Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation

Y Gavrieli, Y Sherman, S A Ben-Sasson, Y Gavrieli, Y Sherman, S A Ben-Sasson

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) plays a key role in developmental biology and in maintenance of the steady state in continuously renewing tissues. Currently, its existence is inferred mainly from gel electrophoresis of a pooled DNA extract as PCD was shown to be associated with DNA fragmentation. Based on this observation, we describe here the development of a method for the in situ visualization of PCD at the single-cell level, while preserving tissue architecture. Conventional histological sections, pretreated with protease, were nick end labeled with biotinylated poly dU, introduced by terminal deoxy-transferase, and then stained using avidin-conjugated peroxidase. The reaction is specific, only nuclei located at positions where PCD is expected are stained. The initial screening includes: small and large intestine, epidermis, lymphoid tissues, ovary, and other organs. A detailed analysis revealed that the process is initiated at the nuclear periphery, it is relatively short (1-3 h from initiation to cell elimination) and that PCD appears in tissues in clusters. The extent of tissue-PCD revealed by this method is considerably greater than apoptosis detected by nuclear morphology, and thus opens the way for a variety of studies.

References

    1. Biochem Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;68(9):1071-4
    1. New Biol. 1991 Feb;3(2):103-9
    1. Liver. 1988 Apr;8(2):80-7
    1. Br J Cancer. 1972 Aug;26(4):239-57
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Dec;75(2):307-13
    1. J Immunol. 1984 Jan;132(1):38-42
    1. Science. 1983 Jun 17;220(4603):1277-9
    1. J Theor Biol. 1982 Aug 21;97(4):591-602
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5579-83
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 1991 Jul;97(1):111-4
    1. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1097-8
    1. J Immunol. 1990 May 1;144(9):3326-33
    1. Cancer Res. 1991 Feb 15;51(4):1078-85
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1991 Aug;21(8):1951-8
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1990 Apr;20(4):779-84
    1. Immunol Today. 1990 Apr;11(4):116-9
    1. Immunol Today. 1990 Apr;11(4):120-1
    1. FASEB J. 1989 May;3(7):1843-9
    1. Immunol Today. 1989 Mar;10(3):79-86
    1. Dev Biol. 1988 Jun;127(2):362-7
    1. Biol Reprod. 1988 Jun;38(5):1181-8
    1. Am J Pathol. 1972 Oct;69(1):103-18
    1. Nature. 1980 Apr 10;284(5756):555-6
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6361-5
    1. J Pathol. 1984 Jan;142(1):67-77
    1. Int Rev Cytol. 1980;68:251-306
    1. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 Jan 20;192(1107):241-55
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1991 Aug;195(2):323-9
    1. J Immunol Methods. 1991 Jun 3;139(2):271-9
    1. Cell. 1991 Nov 1;67(3):629-39
    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989 Feb 15;269(1):365-70

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever