Using Mobile Phones to Collect Patient Data: Lessons Learned From the SIMPle Study

Sinead Duane, Meera Tandan, Andrew W Murphy, Akke Vellinga, Sinead Duane, Meera Tandan, Andrew W Murphy, Akke Vellinga

Abstract

Background: Mobile phones offer new opportunities to efficiently and interactively collect real-time data from patients with acute illnesses, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs). One of the main benefits of using mobile data collection methods is automated data upload, which can reduce the chance of data loss, an issue when using other data collection methods such as paper-based surveys.

Objective: The aim was to explore differences in collecting data from patients with UTI using text messaging, a mobile phone app (UTI diary), and an online survey. This paper provides lessons learned from integrating mobile data collection into a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Participants included UTI patients consulting in general practices that were participating in the Supporting the Improvement and Management of UTI (SIMPle) study. SIMPle was designed to improve prescribing antimicrobial therapies for UTI in the community. Patients were invited to reply to questions regarding their UTI either via a prospective text message survey, a mobile phone app (UTI diary), or a retrospective online survey. Data were collected from 329 patients who opted in to the text message survey, 71 UTI patients through the mobile phone UTI symptom diary app, and 91 online survey participants.

Results: The age profile of UTI diary app users was younger than that of the text message and online survey users. The largest dropout for both the text message survey respondents and UTI diary app users was after the initial opt-in message; once the participants completed question 1 of the text message survey or day 2 in the UTI diary app, they were more likely to respond to the remaining questions/days.

Conclusions: This feasibility study highlights the potential of using mobile data collection methods to capture patient data. As well as improving the efficiency of data collection, these novel approaches highlight the advantage of collecting data in real time across multiple time points. There was little variation in the number of patients responding between text message survey, UTI diary, and online survey, but more patients participated in the text message survey than the UTI diary app. The choice between designing a text message survey or UTI diary app will depend on the age profile of patients and the type of information the researchers' desire.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01913860; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01913860 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6pfgCztgT).

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; mobile phone apps; mobile survey; prescribing; primary care; quantitative; urinary tract infection.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Sinead Duane, Meera Tandan, Andrew W Murphy, Akke Vellinga. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 25.04.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data collection procedures for the SIMPIe study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshots of the UTI diary app.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Summary of sampling frame.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Severity symptoms rated by apps participants from days 1 to 5 (n=71).

References

    1. Gaggioli A, Pioggia G, Tartarisco G, Baldus G, Corda D, Cipresso P, Riva G. A mobile data collection platform for mental health research. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2011 Sep 30;17(2):241–251. doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0465-2.
    1. Hall A, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:393–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855.
    1. Labrique A, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Aug;1(2):160–171. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031.
    1. Eurostat Pocketbooks: Key Figures on Europe. 2012 Edition. Luxemberg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012.
    1. Comreg . Irish Communications Market: Quarterly Key Data Report. Dublin, Ireland: Comreg; 2011.
    1. Consumer Barometer. 2016. [2016-02-10]. Trending data .
    1. Statista. 2015. [2017-04-04]. Number of mobile app downloads worldwide from 2009 to 2017
    1. Dale O, Hagen KB. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.005.
    1. Oldenburg B, Taylor CB, O'Neil A, Cocker F, Cameron LD. Using new technologies to improve the prevention and management of chronic conditions in populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:483–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122848.
    1. Shen H. Smartphones set to boost large-scale health studies. Nature. 2015 Mar 10;:1. doi: 10.1038/nature.2015.17083.
    1. Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014 May;39(5):356–364.
    1. Baerheim A, Digranes A, Jureen R, Malterud K. Generalized symptoms in adult women with acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection: an observational study. MedGenMed. 2003 Jul 01;5(3):1.
    1. Duane S, Callan A, Galvin S, Murphy AW, Domegan C, O'Shea E, Cormican M, Bennett K, O'Donnell M, Vellinga A. Supporting the improvement and management of prescribing for urinary tract infections (SIMPle): protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2013 Dec 23;14:441. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-441.
    1. Vellinga A, Galvin S, Duane S, Callan A, Bennett K, Cormican M, Domegan C, Murphy AW. Intervention to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection: a cluster randomized trial. Can Med Assoc J. 2015 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150601.
    1. Ben-Zeev D, McHugo GJ, Xie H, Dobbins K, Young MA. Comparing retrospective reports to real-time/real-place mobile assessments in individuals with schizophrenia and a nonclinical comparison group. Schizophr Bull. 2012 May;38(3):396–404. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr171.
    1. Watson L, Little P, Moore M, Warner G, Williamson I. Validation study of a diary for use in acute lower respiratory tract infection. Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;18(5):553–554.
    1. Little P, Merriman R, Turner S, Rumsby K, Warner G, Lowes J, Smith H, Hawke C, Leydon G, Mullee M, Moore MV. Presentation, pattern, and natural course of severe symptoms, and role of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among patients presenting with suspected uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 2010 Feb 05;340:b5633.
    1. McNulty CA, Richards J, Livermore DM, Little P, Charlett A, Freeman E, Harvey I, Thomas M. Clinical relevance of laboratory-reported antibiotic resistance in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Nov;58(5):1000–1008. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl368.
    1. Vik I, Bollestad M, Grude N, Bærheim A, Mölstad S, Bjerrum L, Lindbæk M. Ibuprofen versus mecillinam for uncomplicated cystitis--a randomized controlled trial study protocol. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 17;14:693. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0693-y.
    1. Gágyor I, Bleidorn J, Kochen M, Schmiemann G, Wegscheider K, Hummers-Pradier E. Ibuprofen versus fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 Dec 23;351:h6544.
    1. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Apr;24(2):182–199.
    1. Shiffman S, Hufford M, Hickcox M, Paty JA, Gnys M, Kassel JD. Remember that? A comparison of real-time versus retrospective recall of smoking lapses. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Apr;65(2):292–300.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever