The Efficacy and Safety of Evekeo, Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Laboratory Classroom Study

Abstract

Objective: The study goal was to determine the efficacy and safety of an optimal dose of Evekeo, racemic amphetamine sulfate, 1:1 d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine (R-AMPH), compared to placebo in treating children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a laboratory classroom setting.

Methods: A total of 107 children ages 6-12 years were enrolled in this multicenter, dose-optimized, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. After 8 weeks of open-label dose optimization, 97 subjects were randomized to 2 weeks of double-blind treatment in the sequence of R-AMPH followed by placebo (n=47) or placebo followed by R-AMPH (n=50). Efficacy measures included the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale and Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) administered predose and at 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours postdose on 2 laboratory classroom days. Safety assessments included physical examination, chemistry, hematology, vital signs, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results: Compared to placebo, a single daily dose of R-AMPH significantly improved SKAMP-Combined scores (p<0.0001) at each time point tested throughout the laboratory classroom days, with effect onset 45 minutes postdose and extending through 10 hours. R-AMPH significantly improved PERMP number of problems attempted and correct (p<0.0001) throughout the laboratory classroom days. During the twice-daily dose-optimization open-label phase, improvements were observed with R-AMPH in scores of the ADHD-Rating Scale IV and Clinical Global Impressions Severity and Improvement Scales. TEAEs and changes in vital signs associated with R-AMPH were generally mild and not unexpected. The most common TEAEs in the open-label phase were decreased appetite (27.6%), upper abdominal pain (14.3%), irritability (14.3%), and headache (13.3%).

Conclusions: Compared to placebo, R-AMPH was effective in treating children aged 6-12 years with ADHD, beginning at 45 minutes and continuing through 10 hours postdose, and was well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01986062. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01986062.

Figures

FIG. 1.

R-AMPH laboratory classroom trial design.

FIG. 2.

Subject disposition in the R-AMPH laboratory classroom study.

FIG. 3.

Laboratory classroom SKAMP-Combined scores. SKAMP, Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham.

FIG. 4.

PERMP number of problems attempted over time by treatment group. PERMP, Permanent Product Measure of Performance.

FIG. 5.

PERMP number of problems correct over time by treatment group. PERMP, Permanent Product Measure of Performance.

FIG. 6.

Mean (SE) ADHD-RS-IV total scores in the open-label phase of the study. ADHD-RS-IV, ADHD-Rating Scale IV.

FIG. 7.

Mean (SD) CGI-S scores in the open-label phase of the study. The CGI-S classifies current disease state as follows: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill subjects; CGI-S, Clinical Global Impressions–Severity.

FIG. 8.

Percentage of subjects either “much” or “very much” improved based on the CGI-I scale in the open-label phase of the study. The CGI-I classifies subject improvement as follows: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse; CGI-I, Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement.