Temperature changes in human patellar tendon in response to therapeutic ultrasound

A K Chan, J W Myrer, G J Measom, D O Draper, A K Chan, J W Myrer, G J Measom, D O Draper

Abstract

Objective: To determine the rate and magnitude of temperature change in response to ultrasound in human patellar tendon for two treatment sizes.

Design and setting: A thermistor was inserted into the medial aspect of each subject's right patellar tendon, and the baseline temperature was recorded. Using stratified random sampling and using a transducer head with an effective radiating area (ERA) of 4.5 cm(2), we had eight subjects each undergo either the 2-or 4-ERA ultrasound treatment first. Each subject received a 3-MHz continuous ultrasound treatment at 1 W/cm(2) for both the 2-and 4-ERA treatment sizes.

Subjects: Sixteen subjects (8 males, 21.3 +/- 1.9 years, and 8 females, 21.0 +/- 2.8 years) participated.

Measurements: We moved the sound head at a speed of 2 to 3 cm/sec while recording the tendon temperature every 30 seconds during, and for 20 minutes after, the 4-minute treatment. Twenty minutes after the treatment, we applied the second treatment to the other ERA treatment size.

Results: At the end of the treatment, the mean temperature increase was significantly different (P = .006) between treatment sizes (8.3 degrees C +/- 1.7 degrees C (2 x ERA) and 5.0 degrees C +/- 1.0 degrees C (4 x ERA)). The rate of increase was also significantly different (P < .001). The heating rate per minute for the 2-ERA treatment was 2.1 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C and 1.3 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C for the 4-ERA treatment. There was a significant difference in the cooling between treatment sizes (P = .001). The rate of temperature decrease between treatment sizes was significantly different only during the first 5-minute interval post-treatment.

Conclusion: Three-megahertz ultrasound at an intensity of 1 W/cm(2) significantly increased patellar tendon temperature at both 2 and 4 x ERA, but our results confirm that the 2-ERA treatment size provided higher and longer heating than the 4-ERA treatment size.

References

    1. J Athl Train. 1996 Apr;31(2):139-43
    1. J Athl Train. 1993 Fall;28(3):246-50
    1. J Athl Train. 1995 Oct;30(4):304-7
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1962 Sep;43:461-6
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1960 Jul;41:293-8
    1. Am J Phys Med. 1960 Apr;39:51-62
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1958 Sep;39(9):560-5
    1. Am J Phys Med. 1955 Apr;34(2):362-9
    1. Am J Phys Med. 1954 Feb;33(1):61-5
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Oct;22(4):142-50
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993 May;17(5):247-51
    1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Dec;68(6):283-7
    1. Phys Ther. 1986 Feb;66(2):194-9
    1. Phys Ther. 1987 May;67(5):674-9
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967 Aug;48(8):397-401
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 May;65(5):223-7
    1. Phys Med Biol. 1980 Sep;25(5):827-37
    1. Physiotherapy. 1978 Apr;64(4):103-4
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978 Oct;59(10):472-5
    1. Phys Ther. 1978 May;58(5):543-6
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974 Mar-Apr;(99):207-45
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976 Mar;57(3):122-6
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970 Aug;51(8):481-7
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1968 Jan;49(1):28-30

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever