Knotless anchors with sutures external to the anchor body may be at risk for suture cutting through osteopenic bone

Y Ono, J M Woodmass, A A Nelson, R S Boorman, G M Thornton, I K Y Lo, Y Ono, J M Woodmass, A A Nelson, R S Boorman, G M Thornton, I K Y Lo

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the mechanical performance, under low-load cyclic loading, of two different knotless suture anchor designs: sutures completely internal to the anchor body (SpeedScrew) and sutures external to the anchor body and adjacent to bone (MultiFIX P).

Methods: Using standard suture loops pulled in-line with the rotator cuff (approximately 60°), anchors were tested in cadaveric bone and foam blocks representing normal to osteopenic bone. Mechanical testing included preloading to 10 N and cyclic loading for 500 cycles from 10 N to 60 N at 60 mm/min. The parameters evaluated were initial displacement, cyclic displacement and number of cycles and load at 3 mm displacement relative to preload. Video recording throughout testing documented the predominant source of suture displacement and the distance of 'suture cutting through bone'.

Results: In cadaveric bone and foam blocks, MultiFIX P anchors had significantly greater initial displacement, and lower number of cycles and lower load at 3 mm displacement than SpeedScrew anchors. Video analysis revealed 'suture cutting through bone' as the predominant source of suture displacement in cadaveric bone (qualitative) and greater 'suture cutting through bone' comparing MultiFIX P with SpeedScrew anchors in foam blocks (quantitative). The greater suture displacement in MultiFIX P anchors was predominantly from suture cutting through bone, which was enhanced in an osteopenic bone model.

Conclusions: Anchors with sutures external to the anchor body are at risk for suture cutting through bone since the suture eyelet is at the distal tip of the implant and the suture directly abrades against the bone edge during cyclic loading. Suture cutting through bone may be a significant source of fixation failure, particularly in osteopenic bone.Cite this article: Y. Ono, J. M. Woodmass, A. A. Nelson, R. S. Boorman, G. M. Thornton, I. K. Y. Lo. Knotless anchors with sutures external to the anchor body may be at risk for suture cutting through osteopenic bone. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:269-275. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.2000535.

Keywords: Bone quality; Knotless suture anchor; Rotator cuff; Suture cutting through bone.

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE conflict of interest: I. K. Y. Lo is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. and Artho Care Corp.

© 2016 Lo et al.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Two major designs of knotless suture anchors according to the way the sutures are handled with respect to the anchor body: (left) internal knotless suture anchor (e.g. SpeedScrew anchor), (right) external knotless suture anchor (e.g. MultiFIX P anchor).
Fig. 4
Mechanical performance of knotless suture anchors in cadaveric bone: a) initial displacement from the preload to the peak of the first cycle; b) cyclic displacement from the peak of the first cycle to the peak of the 500th cycle; c) number of cycles at 3 mm displacement relative to the preload; d) load at 3 mm displacement relative to the preload.*MultiFIX P different than SpeedScrew (p

Mechanical performance of knotless suture anchors in…

Mechanical performance of knotless suture anchors in foam (20/8, 15/8, 8/8): a) initial displacement from…

Mechanical performance of knotless suture anchors in foam (20/8, 15/8, 8/8): a) initial displacement from the preload to the peak of the first cycle; b) cyclic displacement from the peak of the first cycle to the peak of the 500th cycle; c) number of cycles at 3 mm displacement relative to the preload; d) load at 3 mm displacement relative to the preload. “n = 1” indicates one observation because four out of five MultiFIX P anchors in 8/8 foam failed during cyclic loading.*MultiFIX P different than SpeedScrew (p post hoc analysis).

Fig. 4

‘Suture cutting through bone’ during…

Fig. 4

‘Suture cutting through bone’ during cyclic loading of knotless suture anchors in 15/8…

Fig. 4
‘Suture cutting through bone’ during cyclic loading of knotless suture anchors in 15/8 foam.*MultiFIX P different than SpeedScrew (p sd, standard deviation.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4957181/bin/bonejointres-05-269-g003.jpg
Mechanical performance of knotless suture anchors in foam (20/8, 15/8, 8/8): a) initial displacement from the preload to the peak of the first cycle; b) cyclic displacement from the peak of the first cycle to the peak of the 500th cycle; c) number of cycles at 3 mm displacement relative to the preload; d) load at 3 mm displacement relative to the preload. “n = 1” indicates one observation because four out of five MultiFIX P anchors in 8/8 foam failed during cyclic loading.*MultiFIX P different than SpeedScrew (p post hoc analysis).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
‘Suture cutting through bone’ during cyclic loading of knotless suture anchors in 15/8 foam.*MultiFIX P different than SpeedScrew (p sd, standard deviation.

References

    1. Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:10-15.
    1. Randelli P, Spennacchio P, Ragone V, Arrigoni P, Casella A, Cabitza P. Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review. Musculoskelet Surg 2012;96:9-16.
    1. Tashjian RZ, Hollins AM, Kim HM, et al. Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:2435-2442.
    1. Randelli P, Cucchi D, Ragone V, de Girolamo L, Cabitza P, Randelli M. History of rotator cuff surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23:344-362.
    1. Thal R. A knotless suture anchor. Design, function, and biomechanical testing. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:646-649.
    1. Barber FA, Bava ED, Spenciner DB, Piccirillo J. Cyclic biomechanical testing of biocomposite lateral row knotless anchors in a human cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 2013;29:1012-1018.
    1. Pietschmann MF, Froehlich V, Ficklscherer A, Wegener B, Jansson V, Muller PE. Biomechanical testing of a new knotless suture anchor compared with established anchors for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:642-646.
    1. Pietschmann MF, Gülecyüz MF, Fieseler S, et al. Biomechanical stability of knotless suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair in healthy and osteopenic bone. Arthroscopy 2010;26:1035-1044.
    1. Robbe R, Paletta GA. Knotless suture-based anchors. Oper Tech Sports Med 2004;12:221-224.
    1. Leedle BP, Miller MD. Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy 2005;21:81-85.
    1. Woodmass JM, Matthewson G, Ono Y, et al. Suture locking of isolated internal locking knotless suture anchors is not affected by bone quality. Open Access J Sports Med 2015;6:201-208.
    1. Burkhart SS. Reprint of: The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy 2014;30:895-899.
    1. Barber FA, Hapa O, Bynum JA. Comparative testing by cyclic loading of rotator cuff suture anchors containing multiple high-strength sutures. Arthroscopy 2010;26(Suppl):S134-S141.
    1. Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Chan KC, Athanasiou K. Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Arthroscopy 2004;20:489-502.
    1. Meyer DC, Mayer J, Weber U, Mueller A, Koch PP, Gerber C. Ultrasonically implanted PLA suture anchors are stable in osteopenic bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;442:143-148.
    1. Poukalova M, Yakacki CM, Guldberg RE, et al. Pullout strength of suture anchors: effect of mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 2010;43:1138-1145.
    1. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1466-1473.
    1. Yakacki CM, Poukalova M, Guldberg RE, et al. The effect of the trabecular microstructure on the pullout strength of suture anchors. J Biomech 2010;43:1953-1959.
    1. Burkhart SS, Johnson TC, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA. Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: tension overload as a possible cause of failure. Arthroscopy 1997;13:172-176.
    1. Hattrup SJA. Rotator cuff repair: Relevance of patient age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995;4:95-100.
    1. Leek BT, Robertson C, Mahar A, Pedowitz RA. Comparison of mechanical stability in double-row rotator cuff repairs between a knotless transtendon construct versus the addition of medial knots. Arthroscopy 2010;26(Suppl):S127-S133.
    1. Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J, et al. Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a systematic review on the biomechanical importance of tying the medial row. Arthroscopy 2013;29:377-386.
    1. Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Milz S, et al. Assessment of bone quality within the tuberosities of the osteoporotic humeral head: relevance for anchor positioning in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:564-569.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever