PDA+: A Personal Digital Assistant for Obesity Treatment - an RCT testing the use of technology to enhance weight loss treatment for veterans

Jennifer M Duncan, E Amy Janke, Andrea T Kozak, Megan Roehrig, Stephanie W Russell, H Gene McFadden, Andrew Demott, Alex Pictor, Don Hedeker, Bonnie Spring, Jennifer M Duncan, E Amy Janke, Andrea T Kozak, Megan Roehrig, Stephanie W Russell, H Gene McFadden, Andrew Demott, Alex Pictor, Don Hedeker, Bonnie Spring

Abstract

Background: Obese adults struggle to make the changes necessary to achieve even modest weight loss, though a decrease in weight by as little as 10% can have significant health benefits. Failure to meet weight loss goals may in part be associated with barriers to obesity treatment. Wide-spread dissemination of evidence-based obesity treatment faces multiple challenges including cost, access, and implementing the programmatic characteristics on a large scale.

Aims: The PDA+: A Personal Digital Assistant for Obesity Treatment randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to test whether a PDA-based behavioral intervention enhances the effectiveness of the existing group weight loss treatment program at VA Medical Centers Managing Overweight/Obese Veterans Everywhere (MOVE!). We also aim to introduce technology as a way to overcome systemic barriers of traditional obesity treatment.

Methods/design: Veterans enrolled in the MOVE! group at the Hines Hospital VAMC with BMI ≥ 25 and ≤ 40 and weigh < 400 pounds, experience chronic pain (≥ 4 on the NRS-I scale for ≥ 6 months prior to enrollment) and are able to participate in a moderate intensity exercise program will be recruited and screened for eligibility. Participants will be randomized to receive either: a) MOVE! treatment alone (Standard Care) or b) Standard Care plus PDA (PDA+). Those randomized to PDA+ will record dietary intake, physical activity, and weight on the PDA. In addition, they will also record mood and pain intensity, and receive biweekly telephone support for the first 6-months of the 12-month study. All participants will attend in-person lab sessions every three months to complete questionnaires and for the collection of anthropomorphic data. Weight loss and decrease in pain level intensity are the primary outcomes.

Discussion: The PDA+ trial represents an important step in understanding ways to improve the use of technology in obesity treatment. The trial will address barriers to obesity care by implementing effective behavioral components of a weight loss intervention and delivering high intensity, low cost obesity treatment. This RCT also tests an intervention approach supported by handheld technology in a population traditionally considered to have lower levels of technology literacy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00371462.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PDA+ Trial Phases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screen shot of the goal thermometers. The goal thermometers reflect the calories and moderate activity of a hypothetical participant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protocol Timeline. Participant progression through the study protocol

References

    1. McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton AJ, Lohr KN. Screening and Interventions for Obesity in Adults: Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):933–949.
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults: United States, Trends 1976-1980 Through 2007-2008. National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys; 2010.
    1. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Westman EC, Brandt KD. Relationship between obesity and health-related quality of life in men. Obes Res. 2002;10(10):1057–64. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.143.
    1. National Institutes of Health: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: North American Association for the Study of Obesity. The Practical Guide: Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. National Institutes of Health.NIH Publication No. 00-4084; 2000.
    1. CDC. Trends in leisure-time physical inactivity by age, sex, and race/ethnicity --- UnitedStates, 1994--2004. MMWR. 2005;54(39)
    1. CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The burden of chronic diseases and their riskfactors: National and state perspectives. 2002.
    1. Patrick K, Raab F, Adams MA, Dillon L, Zabinski M, Rock CL, Griswold WG, Norman GJ. A Text Message-Based Intervention for Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1100.
    1. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain L, Boucher JL, Histon T, Caplan W, Bowman JD, Pronk NP. Weight-Loss Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Weight Loss Clinical Trials with a Minimum 1-Year Follow Up. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107:1755–1767. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.017.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. 1998. NIH Publication No. 98-4083.
    1. Jain A. What works for obesity? A summary of the research behind obesity interventions. BMJ Publishing Group. 2004.
    1. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. CRD Report 10 Systematic review of interventions in the treatment and prevention of obesity. 1997.
    1. Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet Technology to Deliver a Behavioral Weight Loss Program. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1172–1177. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.9.1172.
    1. Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G. State-level estimates of annual medical expenditures attributable to obesity. Obes Res. 2004;12(1):18–24. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.4.
    1. Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will All Americans Become Overweight or Obese? Estimating the Progression and Cost of the US Obesity Epidemic. Obesity. 2008;16(10):2323–2330. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.351.
    1. Peltonen M, Lindroos AK, Torgerson JS. Musculoskeletal pain in the obese. Pain. 2003;104(3):549–57. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00091-5.
    1. Yancy WS, Olsen MK, Westman EC, Brandt KD. Relationship between obesity and health-related quality of life in men. Obes Res. 2002;10(10):1057–64. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.143.
    1. Mirtz TA, Greene L. Is obesity a risk factor for low back pain? Chiropr Osteopat. 2005;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-13-2.
    1. Yan LL, Daviglus ML, Liu K. et al.BMI and health-related quality of life in adults 65 years and older. Obes Res. 2004;12(1):69–76. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.10.
    1. Barofsky I, Fontaine KR, Cheskin LJ. Pain in the obese: impact on health-related quality-of-life. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19(4):408–10. doi: 10.1007/BF02895160.
    1. Tucker LA, Clegg AG. Differences in health care costs and utilization among adults with selected lifestyle-related factors. Am J Health Promot. 2002;16(4):225–33.
    1. Pronk NP, Tan AW, O'Connor P. Obesity, fitness, willingness to communicate and health care costs. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(11):1535–43. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199911000-00007.
    1. Popoola FA. Increase in obesity and health-care use, from the Health Survey for England, ages 50 to 69, 1998. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1258–62. doi: 10.1381/0960892042387138.
    1. Chrubasik S, Junck H, Zappe HA, Stutzke O. A survey on pain complaints and health care utilization in a German population. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15(4):397–408.
    1. Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, Hey L. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine. 2004;29(1):79–86. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000105527.13866.0F.
    1. Das SD, Kinsinger LS, Yancy WS. et al.Obesity prevalence among veterans at Veterans Affairs medical facilities. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:291–294. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.007.
    1. Sevick MA, Stone RA, Zickmund S, Wang Y, Korytkowski M, Burke LE. Factors associated with probability of personal digital assistant-based dietary self-monitoring in those with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2010;33(4):315–325. doi: 10.1007/s10865-010-9257-9.
    1. Helsel DL, Jakicic JM, Otto AD. Comparison of techniques for self-monitoring eating and exercise behaviors on weight loss in a correspondence-based intervention. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107:1807–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.014.
    1. Wanke KL, Daston C, Slonim A, Albert PS, Snyder K, Schatzkin A. et al.Adherence to the polyp prevention trial dietary intervention associated with a behavioral pattern of adherence to nondietary trial requirements and general health recommendation. Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137:391–398.
    1. Wing RR, Hill DR. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2001;21:323–341. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.323.
    1. McGuire MT, Wing RR, Klem MR, Lang W, Hill JO. What predicts weight regain in a group of successful weight losers? Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology. 1999;67:177–185. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.177.
    1. Elfhag K, Rossner S. Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obesity Reviews. 2005;6:67–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00170.x.
    1. Burke LE, Styn MA, Glanz K, Ewing LJ, Elci OU, Conroy MB. et al.SMART trial: A randomized clinical trial of self-monitoring in behavioral weight management-design and baseline findings. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2008;30:540–551. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.003.
    1. Glanz K, Murphy S, Moylan J, Evensen D, Curb JD. Improving Dietary Self-monitoring and Adherence With Hand-held Computers: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2006;20(3):165–170.
    1. Merriam PA, Yunsheng M, Olendzki BC, Schneider KL, Li W, Ockene IS, Pagoto SL. Design and methods for testing a simple dietary message to improve weight loss and dietary quality. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-87.
    1. Yon BA, Johnson RK, Harvey-Berino J, Gold BC, Howard AB. Personal digital assistants are comparable to traditional diaries for dietary self-monitoring during a weight-loss program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2007;30:165–175. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9092-1.
    1. Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technologies. Communications of the ACM. 1999;42(5):27–29. doi: 10.1145/301353.301396.
    1. Intille SS, Kukla C, Farzanfar R, Bakr W. Just-in-time technology to encourage incremental, dietary behavior change. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;874
    1. Burke LE, Starret T, Warziski M, Sereika S, Stark S, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring dietary intake: Current and future practices--Report of a pilot study using an electronic diary. Journal of Renal Nutrition. 2005;13:281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jrn.2005.04.002.
    1. Spring B, Schneider K, McFadden HG, Vaughn J, Kozak AT, Smith M, Hedeker D. Make Better Choices (MBC): study design of a randomized controlled trial testing optimal technology-supported change in multiple diet and physical activity risk behaviors. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:586–596. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-586.
    1. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2008;5:56. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56.
    1. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63:60–66.
    1. Kerns RD, Rosenberg R, Jamison RN, Caudill MA, Haythornthwaite J. Readiness to adopt a self-management approach to chronic pain: the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) Pain. 1997;72(1-2):227–34. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00038-9.
    1. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Kroenke K. et al.Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994;272:1749–1756. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.22.1749.
    1. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Pain. 1985;23:345–356. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1.
    1. Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure. Motivation and Emotion. 2005. pp. 83–102.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measure on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) Medical Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
    1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Quality & Performance Programs and Services. Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients in Ambulatory Care. 2005.
    1. Bunz U. The Computer-Email-Web (CEW) Fluency Scale-Development and Validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2004;17(4):479–506. doi: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1704_3.
    1. Department of Veterans Affairs & Department of Defense. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for screening and management of overweight and obesity. 2005.
    1. Harvey R, Burdick M, Yevich S, Jones KJ. Implementation of a national comprehensive weight management/physical activity program in VA outpatient settings. Obes Res. 2005;13S,A19:74–OR.
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD, Waternaux C. Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: comparing time-related contrasts between two groups. JSTOR. 1999;24:70–93.
    1. Fitzmaurice, Laird, Ware. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Wiley, New York; 2004.
    1. Schafter J. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York, Chapman and Hall; 1997.
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychol Methods. 1997;2:64–78. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.1.64.
    1. Little RJA. Modeling the dropout mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:1112–1121. doi: 10.2307/2291350.
    1. Kramer MK, Kriska AM, Venditti EM, Miller RG, Brooks MM, Burke LE, Siminerio LM, Solano FX, Orchard TJ. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program: a comprehensive model for prevention training and program delivery. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):505–11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.020.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever