Diabetic ketoacidosis presentations in a low socio-economic area: are services suitable?

Steven James, Kylie Annetts, Thuy Frakking, Marc Broadbent, John Waugh, Lin Perry, Julia Lowe, Sean Clark, Steven James, Kylie Annetts, Thuy Frakking, Marc Broadbent, John Waugh, Lin Perry, Julia Lowe, Sean Clark

Abstract

Background: Diabetic ketoacidosis causes a significant number of hospitalisations worldwide, with rates tending to increase with remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage. Our study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of factors affecting presentation of people with type 1 diabetes in a low socioeconomic area of Queensland, Australia.

Methods: This was a qualitative study. Individual semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were completed with patients with type 1 diabetes who had presented in diabetic ketoacidosis, and healthcare professionals who have experience in related care. Data were analysed using Gibbs's framework of thematic analysis.

Results: Four patients with type 1 diabetes and 18 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Restricted access was identified as a factor contributing to diabetic ketoacidosis and delayed presentation, with ketone testing supplies, continuous glucose monitoring technology and transport considered barriers. Many of these factors were arguably preventable. Opportunities to improve the care available to patients with type 1 diabetes were detailed, with particularly strong support for dedicated out of hours telephone help lines for adults with type 1 diabetes.

Conclusions: Gaps in support for patient self-care to avoid diabetic ketoacidosis presentations and prevent late presentation of diabetic ketoacidosis revealed by this study require service reconfiguration to support care delivery. Until change is made, people with type 1 diabetes will continue to make both avoidable and delayed, acutely unwell, presentations to Emergency Departments.

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes mellitus, type 1; Diabetes services; Diabetic ketoacidosis; Healthcare professionals; Socio-economic; Support; Telephone; Type 1 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

© 2021. The Author(s).

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2019.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Incidence of type 1 diabetes in Australia 2000–2013. Diabetes series no. 23. Cat. no. CVD 69. Canberra: Australian Government; 2015.
    1. James S. Current and future services to support young adults with type 1 diabetes in Australia. 2017.
    1. Dunning T, SInclair A. Care of people with diabetes. A manual for healthcare practice. 5. UK: Wiley; 2020.
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:S91–SS3.
    1. Australian Type 1 Diabetes Guidelines Expert Advisory Group . National evidence-based clinical care guidelines for type 1 diabetes in children, adolescents and adults. Canberra: Australian Government; 2011.
    1. Hua X, Carvalho N, Tew M, Huang E, Herman W, Clarke P. Expenditures and prices of Antihyperglycemic medications in the United States: 2002-2013. JAMA. 2016;315(13):1400–1401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0126.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) among children and young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes series no. 26. Cat. no. CVD 77. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016.
    1. Everett E, Mathioudakis N. Association of socioeconomic status and DKA readmission in adults with type 1 diabetes: analysis of the US National Readmission Database. BMJ Open Diab Res Care. 2019;7(1):1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000621.
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Moreton bay SEIFA, Available at: , Accssed 14 June 2019.
    1. Moreton Bay Regional Council . Community profile. 2016.
    1. Gibbs G. Analysing qualitative data. London: Sage Publications; 2012.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s health 2016. Australia’s health series no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 199. Canberra: AIHW; 2016.
    1. Mackenbach J. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in high-income countries: the facts and the options. In: Detels R, Gulliford M, Karim QA, Tan CC, editors. Oxford textbook of global public health. 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Hassan K, Loar R, Anderson B, Heptulla R. The role of socioeconomic status, depression, quality of life, and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 2006;149(4):526–531. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.05.039.
    1. Unwin N, Binns D, Elliott K, Kelly W. The relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and socio-economic status in people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 1996;13(1):72–79. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199601)13:1<72::AID-DIA21>;2-T.
    1. Nadas J, Putz Z, Fovenyi J, Gaal Z, Gyimesi A, Hidvegi T. Cardiometabolic risk and educational level in adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2009;46(2):159–162. doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0065-4.
    1. Shulman R, Stukel T, Miller F. Low socioeconomic status is associated with adverse events in children and teens on insulin pumps under a universal access program: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Diabet Res Care. 2016;4:e000239. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000239.
    1. Diabetes Australia . National Diabetes Services Scheme. 2020.
    1. Maldonado M, Chong E, Oehl M, Balasubramanyam A. Economic impact of diabetic ketoacidosis in a multiethnic indigent population. Analysis of costs based on the precipitating cause. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1265–1269. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1265.
    1. Desai D, Mehta D, Mathias P, Menon G, Schubart U. Health care utilization and burden of diabetic ketoacidosis in the U.S. over the past decade: a Nationwide analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(8):1631–1638. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1379.
    1. Dhatariya K, Skedgel CF, R. The cost of treating diabetic ketoacidosis in the UK: a national survey of hospital resource use. Diabet Med. 2017;34(10):1361–1366. doi: 10.1111/dme.13427.
    1. Queensland Ambulance Service . Queensland Ambulance Service. 2020.
    1. Alotaibi A, Perry L, Golizedah L, Al GA. Diabetes knowledge of nurses in different countries: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;39:32–49. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.017.
    1. NaidooI S, Mahomed O, Asmall S, Taylor M. Nurses’ knowledge of chronic disease management. Health SA Gesondheid. 2014;19(1):1–8.
    1. Victorian Government . Nurse-on-call. 2018.
    1. Government of Western Australia . Rural link. 2019.
    1. Farrell K, Holmes-Walker D. Mobile phone support is associated with reduced ketoacidosis in young adults. Diabet Med. 2011;28:1001–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03302.x.
    1. Hare M, Deitch J, Kang M, Bach L. Clinical, psychological and demographic factors in a contemporary adult cohort with diabetic ketoacidosis and type 1 diabetes. Int Med J. 2020. 10.1111/imj.14877.
    1. Hamblin P, Abdul-Wahab A, Xu S, Steele C, Vogrin S. Diabetic ketoacidosis: a canary in the mine for mental health disorders? Int Med J. 2021. 10.1111/imj.15214.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever