Prevention through Activity in Kindergarten Trial (PAKT): a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of an activity intervention in preschool children

Kristina Roth, Sonja Mauer, Matthias Obinger, Katharina C Ruf, Christine Graf, Susi Kriemler, Dorothea Lenz, Walter Lehmacher, Helge Hebestreit, Kristina Roth, Sonja Mauer, Matthias Obinger, Katharina C Ruf, Christine Graf, Susi Kriemler, Dorothea Lenz, Walter Lehmacher, Helge Hebestreit

Abstract

Background: Physical activity and motor skills acquisition are of high importance for health-related prevention and a normal development in childhood. However, few intervention studies exist in preschool children focussing on an increase in physical activity and motor skills. Proof of positive effects is available but not consistent.

Methods/design: The design, curriculum, and evaluation strategy of a cluster randomised intervention study in preschool children are described in this manuscript. In the Prevention through Activity in Kindergarten Trial (PAKT), 41 of 131 kindergartens of Wuerzburg and Kitzingen, Germany, were randomised into an intervention and a control group by a random number table stratified for the location of the kindergarten in an urban (more than 20,000 inhabitants) or rural area. The aims of the intervention were to increase physical activity and motor skills in the participating children, and to reduce health risk factors as well as media use. The intervention was designed to involve children, parents and teachers, and lasted one academic year. It contained daily 30-min sessions of physical education in kindergarten based on a holistic pedagogic approach termed the "early psychomotor education". The sessions were instructed by kindergarten teachers under regular supervision by the research team. Parents were actively involved by physical activity homework cards. The kindergarten teachers were trained in workshops and during the supervision. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3-5 months into the intervention, at the end of the intervention and 2-4 months after the intervention. The primary outcomes of the study are increases in physical activity (accelerometry) and in motor skills performance (composite score of obstacle course, standing long jump, balancing on one foot, jumping sidewise to and fro) between baseline and the two assessments during the intervention. Secondary outcomes include decreases in body adiposity (BMI, skin folds), media use (questionnaire), blood pressure, number of accidents and infections (questionnaire), increases in specific motor skills (throwing, balancing, complex motor performance, jumping) and in flexibility.

Discussion: If this trial proofs the effectiveness of the multilevel kindergarten based physical activity intervention on preschooler's activity levels and motor skills, the programme will be distributed nationwide in Germany.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00623844.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the stratification and randomisation of clusters and individuals. 1) rural area - kindergarten is located in a village with <20,000 inhabitants. 2) urban area - kindergarten is located in a town with ≥20,000 inhabitants.

References

    1. Clearfield MW, Thelen E. In: Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2. Nelson CA, Luciana M, editor. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008. Stability and flexibility in the acquisition of skilled movement; pp. 147–160.
    1. Reilly JJ, Kelly L, Montgomery C, Williamson A, Fisher A, McColl JH, Lo Conte R, Paton JY, Grand S. Physical activity to prevent obesity in young children: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006;18:1041. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38979.623773.55.
    1. Kunz T. Psychomotorische Förderung ein neuer Weg der Unfallverhütung im Kindergarten. Frankfurt am Main: Bundesverband der Unfallversicherungsträger der öffentl. Hand. 1990.
    1. Kambas PA, Xanthi G, Heikenfeld R, Taxildaris K, Godolias G. Unfallverhütung durch Schulung der Bewegungskoordination bei Kindergartenkindern. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin. 2004;55(2):44–7.
    1. Roth K, Ruf K, Mauer S, Ahnert J, Schneider W, Graf C, Hebestreit H. Is there a secular decline in motor skills in preschool children? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2009. in press .
    1. Trost SG, Sirard JW, Dowda M, Pfeiffer KA, Pate RR. Physical activity in overweight and nonoverweight preschool children. Internat J Obes. 2003;27:834–839. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802311.
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States 1999-2004. JAMA. 2006;5;295(13):1549–55. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549.
    1. Kurth BM, Schaffrath Rosario A. The prevalence of overweight and obese children and adolescents living in Germany. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007;50(5-6):736–43. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0235-5.
    1. Riethmuller AM, Jones R, Okely AD. Efficacy of interventions to improve motor development in young children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009. in press .
    1. Wake M, Baur LA, Gerner B, Gibbons K, Gold L, Gunn J, Levickis P, McCallum Z, Naughton G, Sanci L, Ukoumunne OC. Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;3(339):b3308. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3308.
    1. Jouret B, Ahluwalia N, Bupuy M, Cristini C, Nègre-Pages L, Grandiean H, Tauber M. Prevention of overweight in preschool children: results of kindergarten-based interventions. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33(10):1075–1083. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.166.
    1. Mo-suwan L, Pongprapai S, Junjana C, Puetpaiboon A. Effects of a controlled trial of a school-based exercise program on the obesity indexes of preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;68(5):1006–10011.
    1. Connelly JB, Duaso MJ, Butler G. A systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to prevent childhood obesity and overweight: a realistic synthesis of the evidence. Public Health. 2007;121(7):510–7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.11.015.
    1. Kiphard EJ, Leger A. Psychomotorische Elementarerziehung ein Bildbericht. Gütersloh: Flöttman. 1975.
    1. Hünnekens H, Kiphard EJ. Bewegung heilt - psychomotorische Übungsbehandlung bei entwicklungsrückständigen Kindern. 5., neu überarb. Aufl. ed. Gütersloh: Flöttmann; 1975.
    1. Zimmer R, Cicurs H. Psychomotorik neue Ansätze im Sportförderunterricht und Sonderturnen. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 1987.
    1. Lebensmittelsicherheit BLfGu. Gesundheit der Vorschulkinder in Bayern - Ergebnisse der Schuleingangsuntersuchungen 2004/2005 - Statistisch-epidemiologischer Bericht. Erlangen. 2006.
    1. Veldhuis L, Struijk MK, Kroeze W, Oenema A, Renders CM, Bulk-Bunschoten AMW, HiraSing RA, Raat H. 'Be active, eat right', evaluation of an overweight prevention protocol among 5-year-old children: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-177.
    1. Kerry SM, Bland JM. Statistics notes: Sample size in cluster randomisation. BMJ. 1998;316:549.
    1. BZgA (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung) BfgA. Tut Kindern gut! Ernährung, Bewegung, Entspannung. Köln: rasch Bramsche; 2006.
    1. Rothney MP, Apker GA, Song Y, Chen KY. Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(4):1091–7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90641.2008.
    1. Pate RR, Almeida MJ, McIver KL, Pfeiffer KA, Dowda M. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14(11):2000–6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.234.
    1. Bös K, Bappert S, Tittlbach S, Woll A. Karlsruher Motorik-Screening für Kindergartenkinder (KMS 3 - 6) sportunterricht. 2004;53:79–87.
    1. Oja L, Jürimäe T. Assessment of motor ability of 4- and 5-year old children. American J Human Biology. 1997;9:659–664. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1997)9:5<659::AID-AJHB12>;2-L.
    1. Barker ME, Shiell AW, Law CM. Evaluation of the Dinamap 8100 and Omron M1 blood pressure monitors for use in children. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14(2):179–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00250.x.
    1. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sehps SG, Roccella EJ. Recommandations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the american heart association council on high blood pressure research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6.
    1. Zimmer R. MOT 4-6 Motoriktest für vier- bis sechsjährige Kinder. Manual. Weinheim: Beltz; 1987.
    1. Schneider P, Hänscheid H, Schwab M, Jakob F. Assessment of neuromuscular function with a new ground reaction force platform using power spectrum analysis technique. WC 2009, IFMBE Proceedings 25/XII.
    1. Lange M, Kamtsiuris P, Lange C, Schaffrath Rosario A, Stolzenberg H, Lampert T. Sociodemographic characteristics in the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) - operationalisation and public health significance, taking as an example the assessment of general state of health. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007;50(5-6):578–89. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0219-5.
    1. Wegener B. Kritik des Prestiges. Opladen: Westdteutscher Verlag; 1988.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever