Reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers of low socioeconomic status: study protocol for a randomized control trial

Nicolle M Krebs, Sophia I Allen, Susan Veldheer, Diane J Martinez, Kimberly Horn, Craig Livelsberger, Jennifer Modesto, Robin Kuprewicz, Ashley Wilhelm, Shari Hrabovsky, Abid Kazi, Alyse Fazzi, Jason Liao, Junjia Zhu, Emily Wasserman, Samantha M Reilly, Lisa Reinhart, Neil Trushin, Robinn E Moyer, Rebecca Bascom, Jonathan Foulds, John P Richie Jr, Joshua E Muscat, Nicolle M Krebs, Sophia I Allen, Susan Veldheer, Diane J Martinez, Kimberly Horn, Craig Livelsberger, Jennifer Modesto, Robin Kuprewicz, Ashley Wilhelm, Shari Hrabovsky, Abid Kazi, Alyse Fazzi, Jason Liao, Junjia Zhu, Emily Wasserman, Samantha M Reilly, Lisa Reinhart, Neil Trushin, Robinn E Moyer, Rebecca Bascom, Jonathan Foulds, John P Richie Jr, Joshua E Muscat

Abstract

Background: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over the regulation of all tobacco products, including their nicotine content. Under this act, a major strategy to reduce harm from cigarette tobacco is lowering the nicotine content without causing unintended adverse consequences. Initial research on reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes has shown that smokers of these cigarettes gradually decrease their smoking frequency and biomarkers of exposure. The effectiveness of this strategy needs to be demonstrated in different populations whose response to RNC cigarettes might be substantially mediated by personal or environmental factors, such as low socioeconomic status (SES) populations. This study aims to evaluate the response to a reduced nicotine intervention in low SES smokers, as defined here as those with less than 16 years of education, by switching smokers from high nicotine commercial cigarettes to RNC cigarettes.

Methods/design: Adults (N = 280) who have smoked five cigarettes or more per day for the past year, have not made a quit attempt in the prior month, are not planning to quit, and have less than 16 years of education are recruited into a two-arm, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. First, participants smoke their usual brand of cigarettes for 1 week and SPECTRUM research cigarettes containing a usual amount of nicotine for 2 weeks. During the experimental phase, participants are randomized to continue smoking SPECTRUM research cigarettes that contain either (1) usual nicotine content (UNC) (11.6 mg/cigarette) or (2) RNC (11.6 to 0.2 mg/cigarette) over 18 weeks. During the final phase of the study, all participants are offered the choice to quit smoking with nicotine replacement therapy, continue smoking the research cigarettes, or return to their usual brand of cigarettes. The primary outcomes of the study include retention rates and compliance with using only research cigarettes and no use of other nicotine-containing products. Secondary outcomes are tobacco smoke biomarkers, nicotine dependence measures, smoking topography, stress levels, and adverse health consequences.

Discussion: Results from this study will provide information on whether low SES smokers can maintain a course of progressive nicotine reduction without increases in incidence of adverse effects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01928719 . Registered on 21 August 2013.

Keywords: Cigarettes; Cotinine; Education; Randomized controlled trial; Reduced nicotine content cigarettes; Smoking; Socioeconomic status; Tobacco; Tobacco control.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SPIRIT diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Participants are instructed to keep their daily cigarette log attached to their cigarette pack by folding the top of the log at the line and tucking the flap into the pack

References

    1. Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(2):123–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310212.
    1. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Health. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act: hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, on H.R. 1108, October 3, 2007. Washington, DC: US GPO: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., US GPO; 2008.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. . Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General. In: How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2010.
    1. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Tobacco and Socioeconomic Status. In: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Washington, DC: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids; 2015.
    1. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafo M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x.
    1. Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM. Current cigarette smoking among adults — United States, 2005–2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (MMWR) 2016;65:1205–11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
    1. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT. Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(6):809–19. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00191-8.
    1. Lakka TA, Kauhanen J, Salonen JT. Conditioning leisure time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in sociodemographic groups of middle-aged men in eastern Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(1):86–93. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.1.86.
    1. Martikainen P, Brunner E, Marmot M. Socioeconomic differences in dietary patterns among middle-aged men and women. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(7):1397–410. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00137-5.
    1. Lantz PM, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Williams DR, Mero RP, Chen J. Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1703–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.21.1703.
    1. Reid JL, Hammond D, Boudreau C, Fong GT, Siahpush M. Socioeconomic disparities in quit intentions, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence among smokers in four western countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(suppl 1):S20–33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq051.
    1. Franks P, Jerant AF, Leigh JP, Lee D, Chiem A, Lewis I, Lee S. Cigarette prices, smoking, and the poor: implications of recent trends. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1873–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.090134.
    1. Droomers M, Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP. Educational differences in the intention to stop smoking: explanations based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14(2):194–8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.2.194.
    1. Dotinga A, Schrijvers CTM, Voorham AJJ, Mackenbach JP. Correlates of stages of change of smoking among inhabitants of deprived neighbourhoods. Eur J Pub Health. 2005;15(2):152–9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki112.
    1. Stronks K, van de Mheen HD, Looman CWN, Mackenbach JP. Cultural, material, and psychosocial correlates of the socioeconomic gradient in smoking behavior among adults. Prev Med. 1997;26(5):754–66. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0174.
    1. Manfredi C, Cho YI, Crittenden KS, Dolecek TA. A path model of smoking cessation in women smokers of low socio-economic status. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(5):747–56. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl155.
    1. Sorensen G, Emmons K, Stoddard AM, Linnan L, Avrunin J. Do social influences contribute to occupational differences in quitting smoking and attitudes toward quitting? Am J Health Promot. 2002;16(3):135–41. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-16.3.135.
    1. Mariël D. Why do lower educated people continue smoking? Explanations from the longitudinal GLOBE study. Health Psychol. 2002;21(3):263–72. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.21.3.263.
    1. Moolchan ET, Fagan P, Fernander AF, Velicer WF, Hayward MD, King G, Clayton RR. Addressing tobacco-related health disparities. Addiction. 2007;102:30–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01953.x.
    1. Roddy E, Antoniak M, Britton J, Molyneux A, Lewis S. Barriers and motivators to gaining access to smoking cessation services amongst deprived smokers — a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):147. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-147.
    1. Nesbitt PD. Smoking, physiological arousal, and emotional response. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1973;25(1):137–44. doi: 10.1037/h0034256.
    1. Pomerleau CS, Pomerleau OF. The effects of a psychological stressor on cigarette smoking and subsequent behavioral and physiological responses. Psychophysiology. 1987;24(3):278–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00295.x.
    1. Perkins KA, Grobe JE, Fonte C, Breus M. "Paradoxical" effects of smoking on subjective stress versus cardiovascular arousal in males and females. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992;42(2):301–11. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90531-J.
    1. Parrott AC. Stress modulation over the day in cigarette smokers. Addiction. 1995;90(2):233–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb01041.x.
    1. Steptoe A, Ussher M. Smoking, cortisol and nicotine. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;59(3):228–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.011.
    1. Hajek P, Taylor T, McRobbie H. The effect of stopping smoking on perceived stress levels. Addiction. 2010;105(8):1466–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02979.x.
    1. Kirschbaum C, Wüst S, Strasburger CJ. ‘Normal’ cigarette smoking increases free cortisol in habitual smokers. Life Sci. 1992;50(6):435–42. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(92)90378-3.
    1. Mendelson JH, Sholar MB, Goletiani N, Siegel AJ, Mello NK. Effects of low- and high-nicotine cigarette smoking on mood states and the HPA axis in men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30(9):1751–63. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300753.
    1. Dowd JB, Simanek AM, Aiello AE. Socio-economic status, cortisol and allostatic load: a review of the literature. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(5):1297–309. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp277.
    1. Steptoe A, Ayers S. The Sage handbook of health psychology. London: Sage; 2004. Stress, health and illness; pp. 169–96.
    1. Benowitz NL, Jacob P, 3rd, Herrera B. Nicotine intake and dose response when smoking reduced-nicotine content cigarettes. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80(6):703–14. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2006.09.007.
    1. Benowitz NL, Hall SM, Stewart S, Wilson M, Dempsey D, Jacob P., 3rd Nicotine and carcinogen exposure with smoking of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarette. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(11):2479–85. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0393.
    1. Benowitz NL, Dains KM, Hall SM, Stewart S, Wilson M, Dempsey D, Jacob P., 3rd Progressive commercial cigarette yield reduction: biochemical exposure and behavioral assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(3):876–83. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0731.
    1. Benowitz NL, Dains KM, Hall SM, Stewart S, Wilson M, Dempsey D, Jacob P., 3rd Smoking behavior and exposure to tobacco toxicants during 6 months of smoking progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(5):761–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0644.
    1. Donny EC, Denlinger RL, Tidey JW, Koopmeiners JS, Benowitz NL, Vandrey RG, al'Absi M, Carmella SG, Cinciripini PM, Dermody SS, et al. Randomized trial of reduced-nicotine standards for cigarettes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1340–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1502403.
    1. Hatsukami DK, Kotlyar M, Hertsgaard LA, Zhang Y, Carmella SG, Jensen JA, Allen SS, Shields PG, Murphy SE, Stepanov I, Hecht SS. Reduced nicotine content cigarettes: effects on toxicant exposure, dependence and cessation. Addiction. 2010;105(2):343–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02780.x.
    1. Hammond D, O'Connor RJ. Reduced nicotine cigarettes: smoking behavior and biomarkers of exposure among smokers not intending to quit. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(10):2032–40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0957.
    1. Benowitz NL, Nardone N, Hatsukami DK, Donny EC. Biochemical estimation of noncompliance with smoking of very low nicotine content cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(2):331–5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1040.
    1. Strasser AA, Lerman C, Sanborn PM, Pickworth WB, Feldman EA. New lower nicotine cigarettes can produce compensatory smoking and increased carbon monoxide exposure. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86(2–3):294–300. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.017.
    1. Aubin HJ, Farley A, Lycett D, Lahmek P, Aveyard P. Weight gain in smokers after quitting cigarettes: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4439.
    1. Harris JE. Incomplete compensation does not imply reduced harm: yields of 40 smoke toxicants per milligram nicotine in regular filter versus low-tar cigarettes in the 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(5):797–807. doi: 10.1080/1462220042000274266.
    1. Donny EC, Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, Sved AF, Tidey JW, Cassidy RN. Reduced nicotine product standards for combustible tobacco: building an empirical basis for effective regulation. Prev Med. 2014;68:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.020.
    1. Mercincavage M, Souprountchouk V, Tang KZ, Dumont RL, Wileyto EP, Carmella SG, Hecht SS, Strasser AA. A randomized controlled trial of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes on smoking behaviors, biomarkers of exposure, and subjective ratings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(7):1125–33. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1088.
    1. Benowttz NL, Hall SM, Herning RI, Jacob PI, Jones RT, Osman A-L. Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(3):139–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198307213090303.
    1. Benowitz NL, Iii PJ. Daily intake of nicotine during cigarette smoking. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984;35(4):499–504. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.67.
    1. Kozlowski LT, Pillitteri JL, Sweeney CT. Misuse of "light" cigarettes by means of vent blocking. J Subst Abuse. 1994;6(3):333–6. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3289(94)90524-X.
    1. Kozlowski LT, Rickert WS, Pope MA, Robinson JC, Frecker RC. Estimating the yield to smokers of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide from the 'lowest yield' ventilated filter-cigarettes. Br J Addict. 1982;77(2):159–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1982.tb01417.x.
    1. Kozlowski LT, Pope MA, Lux JE. Prevalence of the misuse of ultra-low-tar cigarettes by blocking filter vents. Am J Public Health. 1988;78(6):694–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.78.6.694.
    1. Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Khouw V, Pope MA. The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters. Am J Public Health. 1980;70(11):1202–3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.70.11.1202.
    1. Reuter P. Can tobacco control endgame analysis learn anything from the US experience with illegal drugs? Tob Control. 2013;22(suppl 1):i49–51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050809.
    1. Nardone N, Donny EC, Hatsukami DK, Koopmeiners JS, Murphy SE, Strasser AA, Tidey JW, Vandrey R, Benowitz NL. Estimations and predictors of non-compliance in switchers to reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Addiction. 2016;111(12):2208–16. doi: 10.1111/add.13519.
    1. Richter P, Steven PR, Bravo R, Lisko JG, Damian M, Gonzalez-Jimenez N, Gray N, Keong LM, Kimbrell JB, Kuklenyik P, et al. Characterization of SPECTRUM variable nicotine research cigarettes. Tob Regul Sci. 2016;2(2):94–105. doi: 10.18001/TRS.2.2.1.
    1. Penn State Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science: Participant how-to videos. 2016. . Accessed 17 Dec 2016.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. A Report of the Surgeon General: How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: What It Means to You. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health eds.; 2010.
    1. American Lung Association: American Lung Association Freedom from Smoking Online. . Accessed 17 Dec 2015.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Baggett TP, Rigotti NA. Cigarette smoking and advice to quit in a national sample of homeless adults. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(2):164–72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.024.
    1. Lasser K, Boyd JW, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, McCormick D, Bor DH. Smoking and mental illness: a population-based prevalence study. JAMA. 2000;284(20):2606–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.20.2606.
    1. Kauffman RM, Ferketich AK, Murray DM, Bellair PE, Wewers ME. Tobacco use by male prisoners under an indoor smoking ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(6):449–56. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr024.
    1. Connolly GN, Alpert HR, Wayne GF, Koh H. Trends in nicotine yield in smoke and its relationship with design characteristics among popular US cigarette brands, 1997–2005. Tob Control. 2007;16(5) doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.019695.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever