Morphologic change of nerve and symptom relief are similar after mini-incision and endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial

Won-Taek Oh, Ho-Jung Kang, Il-Hyun Koh, Jin-Young Jang, Yun-Rak Choi, Won-Taek Oh, Ho-Jung Kang, Il-Hyun Koh, Jin-Young Jang, Yun-Rak Choi

Abstract

Background: The symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be ameliorated by open and endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament. It is unknown whether a mini-incision or endoscopic carpal tunnel release more effectively reverses the pathological changes that are observed in the median nerve in patients with CTS and these morphologic changes correlates with the subjective outcomes after carpal tunnel release. We hypothesized that (1) at 24 weeks after surgery, the subjective outcomes of mini-incision release and endoscopic release would not differ in patients with CTS; and (2) the ultrasonographic (US) morphology of the median nerve reverses similarly after mini-incision and endoscopic release; (3) the subjective outcomes correlates with these morphologic changes.

Methods: Between November 2011 and January 2013, 67 patients with CTS in their dominant wrist were randomized to either mini-incision (n = 32) or endoscopic (n = 35) release. Each patient was assessed by both the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) pre-operatively and 24 weeks' post-operation. An US examination was conducted at both time points to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) at the inlet, middle, and outlet (CSA-I, CSA-M and CSA-O) and the flattening ratio (FR) at the middle and outlet (FR-M and FR-O) of the median nerve.

Results: The post-operative mean BCTQ and DASH scores were improved significantly from the pre-operative scores in both groups (p < 0.001). The mean CSA-I decreased and CSA-M and CSA-O increased similarly in both groups (by 3.3, 3.0, and 3.8 mm2 in the mini-incision group and 2.9, 3.1. and 2.7 mm2 in the endoscopic group. The mean FR-M/FR-O decreased similarly from 3.6/4.2 to 3.2/3.0 in the mini-incision group and 3.8/4.3 to 3.2/2.9 in the endoscopic group. There were no significant differences in the subjective outcome scores or median nerve measures between the two groups. Improvement in the BCTQ-S only was significantly correlated with changes in the CSA at the inlet.

Conclusions: Mini-incision and endoscopic release both similarly relieved subjective symptoms and functions along with the pathological changes in the median nerve morphology along the carpal tunnel in patients with idiopathic CTS. Symptom relief after surgical decompression seems to correlate with reduced nerve swelling at carpal inlet and reversed nerve flattening inside carpal tunnel.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered in "ClinicalTrials.gov" at Oct 18th, 2013, and the registration number was NCT01972165 .

Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome; Endoscopic carpal tunnel release; Mini-incision; Ultrasonography.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The randomization scheme for the study as demonstrated in the CONSORT flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a A transverse US scan to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the tunnel inlet, which was at the level of the distal wrist crease. The CSAs of the nerve at the middle of the tunnel at the level of the pisiform and the tunnel outlet at the level of the hamate hook were also measured. b The flattening ratio (FR) of the median nerve, calculated by dividing the transverse diameter of the nerve by the anteroposterior diameter
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pairwise scatter plot of difference values for the clinical outcomes and the sonographic outcomes. Positive values indicate improvement of outcomes. Improvement in BCTQ-S score was significantly correlated with improvement in CSA-I (p = 0.005), while other values were not. BCTQ = Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; DASH = Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand; CSA-I = Cross-Sectional Area - Inlet; CSA-M = Cross-Sectional Area - Middle; CSA-O = Cross-Sectional Area - Outlet; FR-M = Flattening Ratio - Middle; FR-O = Flattening Ratio – Outlet

References

    1. Atroshi I, Hofer M, Larsson GU, Ornstein E, Johnsson R, Ranstam J. Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg [Am] 2009;34:266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.026.
    1. Abicalaf CA, de Barros N, Sernik RA, Pimentel BF, Braga-Baiak A, Braga L, Houvet P, Brasseur JL, Roger B, Cerri GG. Ultrasound evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome before and after endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(9):891–894. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.01.029.
    1. Buchberger W, Schon G, Strasser K, Jungwirth W. High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10:531–537. doi: 10.7863/jum.1991.10.10.531.
    1. Demirci S, Kutluhan S, Koyuncuoglu HR, Kerman M, Heybeli N, Akkus S, Akhan G. Comparison of open carpal tunnel release and local steroid treatment outcomes in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2002;22:33–37. doi: 10.1007/s00296-002-0184-0.
    1. El-Karabaty H, Hetzel A, Galla TJ, Horch RE, Lucking CH, Glocker FX. The effect of carpal tunnel release on median nerve flattening and nerve conduction. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;45(4):223–227.
    1. Ferdinand RD, MacLean JG. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomised, blinded assessment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002;84:375–379. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B3.12224.
    1. Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1089–1094. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1637-5.
    1. Fowler JR, Maltenfort MG, Ilyas AM. Ultrasound as a first-line test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:932–937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2662-3.
    1. Gerritsen AA, Uitdehaag BM, van Geldere D, Scholten RJ, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1285–1295. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01858.x.
    1. Hui AC, Wong S, Leung CH, Tong P, Mok V, Poon D, Li-Tsang CW, Wong LK, Boet R. A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology. 2005;64:2074–2078. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000169017.79374.93.
    1. Kang HJ, Koh IH, Lee TJ, Choi YR. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is preferred over mini-open despite similar outcome: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1548–1554. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2666-z.
    1. Kang S, Kwon HK, Kim KH, Yun HS. Ultrasonography of median nerve and electrophysiologic severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012;36:72–79. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.72.
    1. Karadag YS, Karadag O, Cicekli E, Ozturk S, Kiraz S, Ozbakir S, Filippucci E, Grassi W. Severity of Carpal tunnel syndrome assessed with high frequency ultrasonography. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30:761–765. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1061-x.
    1. Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC, Watters WC, 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Haralson RH, 3rd, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, McGowan R. American academy of orthopaedic surgeons clinical practice guideline on diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2478–2479. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00643.
    1. Kim DH, Marquardt TL, Gabra JN, Shen ZL, Evans PJ, Seitz WH, Li ZM. Pressure-morphology relationship of a released carpal tunnel. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:616–620. doi: 10.1002/jor.22271.
    1. Kuo MH, Leong CP, Cheng YF, Chang HW. Static wrist position associated with least median nerve compression: sonographic evaluation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:256–260. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200104000-00004.
    1. Lee CH, Kim TK, Yoon ES, Dhong ES. Postoperative morphologic analysis of carpal tunnel syndrome using high-resolution ultrasonography. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:143–146. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000143799.88513.47.
    1. Ludlow KS, Merla JL, Cox JA, Hurst LN. Pillar pain as a postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release: a review of the literature. J Hand Ther. 1997;10:277–282. doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(97)80042-7.
    1. Macdermid JC, Richards RS, Roth JH, Ross DC, King GJ. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial. J Hand Surg [Am] 2003;28:475–480. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50080.
    1. Moran L, Perez M, Esteban A, Bellon J, Arranz B, del Cerro M. Sonographic measurement of cross-sectional area of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation with nerve conduction studies. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:125–131. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20551.
    1. Pinilla I, Martin-Hervas C, Sordo G, Santiago S. The usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33:435–439. doi: 10.1177/1753193408090396.
    1. Rab M, Grunbeck M, Beck H, Haslik W, Schrogendorfer KF, Schiefer HP, Mittlbock M, Frey M. Intra-individual comparison between open and 2-portal endoscopic release in clinically matched bilateral carpal syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:730–736. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.018.
    1. Saw NL, Jones S, Shepstone L, Meyer M, Chapman PG, Logan AM. Early outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective trial. J Hand Surg (Br) 2003;28:444–449. doi: 10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00097-4.
    1. Smidt MH, Visser LH. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical and sonographic follow-up after surgery. Muscle Nerve. 2008;38:987–991. doi: 10.1002/mus.20982.
    1. Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1137–1146. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000135850.37523.D0.
    1. Vogelin E, Nuesch E, Juni P, Reichenbach S, Eser P, Ziswiler HR. Sonographic follow-up of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome undergoing surgical or nonsurgical treatment: prospective cohort study. J Hand Surg [Am] 2010;35:1401–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.06.010.
    1. Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC, Wong JM. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003;85:863–868.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever