Procedural sedation and analgesia for percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage: Randomized clinical trial for comparison of two different concepts

Alex Zanvettor, Wolfgang Lederer, Bernhard Glodny, Andreas P Chemelli, Franz J Wiedermann, Alex Zanvettor, Wolfgang Lederer, Bernhard Glodny, Andreas P Chemelli, Franz J Wiedermann

Abstract

Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is important during painful dilatation and stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). A prospective, nonblinded randomized clinical trial was performed comparing different analgesic regimens with regard to the patient's comfort. Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups in a parallel study, receiving either remifentanil or combined midazolam, piritramide, and S-ketamine. The primary study endpoint was pain intensity before, during, and after the intervention using the numerical rating scale (0, no pain; 10, maximum pain). The secondary study endpoint was the satisfaction of the interventional radiologist. Fifty patients underwent PTBD of whom 19 (38.0%) underwent additional stenting. During intervention, the two groups did not differ significantly. After the intervention, the need for auxiliary opioids was higher (12.5% vs 7.7%; p = 0.571) and nausea/vomiting was more frequently observed (33.4% vs 3.8%; p = 0.007) in patients with remifentanil than in patients with PSA. Overall, 45 patients (90.0%) needed additional administration of non-opioid analgesics during postinterventional observation. Remifentanil and combined midazolam, piritramide, and S-ketamine obtained adequate analgesic effects during PTBD. After the intervention, medications with antiemetics and long-acting analgesics were more frequently administered in patients treated with remifentanil (EudraCT No. 2006-003285-34; institutional funding).

Keywords: S-ketamine; analgesia; biliary tract; cholestasis; interventional radiology; midazolam; piritramide; procedural sedation; remifentanil.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: This investigation served Katrin Böker as descriptive research in a master thesis on at the UMIT – Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria. The abstract was presented at the Euroanaesthesia 2015, The European Anaesthesiology Congress, Berlin, Germany, May 30 – June 2, 2015. Corresponding author Dr Franz J. Wiedermann, serve as Section Editor for Open Medicine, but this fact hasnt affected the peer-review process. The authors state no conflict of otherwise interest, also financial.

© 2020 Alex Zanvettor et al., published by De Gruyter.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of a parallel randomized trial of two groups, modified from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010.

References

    1. el-Bitar N, Sfeir S. Evaluation of remifentanil in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2006;18:1209–16.
    2. el-Bitar N, Sfeir S. Evaluation of remifentanil in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2006;18:1209–16.
    1. Chandrashekhara SH, Gamanagatti S, Singh A, Bhatnagar S. Current status of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice: a review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016;22(4):378–87.
    2. Chandrashekhara SH, Gamanagatti S, Singh A, Bhatnagar S. Current status of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice: a review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016;22(4):378–87.
    1. Riaz A, Pinkard JP, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Percutaneous management of malignant biliary disease. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(1):45–56.
    2. Riaz A, Pinkard JP, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Percutaneous management of malignant biliary disease. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(1):45–56.
    1. Mueller PR, Biswal S, Halpern EF, Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Interventional radiologic procedure: patient anxiety, perception of pain, understanding of procedure and satisfaction with medication – a prospective study. Radiology. 2000;215:684–8.
    2. Mueller PR, Biswal S, Halpern EF, Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Interventional radiologic procedure: patient anxiety, perception of pain, understanding of procedure and satisfaction with medication – a prospective study. Radiology. 2000;215:684–8.
    1. Munte S, Adams HA. Stand-by and conscious sedation-possibilities and limits of anesthesiological management. Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2001;26(2):44–9.
    2. Munte S, Adams HA. Stand-by and conscious sedation-possibilities and limits of anesthesiological management. Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2001;26(2):44–9.
    1. Hatzidakis A, Charonitakis E, Athanasiou A, Tsetis D, Chlouverakis G, Papamastorakis G, et al. Sedations and analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Clin Rad. 2003;58(2):121–7.
    2. Hatzidakis A, Charonitakis E, Athanasiou A, Tsetis D, Chlouverakis G, Papamastorakis G. et al. Sedations and analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Clin Rad. 2003;58(2):121–7.
    1. Lyon SM, Terhaar O, Given MF, O’Dwyer HM, McGrath FP, Lee MJ. Percutaneous embolization of transhepatic tracks for biliary intervention. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29(6):1011–4.
    2. Lyon SM, Terhaar O, Given MF, O’Dwyer HM, McGrath FP, Lee MJ. Percutaneous embolization of transhepatic tracks for biliary intervention. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29(6):1011–4.
    1. Pitetti R, Davis PJ, Redlinger R, White J, Wiener E, Calhoun KH. Effect on hospital-wide sedation practices after implementation of the 2001 JCAHO procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:211–6.
    2. Pitetti R, Davis PJ, Redlinger R, White J, Wiener E, Calhoun KH. Effect on hospital-wide sedation practices after implementation of the 2001 JCAHO procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:211–6.
    1. Tuite C, Rosenberg EJ. Sedation and analgesia in interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2005;22(2):114–20.
    2. Tuite C, Rosenberg EJ. Sedation and analgesia in interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2005;22(2):114–20.
    1. Moser B, von Goedecke A, Chemelli A, Keller C, Voelckel W, Lindner KH, et al. Analgesia with remifentanil in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing brief but painful radiological procedures. Anaesthesist. 2005;54(11):1089–93.
    2. Moser B, von Goedecke A, Chemelli A, Keller C, Voelckel W, Lindner KH. et al. Analgesia with remifentanil in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing brief but painful radiological procedures. Anaesthesist. 2005;54(11):1089–93.
    1. Park NS, Bae JI, Park AW, Won JH, Lee HS. Safety and effectiveness of analgesia with remifentanil for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):1430–3.
    2. Park NS, Bae JI, Park AW, Won JH, Lee HS. Safety and effectiveness of analgesia with remifentanil for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(5):1430–3.
    1. Dershwitz M, Rosow CE. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteers with severe hepatic or renal dysfunction. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8(3 Suppl):88S–90S.
    2. Dershwitz M, Rosow CE. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteers with severe hepatic or renal dysfunction. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8(3 Suppl):88S–90S.
    1. Wilhelm W, Kreuer S. The place for short-acting opioids: special emphasis on remifentanil. Crit Care. 2008;12(Suppl 3):5S.
    2. Wilhelm W, Kreuer S. The place for short-acting opioids: special emphasis on remifentanil. Crit Care. 2008;12(Suppl 3):5S.
    1. Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(4 Suppl):S7–14.
    2. Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(4 Suppl):S7–14.
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
    2. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D. et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
    1. Smessaert A, Scher CA, Artusio JF. Nausea and vomiting in the immediate postanaesthetic period. JAMA. 1959;170:2072–6.
    2. Smessaert A, Scher CA, Artusio JF. Nausea and vomiting in the immediate postanaesthetic period. JAMA. 1959;170:2072–6.
    1. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):17–24.
    2. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):17–24.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657–62.
    2. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:657–62. CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)
    1. Akkurt BCO, Temiz M, Inanoglu K, Aslan A, Turhanoglu S, Asfuroglu Z, et al. Comparison of recovery characteristics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and gastrointestinal motility with total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with desflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2009;70(2):94–103.
    2. Akkurt BCO, Temiz M, Inanoglu K, Aslan A, Turhanoglu S, Asfuroglu Z. et al. Comparison of recovery characteristics, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and gastrointestinal motility with total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with desflurane for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2009;70(2):94–103.
    1. Amin HM, Sopchak AM, Esposito BF, Henson LG, Batenhorst RL, Fox AW, et al. Naloxone-induced and spontaneous reversal of depressed ventilatory responses to hypoxia during and after continuous infusion of remifentanil or alfentanil. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274(1):34–9.
    2. Amin HM, Sopchak AM, Esposito BF, Henson LG, Batenhorst RL, Fox AW. et al. Naloxone-induced and spontaneous reversal of depressed ventilatory responses to hypoxia during and after continuous infusion of remifentanil or alfentanil. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274(1):34–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever