Associations of ultra-processed food intake with maternal weight change and cardiometabolic health and infant growth

Jenna R Cummings, Leah M Lipsky, Carolina Schwedhelm, Aiyi Liu, Tonja R Nansel, Jenna R Cummings, Leah M Lipsky, Carolina Schwedhelm, Aiyi Liu, Tonja R Nansel

Abstract

Background: Excessive intake of ultra-processed foods, formulated from substances extracted from foods or derived from food constituents, may be a modifiable behavioral risk factor for adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Prior work has predominately examined health correlates of maternal ultra-processed food intake in populations with substantially lower ultra-processed food intake compared to the US population. This longitudinal study investigated relations of ultra-processed food intake with maternal weight change and cardiometabolic health and infant growth in a US cohort.

Methods: Mothers in the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study were enrolled at ≤12 weeks gestation and completed multiple 24-Hour Dietary Recalls within six visit windows through one-year postpartum (458 mothers enrolled, 321 retained at one-year postpartum). The NOVA (not an acronym) system categorized food and underlying ingredient codes based on processing level. Maternal anthropometrics were measured throughout pregnancy and postpartum, and infant anthropometrics were measured at birth and ages 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Maternal cardiometabolic markers were analyzed from blood samples obtained during the second and third trimesters.

Results: Holding covariates and total energy intake constant, a 1-SD greater percent energy intake from ultra-processed foods during pregnancy was associated with 31% higher odds of excessive gestational weight gain (p = .045, 95% CI [1.01, 1.70]), 0.68±0.29 mg/L higher c-reactive protein during pregnancy (p = .021, 95% CI [0.10, 1.26]), 6.7±3.4% greater gestational weight gain retained (p = .049, 95% CI [0.03, 13.30]), and 1.09±0.36 kg greater postpartum weight retention (p = .003, 95% CI [0.38, 1.80]). No other significant associations emerged.

Conclusions: Ultra-processed food intake during pregnancy may be a modifiable behavioral risk factor for adverse maternal weight outcomes and inflammation. Randomized controlled trials are needed to test whether targeting ultra-processed food intake during pregnancy may support optimal maternal health.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov. Registration ID - NCT02217462 . Date of registration - August 13, 2014.

Keywords: Cardiometabolic health; Infant weight-for-length; Maternal weight change; Postpartum; Pregnancy; Ultra-processed food.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow Diagram of the number of mothers at each study stage

References

    1. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, Moubarac J-C, Louzada ML, Rauber F, et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(5):936–941. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003762.
    1. Chen X, Zhang Z, Yang H, Qiu P, Wang H, Wang F, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Nutr J. 2020;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00604-1.
    1. Kominiarek MA, Peaceman AM. Gestational weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):642–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.040.
    1. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Llancet. 2013;382(9890):427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
    1. Spahn JM, Callahan EH, Spill MK, Wong YP, Benjamin-Neelon SE, Birch L, et al. Influence of maternal diet on flavor transfer to amniotic fluid and breast milk and children's responses: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2019;109(Supplement_1):1003S-26S.
    1. Silva CF, Saunders C, Peres W, Folino B, Kamel T, Dos Santos MS, et al. Effect of ultra-processed foods consumption on glycemic control and gestational weight gain in pregnant with pregestational diabetes mellitus using carbohydrate counting. PeerJ. 2021;9:e10514. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10514.
    1. de Barros GC, Malta MB, Benício MHDA, Carvalhaes MABL. Consumption of ultra-processed foods in the third gestational trimester and increased weight gain: a brazilian cohort study. Public Health Nutr. 2020:1–9.
    1. Silva CA, Santos IS, Shivappa N, Hebert JR, Crivellenti LC, Sartorelli DS. The role of food processing in the inflammatory potential of diet during pregnancy. Rev Saude Publica. 2019;53.
    1. Amorim N, Silva A, Rebouças A, Bezerra D, Lima M, Pires J, et al. Dietary share of ultra-processed foods and its association with vitamin E biomarkers in Brazilian lactating women. Br J Nutr. 2021;1-23.
    1. de Melo JMM, Dourado BLLFS, de Menezes RCE, Longo-Silva G, da Silveira JAC. Early onset of overweight among children from low-income families: The role of exclusive breastfeeding and maternal intake of ultra-processed food. Pediatric Obesity. 2021:e12825.
    1. Rohatgi KW, Tinius RA, Cade WT, Steele EM, Cahill AG, Parra DC. Relationships between consumption of ultra-processed foods, gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in a sample of US pregnant women. PeerJ. 2017;5:e4091. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4091.
    1. Nansel TR, Lipsky LM, Siega-Riz AM, Burger K, Faith M, Liu A. Pregnancy eating attributes study (PEAS): a cohort study examining behavioral and environmental influences on diet and weight change in pregnancy and postpartum. BMC Nutr. 2016;2.
    1. Nansel TR, Lipsky LM, Burger K, Faith M, Nicholson W, Stuebe A, et al. Reward-related eating, self-regulation, and weight change in pregnancy and postpartum: the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study (PEAS) Int J Obes (Lond) 2020;44(12):2444–2454. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00685-2.
    1. Kirkpatrick SI, Subar AF, Douglass D, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Kahle LL, et al. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):233–240. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.083238.
    1. Rhee JJ, Sampson L, Cho E, Hughes MD, Hu FB, Willett WC. Comparison of methods to account for implausible reporting of energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(4):225–233. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu308.
    1. Most J, Dervis S, Haman F, Adamo KB, Redman LM. Energy intake requirements in pregnancy. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1812. doi: 10.3390/nu11081812.
    1. Steele EM, Baraldi LG, da Costa Louzada ML, Moubarac J-C, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e009892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892.
    1. McGowan CA, McAuliffe FM. Maternal dietary patterns and associated nutrient intakes during each trimester of pregnancy. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(1):97–107. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000997.
    1. Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Willett WC, Kleinman KP, Oken E, Gillman MW. Changes in dietary intake from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(1):35–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00691.x.
    1. Savard C, Lemieux S, Carbonneau É, Provencher V, Gagnon C, Robitaille J, et al. Trimester-specific assessment of diet quality in a sample of Canadian pregnant women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3):311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030311.
    1. Martínez Steele E, Khandpur N, da Costa Louzada ML, Monteiro CA. Association between dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods and urinary concentrations of phthalates and bisphenol in a nationally representative sample of the US population aged 6 years and older. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236738.
    1. Olson CM, Strawderman MS. Modifiable behavioral factors in a biopsychosocial model predict inadequate and excessive gestational weight gain. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(1):48–54. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50001.
    1. Holland E, Moore Simas TA, Doyle Curiale DK, Liao X, Waring ME. Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight versus weight measured at first prenatal visit: effects on categorization of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(10):1872–1878. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1210-9.
    1. Rasmussen K, Yaktine A. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines (Eds.).(2009). Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines
    1. Paxton A, Lederman SA, Heymsfield SB, Wang J, Thornton JC, Pierson RN., Jr Anthropometric equations for studying body fat in pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67(1):104–110. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/67.1.104.
    1. Christian LM, Porter K. Longitudinal changes in serum proinflammatory markers across pregnancy and postpartum: effects of maternal body mass index. Cytokine. 2014;70(2):134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.06.018.
    1. Vrijkotte TG, Krukziener N, Hutten BA, Vollebregt KC, van Eijsden M, Twickler MB. Maternal lipid profile during early pregnancy and pregnancy complications and outcomes: the ABCD study. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2012;97(11):3917–3925. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1295.
    1. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, et al. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002;246:1–190.
    1. Evenson KR, Wen F. National trends in self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviors among pregnant women: NHANES 1999–2006. Prev Med. 2010;50(3):123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.12.015.
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2000;32(9; SUPP/1):S498–S504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009.
    1. Bureau USC. Poverty Thresholds 2016. Available from: .
    1. Hickling S, Hung J, Knuiman M, Divitini M, Beilby J. Are the associations between diet and C-reactive protein independent of obesity? Prev Med. 2008;47(1):71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.007.
    1. Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metab. 2019;30(1):67–77. e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008.
    1. Steele EM, Popkin BM, Swinburn B, Monteiro CA. The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. Popul Health Metr. 2017;15(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0118-9.
    1. Steele EM, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ, Baraldi LG, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods, protein leverage and energy intake in the USA. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):114–124. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001574.
    1. Travinsky-Shmul T, Beresh O, Zaretsky J, Griess-Fishheimer S, Rozner R, Kalev-Altman R, Penn S, Shahar R, Monsonego-Ornan E. Ultra-processed food impairs bone quality, increases marrow adiposity and alters gut microbiome in mice. Foods. 2021;10(12):3107. doi: 10.3390/foods10123107.
    1. Prentice RL, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Huang Y, Van Horn L, Beresford SA, Caan B, et al. Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(5):591–603. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr140.
    1. Braesco V, Souchon I, Sauvant P, Haurogné T, Maillot M, Féart C, Darmon N. Ultra-processed foods: how functional is the NOVA system? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;21:1–9.
    1. Gibney MJ, Forde CG, Mullally D, Gibney ER. Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(3):717–724.
    1. Messina M, Sievenpiper JL, Williamson P, Kiel J, Erdman JW. Perspective: Soy-based meat and dairy alternatives, despite classification as ultra-processed foods, deliver high-quality nutrition on par with unprocessed or minimally processed animal-based counterparts. Adv Nutr. 2022. 10.1093/advances/nmac026.
    1. Adams J, Hofman K, Moubarac JC, Thow AM. Public health response to ultra-processed food and drinks. BMJ. 2020;26:369.
    1. de Barros Gomes C, Malta MB, da Costa Louzada ML, Benício MHDA, Barros AJ, Carvalhaes MA. Ultra-processed food consumption by pregnant women: the effect of an educational intervention with health professionals. Matern Child Health J 2019;23(5):692-703.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever