Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce Social Health Inequalities: A French Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Rémy De Mil, Elodie Guillaume, Lydia Guittet, Olivier Dejardin, Véronique Bouvier, Carole Pornet, Véronique Christophe, Annick Notari, Hélène Delattre-Massy, Chantal De Seze, Jérôme Peng, Guy Launoy, Célia Berchi, Rémy De Mil, Elodie Guillaume, Lydia Guittet, Olivier Dejardin, Véronique Bouvier, Carole Pornet, Véronique Christophe, Annick Notari, Hélène Delattre-Massy, Chantal De Seze, Jérôme Peng, Guy Launoy, Célia Berchi
Abstract
Background: Patient navigation programs to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence have become widespread in recent years, especially among deprived populations.
Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the first patient navigation program in France.
Methods: A total of 16,250 participants were randomized to either the usual screening group (n = 8145) or the navigation group (n = 8105). Navigation consisted of personalized support provided by social workers. A cost-effectiveness analysis of navigation versus usual screening was conducted from the payer perspective in the Picardy region of northern France. We considered nonmedical direct costs in the analysis.
Results: Navigation was associated with a significant increase of 3.3% (24.4% vs. 21.1%; P = 0.003) in participation. The increase in participation was higher among affluent participants (+4.1%; P = 0.01) than among deprived ones (+2.6%; P = 0.07). The cost per additional individual screened by navigation compared with usual screening (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) was €1212 globally and €1527 among deprived participants. Results were sensitive to navigator wages and to the intervention effectiveness whose variations had the greatest impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Conclusions: Patient navigation aiming at increasing CRC screening participation is more efficient among affluent individuals. Nevertheless, when the intervention is implemented for the entire population, social inequalities in CRC screening adherence increase. To reduce social inequalities, patient navigation should therefore be restricted to deprived populations, despite not being the most cost-effective strategy, and accepted to bear a higher extra cost per additional individual screened.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01555450.
Keywords: colorectal cancer screening; cost-effectiveness analysis; patient navigation; social inequalities.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed