Quantified self and comprehensive geriatric assessment: older adults are able to evaluate their own health and functional status

Olivier Beauchet, Cyrille P Launay, Christine Merjagnan, Anastasiia Kabeshova, Cédric Annweiler, Olivier Beauchet, Cyrille P Launay, Christine Merjagnan, Anastasiia Kabeshova, Cédric Annweiler

Abstract

Background: There is an increased interest of individuals in quantifying their own health and functional status. The aim of this study was to examine the concordance of answers to a self-administered questionnaire exploring health and functional status with information collected during a full clinical examination performed by a physician among cognitively healthy adults (CHI) and older patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD).

Methods: Based on cross-sectional design, a total of 60 older adults (20 CHI, 20 patients with MCI, and 20 patients with mild-to-moderate AD) were recruited in the memory clinic of Angers, France. All participants completed a self-administered questionnaire in paper format composed of 33 items exploring age, gender, nutrition, place of living, social resources, drugs daily taken, memory complaint, mood and general feeling, fatigue, activities of daily living, physical activity and history of falls. Participants then underwent a full clinical examination by a physician exploring the same domains.

Results: High concordance between the self-administered questionnaire and physician's clinical examination was showed. The few divergences were related to cognitive status, answers of AD and MCI patients to the self-administered questionnaire being less reliable than those of CHI.

Conclusion: Older adults are able to evaluate their own health and functional status, regardless of their cognitive status. This result needs to be confirmed and opens new perspectives for the quantified self-trend and could be helpful in daily clinical practice of primary care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. den Braber M (2013) Quantified Self: insight in yourself through self-monitoring. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 157: A7028.
    1. Salomon JA, Nordhagen S, Oza S, Murray CJL (2009) Are Americans feeling less healthy? The Puzzle of Trends in self-rated health. American Journal of Epidemiology 170: 343–351.
    1. Kramers PGN (2003) The ECHI project - Health indicators for the European community. Eur J Public Health 13: 101–106.
    1. World Health Organization (1996) Health interview surveys: Towards international harmonization of methods and instruments. WHO Regional Publications - European Series, 58.
    1. Andrews G, Kemp A, Sunderland M, Von Korff M, Ustun TB (2009) Normative data for the 12 item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. PLoS One 4: e8343.
    1. Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, et al. (2010) Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 88: 815–823.
    1. Sternberg SA, Wershof Schwartz A, Karunananthan S, Bergman H, Mark Clarfield A (2011) The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc 59: 2129–2138.
    1. Berrut G, Andrieu S, Araujo de Carvalho I, Baeyens JP, Bergman H, et al. (2013) Promoting access to innovation for frail old persons. IAGG (International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics), WHO (World Health Organization) and SFGG (Société Française de Gériatrie et de Gérontologie) Workshop—Athens January 20-21, 2012 Tool (GFST). J Nutr Health Aging 17: 688–693.
    1. Rockwood K, Bergman H (2012) FRAILTY: A Report from the 3(rd) Joint Workshop of IAGG/WHO/SFGG, Athens, January 2012. Can Geriatr J 15: 31–36.
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, et al. (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380: 2163–2196.
    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, et al. (2012) Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: A cross-sectional study. Lancet 380: 37–43.
    1. Li CM, Chen CY, Li CY, Wang WD, Wu SC (2010) The effectiveness of a comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention program for frailty in community-dwelling older people: A randomized, controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 50: S39–42.
    1. Van Craen K, Braes T, Wellens N, Denhaerynck K, Flamaing J, et al. (2010) The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 58: 83–92.
    1. McCusker J, Verdon J, Tousignant P, de Courval LP, Dendukuri N, et al. (2001) Rapid emergency department intervention for older people reduces risk of functional decline: Results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 49: 1272–1281.
    1. Lang PO, Zekry D, Michel JP, Drame M, Novella JL, et al. (2010) Early markers of prolonged hospital stay in demented inpatients: A multicentre and prospective study. J Nutr Health Aging 14: 141–147.
    1. Hoogerduijn JG, Schuurmans MJ, Duijnstee MS, de Rooij SE, Grypdonck MF (2007) A systematic review of predictors and screening instruments to identify older hospitalized patients at risk for functional decline. J Clin Nurs 16: 46–57.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res12: 189–198.
    1. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B (2000) The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology 55: 1621–1626.
    1. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL (1984) A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry 141: 1356–1364.
    1. Brown EC, Casey A, Fisch RI, Neuringer C (1958) Trail making test as a screening device for the detection of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 22: 469–474.
    1. Grober E, Buschke H, Crystal H, Bang S, Dresner R (1988) Screening for dementia by memory testing. Neurology 38: 900–903.
    1. Van der Linden M, Coyette F, Poitrenaud F, Kalafat M, Calicis F, et al... (2004) L′épreuve de rappel libre/rappel indicé à 16 items (RL/RI-16). In L′évaluation des troubles de la mémoire, (Eds. Solal), Marseille.
    1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, et al. (2004) Mild cognitive impairment—beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med 256: 240–246.
    1. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, et al. (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 34: 939–944.
    1. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC (1970) Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 10: 20–30.
    1. Pérès K, Chrysostome V, Fabrigoule C, Orgogozo JM, Dartigues JF, et al. (2006) Restriction in complex activities of daily living in MCI: Impact on outcome. Neurology 67: 461–466.
    1. Shah A, Herbert R, Lewis S, Mahendran R, Platt J, et al. (1997) Screening for depression among acutely ill geriatric inpatients with a short Geriatric Depression Scale. Age Ageing 26: 217–221.
    1. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Revel Delhom C, Berrut G, Belmin J, et al. (2011) How to manage recurrent falls in clinical practice: Guidelines of the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology. J Nutr Health Aging 15: 79–84.
    1. Popa-Wagner A, Buga AM, Popescu B, Muresanu D (2013). Vascular cognitive impairment, dementia, aging and energy demand. A vicious cycle. J Neural Transm [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Matthews FE, Arthur A, Barnes LE, Bond J, Jagger C, et al. (2013) A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: Results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet 382: 1405–1412.
    1. Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, et al. (2013) The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement 9: 63–75.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever