Maximal mouth opening capacity: percentiles for healthy children 4-17 years of age

Lukas Müller, Hubertus van Waes, Christoph Langerweger, Luciano Molinari, Rotraud K Saurenmann, Lukas Müller, Hubertus van Waes, Christoph Langerweger, Luciano Molinari, Rotraud K Saurenmann

Abstract

Background: A reduced mouth opening capacity may be one of the first clinical signs of pathological changes in the masticatory system. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to create age related percentiles for unassisted maximal mouth opening capacity (MOC) of healthy children.

Methods: All recordings of MOC as measured at the yearly dental examinations of school children in the city of Zurich, Switzerland, between August 2009 and August 2010 were extracted from the database. The program LMSchartMaker Pro Version 2.43, Huiqi Pan and Tim Cole, Medical Research Council, 1997-2010 was used to calculate age and sex related reference centiles.

Results: Records from 22(')060 dental examinations were found during the study period. In 1286 (5.8%) the maximal interincisal measurement was missing. Another 55 examinations were excluded because of missing data for sex (7), age at examination (11) or because the value was deemed to be pathologically low (37). Thus, a total of 20(')719 measurements (10(')060 girls, 10(')659 boys) were included in the analysis. The median age (range) was 9.9 years (3.3-18.3) for girls and 10.0 years (2.8-18.7) for boys. The mean MOC (range) was 45 mm (25-69) for girls and 45 mm (25-70) for boys. Age related percentiles were created for girls and boys separately, showing the 3(rd), 10(th), 25(th), 50(th), 75(th), 90(th), and 97(th) percentile from 3 through 18 years of age.

Conclusions: In these 20(')719 unselected school children MOC increased with age but showed a wide range within children of the same age.

Keywords: Arthritis; Diagnosis; Juvenile idiopathic Arthritis; Outcome research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measuring the maximal mouth opening capacity. Measuring the maximal mouth opening capacity with a metallic calliper (millimetre scale) between the incisal edges of upper and lower central incisors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatterplot of all 22′060 measurements with outlayers. Extreme outliers (below dotted line) were defined as values less than 25 mm in 3–9 year-old children and less than 30 mm in children older than 10 years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Age related percentiles for boys. Percentiles of maximal mouth opening capacity for boys showing the 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentile from 3 through 18 years of age.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Age related percentiles for girls. Percentiles of maximal mouth opening capacity for girls showing the 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentile from 3 through 18 years of age.

References

    1. Al-Nawas B, Walter C, Morbach T, Seitner N, Siegel E, Maeurer M, Krummenauer F. Clinical and microbiological efficacy of moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in severe odontogenic abscesses: a pilot study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:75–82. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0587-2.
    1. Stegenga B, de Bont LG, Dijkstra PU, Boering G. Short-term outcome of arthroscopic surgery of temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;31:3–14. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(93)90089-F.
    1. Chen CT, Feng CH, Tsay PK, Lai JP, Chen YR. Functional outcomes following surgical treatment of bilateral mandibular condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.002.
    1. Singh V, Bhagol A, Goel M, Kumar I, Verma A. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1304–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.01.001.
    1. Acosta-Feria M, Villar-Puchades R, Haro-Luna JJ, Ramos-Medina B, Garcia-Solano E. Limitation of mouth opening caused by osteochondroma of the coronoid process. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e64–e68. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.020.
    1. Muller L, Kellenberger CJ, Cannizzaro E, Ettlin D, Schraner T, Bolt IB, Peltomaki T, Saurenmann RK. Early diagnosis of temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study comparing clinical examination and ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:680–685. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep068.
    1. Twilt M, Mobers SM, Arends LR, ten Cate R, van Suijlekom-Smit L. Temporomandibular involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1418–1422.
    1. Stoll ML, Sharpe T, Beukelman T, Good J, Young D, Cron RQ. Risk factors for temporomandibular joint arthritis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:1880–1887. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111441.
    1. Pedersen TK, Kuseler A, Gelineck J, Herlin T. A prospective study of magnetic resonance and radiographic imaging in relation to symptoms and clinical findings of the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1668–1675.
    1. Karhulahti T, Ronning O, Jamsa T. Mandibular condyle lesions, jaw movements, and occlusal status in 15-year-old children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98:17–26.
    1. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. 3. Analyses of anamnestic and clinical recordings of dysfunction with the aid of indices. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974;67:165–181.
    1. Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. Reliability of a craniomandibular index. J Dent Res. 1986;65:1359–1364. doi: 10.1177/00220345860650111701.
    1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992;6:301–355.
    1. Schiffman EL, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, Tai F, Anderson GC, Pan W, Gonzalez YM, John MT, Sommers E, List T, Velly AM, Kang W, Look JO. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised axis I diagnostic algorithms. J Orofac Pain. 2010;24:63–78.
    1. Landtwing K. Evaluation of the normal range of vertical mandibular opening in children and adolescents with special reference to age and stature. J Maxillofac Surg. 1978;6:157–162.
    1. Hirsch C, John MT, Lautenschlager C, List T. Mandibular jaw movement capacity in 10-17-yr-old children and adolescents: normative values and the influence of gender, age, and temporomandibular disorders. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114:465–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00402.x.
    1. Ingervall B. Range of movement of mandible in children. Scand J Dent Res. 1970;78:311–322.
    1. Sheppard IM, Sheppard SM. Maximal incisal opening–a diagnostic index? J Dent Med. 1965;20:13–15.
    1. Agerberg G. Maximal mandibular movements in teen-agers. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1974;12:79–102.
    1. Agerberg G. Maximal mandibular movements in young men and women. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974;67:81–100.
    1. Agerberg G. Maximal mandibular movements in children. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32:147–159. doi: 10.3109/00016357409002543.
    1. Ogura T, Morinushi T, Ohno H, Sumi K, Hatada K. An epidemiological study of TMJ dysfunction syndrome in adolescents. J Pedod. 1985;10:22–35.
    1. List T, Wahlund K, Wenneberg B, Dworkin SF. TMD in children and adolescents: prevalence of pain, gender differences, and perceived treatment need. J Orofac Pain. 1999;13:9–20.
    1. Vanderas AP. Mandibular movements and their relationship to age and body height in children with or without clinical signs of craniomandibular dysfunction: Part IV. A comparative study. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;59:338–341.
    1. Woolston SL, Beukelman T, Sherry DD. Back mobility and interincisor distance ranges in racially diverse North American healthy children and relationship to generalized hypermobility. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2012;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-10-17.
    1. Harlow Healthcare for Children. .
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
    1. Wright V, Hopkins R. The temporo-mandibular joint. Clin Rheum Dis. 1982;8:715–722.
    1. Rothenberg LH. An analysis of maximum mandibular movements, craniofacial relationships and temporomandibular joint awareness in children. Angle Orthod. 1991;61:103–112.
    1. Westling L, Helkimo E. Maximum jaw opening capacity in adolescents in relation to general joint mobility. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:485–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01112.x.
    1. Dijkstra PU, Hof AL, Stegenga B, de Bont LG. Influence of mandibular length on mouth opening. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:117–122. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00358.x.
    1. Dijkstra PU, de Bont LG, Stegenga B, Boering G. Temporomandibular joint mobility assessment: a comparison between four methods. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:439–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00798.x.
    1. Nilner M. Prevalence of functional disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system in 15–18 year olds. Swed Dent J. 1981;5:189–197.
    1. Nilner M, Lassing SA. Prevalence of functional disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system in 7–14 year olds. Swed Dent J. 1981;5:173–187.
    1. Hesse JR, Naeije M, Hansson TL. Craniomandibular stiffness toward maximum mouth opening in healthy subjects: a clinical and experimental investigation. J Craniomandib Disord. 1990;4:257–266.
    1. Kropmans T, Dijkstra P, Stegenga B, Stewart R, de Bont L. Smallest detectable difference of maximal mouth opening in patients with painfully restricted temporomandibular joint function. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:9–13. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.00747.x.
    1. Szentpetery A. Clinical utility of mandibular movement ranges. J Orofac Pain. 1993;7:163–168.
    1. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, Von Korff M, Howard J, Truelove E, Sommers E. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120:273–281.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever