Developing a Digital Marketplace for Family Planning: Pilot Randomized Encouragement Trial

Eric P Green, Arun Augustine, Violet Naanyu, Anna-Karin Hess, Lulla Kiwinda, Eric P Green, Arun Augustine, Violet Naanyu, Anna-Karin Hess, Lulla Kiwinda

Abstract

Background: Family planning is an effective tool for preventing death among women who do not want to become pregnant and has been shown to improve newborn health outcomes, advance women's empowerment, and bring socioeconomic benefits through reductions in fertility and population growth. Yet among the populations that would benefit the most from family planning, uptake remains too low. The emergence of digital health tools has created new opportunities to strengthen health systems and promote behavior change. In this study, women with an unmet need for family planning in Western Kenya were randomized to receive an encouragement to try an automated investigational digital health intervention that promoted the uptake of family planning.

Objective: The objectives of the pilot study were to explore the feasibility of a full-scale trial-in particular, the recruitment, encouragement, and follow-up data collection procedures-and to examine the preliminary effect of the intervention on contraception uptake.

Methods: This pilot study tested the procedures for a randomized encouragement trial. We recruited 112 women with an unmet need for family planning from local markets in Western Kenya, conducted an eligibility screening, and randomized half of the women to receive an encouragement to try the investigational intervention. Four months after encouraging the treatment group, we conducted a follow-up survey with enrolled participants via short message service (SMS) text message.

Results: The encouragement sent via SMS text messages to the treatment group led to differential rates of intervention uptake between the treatment and control groups; however, uptake by the treatment group was lower than anticipated (19/56, 33.9% vs 1/56, 1.8%, in the control group). Study attrition was also substantial. We obtained follow-up data from 44.6% (50/112) of enrolled participants. Among those in the treatment group who tried the intervention, the instrumental variables estimate of the local average treatment effect was an increase in the probability of contraceptive uptake of 41.0 percentage points (95% uncertainty interval -0.03 to 0.85).

Conclusions: This randomized encouragement design and study protocol is feasible but requires modifications to the recruitment, encouragement, and follow-up data collection procedures.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03224390; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03224390 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70yitdJu8).

Keywords: Kenya; contraception; digital health; family planning; unmet need.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: EPG is a co-founder of Nivi, Inc, holds an equity stake in the company, is a member of the company’s Board of Directors, and serves as the company’s Chief Scientist. EPG is a faculty member in the Duke Global Health Institute. Duke University also holds an equity stake in the company. EPG’s potential conflicts of interest are managed by Duke University’s Research Integrity Office (MP#0600050-2017-001-A).

©Eric P Green, Arun Augustine, Violet Naanyu, Anna-Karin Hess, Lulla Kiwinda. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 31.07.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram.

References

    1. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ, Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006 Oct 07;368(9543):1284–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.
    1. Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1810–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4.
    1. Bongaarts J, Cleland J, Townsend J, Bertrand J, Gupta M. Family Planning Programs For the 21st Century. New York: Population Council; 2012. [2018-07-19]. .
    1. Prata N, Fraser A, Huchko MJ, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, Ciaraldi EJ, Upadhyay UD. WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND FAMILY PLANNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. J Biosoc Sci. 2017 Nov;49(6):713–743. doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000663.
    1. Silverman R, Birdsall N, Glassman A. Center for Global Development. 2016. [2018-04-05]. Can access to contraception deliver for women?s economic empowerment? What we know ? and what we must learn .
    1. United N, Department OEA. United Nations. 2017. World Family Planning 2017 - Highlights .
    1. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Kenya Ministry of Health, National AIDS Control Council, Kenya Medical Research Institute, National Council for PopulationDevelopment. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey. Nairobi, Kenya: KNBS; 2015. [2018-07-19]. .
    1. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Kenya Ministry of Health, National AIDS Control Council, Kenya Medical Research Institute, National Council for PopulationDevelopment. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014 Key Indicators. Kenya: KNBS; 2014. .
    1. FP2020. 2017. [2018-04-05]. FP2020: The Way Ahead .
    1. Mwaikambo L, Speizer IS, Schurmann A, Morgan G, Fikree F. What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2011 Jun;42(2):67–82.
    1. Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Aug;1(2):160–71. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031.
    1. Gurman Tilly A, Rubin Sara E, Roess Amira A. Effectiveness of mHealth behavior change communication interventions in developing countries: a systematic review of the literature. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:82–104. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649160.
    1. Johnson D, Juras R, Riley P, Chatterji M, Sloane P, Choi SK, Johns B. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of a family planning mHealth service on knowledge and use of contraception. Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.009.
    1. Wittes J, Brittain E. The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials. Stat Med. 1990;9(1-2):65–71; discussion 71.
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307–12. doi: 10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x.
    1. Bradley S, Croft T, Fishel J, Westoff C. Revising unmet need for family planning. Calverton, Maryland: ICF International and MEASURE DHS; 2012. [2018-07-19]. .
    1. Bradley SEK, Casterline JB. Understanding unmet need: history, theory, and measurement. Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Jun;45(2):123–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00381.x.
    1. Nivi. 2016. [2018-04-05].
    1. West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Des JDC, Holtgrave D, Szapocznik J, Fishbein M, Rapkin B, Clatts M, Mullen PD. Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1359–66. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124446.
    1. Duflo E, Saez E. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2003;118(3):815–842.
    1. Devoto F, Duflo E, Dupas P, Parienté W, Pons V. Happiness on Tap: Piped Water Adoption in Urban Morocco. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2012 Nov;4(4):68–99. doi: 10.1257/pol.4.4.68.
    1. Holland PW. Causal Inference, Path Analysis, and Recursive Structural Equations Models. Sociological Methodology. 1988;18:449. doi: 10.2307/271055.
    1. Hirano K, Imbens GW, Rubin DB, Zhou XH. Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. Biostatistics. 2000 Mar;1(1):69–88. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.69.
    1. Moore. Ryan T. BlockTools: Blocking, assignment, and diagnosing interference in randomized experiments. 2016. [2018-07-19]. .
    1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2017. [2018-04-05]. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Internet
    1. World Health Organization. 2018. Family planning/Contraception
    1. Kleiber C, Zeileis A. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2008. [2018-04-05]. AER: Applied Econometrics with R .
    1. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2014. [2018-04-05]. ivpack: Instrumental Variable Estimation .
    1. Angrist J, Pischke J. Mastering 'Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2014.
    1. Holland PW. Causal Inference, Path Analysis, and Recursive Structural Equations Models. Sociological Methodology. 1988;18:449. doi: 10.2307/271055.
    1. Tatango. [2018-04-05]. The Average SMS Marketing Click-Through Rate is 36% 2015
    1. Armanasco AA, Miller YD, Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL. Preventive Health Behavior Change Text Message Interventions: A Meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.042.
    1. Smith C, Ngo TD, Gold J, Edwards P, Vannak U, Sokhey L, Machiyama K, Slaymaker E, Warnock R, McCarthy O, Free C. Effect of a mobile phone-based intervention on post-abortion contraception: a randomized controlled trial in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Dec 01;93(12):842–50A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.160267.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever