Animal-Assisted Activity at A. Meyer Children's Hospital: A Pilot Study

Simona Caprilli, Andrea Messeri, Simona Caprilli, Andrea Messeri

Abstract

The authors systematically studied the introduction of animal-assisted activity into a children's hospital in Italy. This pilot study examined the reactions of children, their parents and the hospital staff and the hospital-wide infection rate before and after the introduction of animals. The SAM (self-assessment manikin), three behavioral scales, analysis of children's graphic productions, a parent questionnaire and a staff questionnaire were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. The children's participation was calculated. The analysis of the hospital infection rate was completed independently by the Hospital Infections Committee. The authors found that the presence of infections in the wards did not increase and the number of children at the meetings with pets in the wards was high (138 children). The study also found that the presence of animals produced some beneficial effects on children: a better perception of the environment and a good interaction with dogs. All parents were in favor of pets in the hospital, and 94% thought that this activity could benefit the child, as did the medical staff, although the staff needed more information about safety. The introduction of pets into the pediatric wards in an Italian children's hospital was a positive event because of the participation of hospitalized patients, the satisfaction expressed by both parents and medical staff, and the fact that the hospital infection rate did not change and no new infections developed after the introduction of dogs.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evaluation of the child's pleasure on a SAM visual scale.

References

    1. McMahon SM. Pets: a source of hope for children with life-threatening illness. In: Addaris D, Deveau E, editors. Beyond the Innocence of Childhood. Vol 2. New York: Baywood Publications; 1995.
    1. Hart LA. Methods, standards, guidelines, and consideration in selecting animals for animal assisted therapy. In: Fine A, editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
    1. Natoli E. Activities and therapy mediated by animals (pet-therapy): international picture and state of the art in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 1997;33:267–72.
    1. Friedmann E. The animal-human bond: health and wellness. In: Fine A, editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
    1. Hart LA. Psychosocial benefits of animal companionship. In: Fine A, editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
    1. Tsao JC. CAM for pediatric pain: what is state-of-the-research? Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2006;3:143–4.
    1. Tsao JC, Zeltzer LK. Complementary and alternative medicine approaches for pediatric pain: a review of the state-of-the-science. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005;2:149–59.
    1. Gorgzyca K, Fine A, Spain CV. History, theory and development of human-animal support services for people with AIDS and other chronic/terminal illnesses. In: Fine A, editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
    1. Geisler AM. Companion animals in palliative care: stories from the bedside. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004;21:285–8.
    1. Beck AM. The use of animals to benefit humans: animal-assisted therapy. In: Fine A, editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
    1. Katcher AH, Beck AM. New Perspectives on our Lives with Animal Companions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1983.
    1. Voelker R. Puppy love can be therapeutic, too—medical news and perspectives. J Am Med Assoc. 1995;274:1897–9.
    1. Granger BP, Kogan L. Animal-assisted therapy in specialized settings. In: Fine A, editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
    1. Robinson I. Pet therapy. Nurs Times. 1999;95:33–4.
    1. Donowitz LG. Pet therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:64–6.
    1. Farkas M. A cold nose can warm the heart. Mich Health Hosp. 1997;33:38.
    1. Davis S. Pet therapy … a pet project. Director. 1994;2:25.
    1. Malchiodi CA. Capire i disegni infantili. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore; 2000.
    1. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994;25:49–59.
    1. Bouchard F, Landry M, Belles-Isles M, Gagnon J. A magical dream: a pilot project in animal-assisted therapy in pediatric oncology. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2004;14:14–7.
    1. Gagnon J, Bouchard F, Landry M, Belles-Isles M, Fortier M, Fillion L. Implementing a hospital-based animal therapy program for children with cancer: a descriptive study. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2004;1:210–22.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever