women for motorcycle transport and the payment to service providers for antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care. The trial is ongoing, but early analysis from routine health information systems on the number of services used is presented.

Results: Motorcyclists in the community organized themselves to accept vouchers in exchange for transport for antenatal care, deliveries and postnatal care, and have become actively involved in ensuring that women obtain care. Increases in antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care were demonstrated, with the number of safe deliveries in the intervention area immediately jumping from <200 deliveries/month to over 500 deliveries/month in the intervention arm. Voucher revenues have been used to obtain needed supplies to improve quality and to pay health workers, ensuring their availability at a time when workloads are increasing.

Conclusions: Transport and service vouchers appear to be a viable strategy for rapidly increasing maternal care. MakCHS can design strategies together with stakeholders using a learning-by-doing approach to take advantage of community resources.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of first antenatal care visits per month in the intervention and control areas. Source: Health facility information system Pilot period begins December 2009; full implementation under revised scheme began in June 2010
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of deliveries in health facilities per month in the intervention and control areas. Source: Health facility information system Pilot period begins December 2009; full implementation under revised scheme began in June 2010
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of first postnatal care visits per month in the intervention and control areas. Source: Health facility information system (postnatal record keeping began December 2009) Pilot period begins December 2009; full implementation under revised scheme began in Junel 2010.

References

    1. Uganda Bureau Of Statistics. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro; 2006.
    1. Graham WJ, Bell JS, Bullough CHW, editor. Can skilled attendance at delivery reduce maternal mortality in developing countries. Antwerp: ITG Press; 2001.
    1. Sibbald B. Ugandan government resolves to make safe motherhood a priority. CMAJ. 2007;177(3):244–5.
    1. Amooti B. Factors influencing choice of delivery sites by pregnant mothers in Rakai district. Uganda, Kampala: Makerere University School of Public Health; 1997.
    1. Atuyambe L, Mirembe F, Johansson A, Kirumira EK, Faxelid E. Experiences of pregnant adolescents--voices from Wakiso district, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2005;5(4):304–9.
    1. Waiswa P, Kemigisa M, Kiguli J, Naikoba S, Pariyo GW, Peterson S. Acceptability of evidence-based neonatal care practices in rural Uganda - implications for programming. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-21. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-21.
    1. Munaaba E. Factors which influence mothers choice of location of child birth in Pallisa district, Uganda. Kampala, Uganda: Makerere University School of Public Health; 1995.
    1. McParke BD, Asiimwe D. Informal economic activities of public health workers in Uganda: implications for quality and accessibility of care. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(7):849–65. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00144-6.
    1. Kiguli J, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Okui O, Mutebi A, MacGregor H, Pariyo GW. Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009;3:77–85.
    1. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(2):69–79. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh009.
    1. Ensor T, Ronoh J. Effective financing of maternal health services: a review of the literature. Health Policy. 2005;75(1):49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.02.002.
    1. Peters DH, Garg A, Bloom G, Walker DG, Brieger WR, Rahman MH. Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161–171. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.011.
    1. Ensor T. Consumer-led demand side financing in health and education and its relevance for low and middle income countries. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004;19(3):267–85. doi: 10.1002/hpm.762.
    1. Gwatkin DR, Bhuiya A, Victora CG. Making health systems more equitable. Lancet. 2004;364(9441):1273–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17145-6.
    1. Jacobs B, Price N. Improving access for the poorest to public sector health services: insights from Kirivong Operational Health District in Cambodia. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(1):27–39. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czj001.
    1. Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N. Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(16):1900–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.16.1900.
    1. Pearson M. Demand side financing for health care. London: DFID health systems resource centre; 2001.
    1. Meuwissen LE, Gorter AC. Does a competitive voucher program for adolescents improve the quality of reproductive health care? A simulated patient study in Nicaragua. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(204) doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-204.
    1. Mushi AK, Schellenberg JR. Targeted subsidy for malaria control with treated nets using a discount voucher system in Tanzania. Health Policy Plan. 2003;18(2):163–71. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czg021.
    1. Iqbal A, Rasheed S, Hanifi SMA, Bhuiya A. Reaching the poor with performance based payment for safe delivery services in rural Bangaldesh. Bulletin von Medicus Mundl Schwelz. 2009. p. 112.
    1. Bhatia MR, Yesudian CAK, Gorter A, Thankappan KR. Demand Side Financing for Reproductive and Child Health Services in India. Economic and Political Weekly. 2006;41(3):279–284.
    1. Worrall E, Hill J, Webster J, Mortimer J. Experience of targeting subsidies on insecticide-treated nets: what do we know and what are the knowledge gaps? Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10(1):19–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01355.x.
    1. Pariyo GW, Mayora C, Okui O, Ssengooba F, Peters DH, Serwadda D, Lucas H, Bloom G, Rahman MH, Ekirapa-Kiracho E. Exploring new health markets: Experiences from informal providers of transport for maternal health services in Eastern Uganda. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2011;11(Suppl 1):S10.
    1. Campbell MR, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.
    1. Villar J. et al.Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;4:CD000934.
    1. Carroli G. et al.WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357(9268):1565–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04723-1.
    1. Villar J. et al.WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357(9268):1551–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X.
    1. Carroli G, Rooney C, Villar J. How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(Suppl 1):1–42.
    1. Darmstadt GL. et al.Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet. 2005;365(9463):977–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6.
    1. Hofmeyr GJ. et al.Obstetric care in low-resource settings: what, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(Suppl 1):S21–S44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.017.
    1. Bennett S, Ssengooba F. Closing the gaps: from science to action in maternal, newborn, and child health in Africa. PLoS Med. 2010;7(6):e1000298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000298.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever