Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: the CHIPS Study
S A French, R W Jeffery, M Story, K K Breitlow, J S Baxter, P Hannan, M P Snyder, S A French, R W Jeffery, M Story, K K Breitlow, J S Baxter, P Hannan, M P Snyder
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the effects of pricing and promotion strategies on purchases of low-fat snacks from vending machines.
Methods: Low-fat snacks were added to 55 vending machines in a convenience sample of 12 secondary schools and 12 worksites. Four pricing levels (equal price, 10% reduction, 25% reduction, 50% reduction) and 3 promotional conditions (none, low-fat label, low-fat label plus promotional sign) were crossed in a Latin square design. Sales of low-fat vending snacks were measured continuously for the 12-month intervention.
Results: Price reductions of 10%, 25%, and 50% on low-fat snacks were associated with significant increases in low-fat snack sales; percentages of low-fat snack sales increased by 9%, 39%, and 93%, respectively. Promotional signage was independently but weakly associated with increases in low-fat snack sales. Average profits per machine were not affected by the vending interventions.
Conclusions: Reducing relative prices on low-fat snacks was effective in promoting lower-fat snack purchases from vending machines in both adult and adolescent populations.
References
- J Sch Health. 1977 Jan;47(1):33-7
- Nutr Rev. 1981 Feb;39(2):73-88
- Prev Med. 1981 Jan;10(1):85-93
- J Am Diet Assoc. 1987 May;87(5):615-9
- Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):395-415
- Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1121-6
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jan;61(1 Suppl):205S-212S
- Prev Med. 1994 Nov;23(6):788-92
- J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Apr;95(4):417-8
- Health Educ Q. 1995 Nov;22(4):512-27
- J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Feb;96(2):123-6
- Am J Public Health. 1997 May;87(5):740-6
- Am J Public Health. 1997 May;87(5):849-51
- J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Sep;97(9):1008-10
- J Am Coll Nutr. 1997 Dec;16(6):535-43
- Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):277-80
- J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Apr;99(4):471-5
Source: PubMed