Domiciliary VR-Based Therapy for Functional Recovery and Cortical Reorganization: Randomized Controlled Trial in Participants at the Chronic Stage Post Stroke

Belén Rubio Ballester, Jens Nirme, Irene Camacho, Esther Duarte, Susana Rodríguez, Ampar Cuxart, Armin Duff, Paul F M J Verschure, Belén Rubio Ballester, Jens Nirme, Irene Camacho, Esther Duarte, Susana Rodríguez, Ampar Cuxart, Armin Duff, Paul F M J Verschure

Abstract

Background: Most stroke survivors continue to experience motor impairments even after hospital discharge. Virtual reality-based techniques have shown potential for rehabilitative training of these motor impairments. Here we assess the impact of at-home VR-based motor training on functional motor recovery, corticospinal excitability and cortical reorganization.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the effects of home-based VR-based motor rehabilitation on (1) cortical reorganization, (2) corticospinal tract, and (3) functional recovery after stroke in comparison to home-based occupational therapy.

Methods: We conducted a parallel-group, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of domiciliary VR-based therapy with occupational therapy in inducing motor recovery of the upper extremities. A total of 35 participants with chronic stroke underwent 3 weeks of home-based treatment. A group of subjects was trained using a VR-based system for motor rehabilitation, while the control group followed a conventional therapy. Motor function was evaluated at baseline, after the intervention, and at 12-weeks follow-up. In a subgroup of subjects, we used Navigated Brain Stimulation (NBS) procedures to measure the effect of the interventions on corticospinal excitability and cortical reorganization.

Results: Results from the system's recordings and clinical evaluation showed significantly greater functional recovery for the experimental group when compared with the control group (1.53, SD 2.4 in Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory). However, functional improvements did not reach clinical significance. After the therapy, physiological measures obtained from a subgroup of subjects revealed an increased corticospinal excitability for distal muscles driven by the pathological hemisphere, that is, abductor pollicis brevis. We also observed a displacement of the centroid of the cortical map for each tested muscle in the damaged hemisphere, which strongly correlated with improvements in clinical scales.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that, in chronic stages, remote delivery of customized VR-based motor training promotes functional gains that are accompanied by neuroplastic changes.

Trial registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number NCT02699398 (Archived by ClinicalTrials.gov at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02699398?term=NCT02699398&rank=1).

Keywords: computer applications software; hemiparesis; movement disorder; physical therapy; recovery of function, neuroplasticity; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: PV is involved in the spin-off company Eodyne Systems SL, which has the goal to achieve a large-scale distribution of science based rehabilitation technologies.

©Belén Rubio Ballester, Jens Nirme, Irene Camacho, Esther Duarte, Susana Rodríguez, Ampar Cuxart, Armin Duff, Paul F.M.J. Verschure. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (http://games.jmir.org), 07.08.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental setup and protocol: (A) Movements of the user’s upper limbs are captured and mapped onto an avatar displayed on a screen in first person perspective so that the user sees the movements of the virtual upper extremities. A pair of data gloves equipped with bend sensors captures finger flexion. (B) The Spheroids is divided into three subtasks: hit, grasp, and place. A white separator line divides the workspace in a paretic and non-paretic zone only allowing for ipsilateral movements.(C) The experimental protocol. Evaluation periods (Eval.) indicate clinical evaluations using standard clinical scales and Navigated Brain Stimulation procedures (NBS). These evaluations took place before the first session (W0), after the last session of the treatment (day 15, W3), and at follow-up (week 12, W12).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Navigated Brain Stimulation (NBS) procedure. Bottom right: axial and coronal view of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at the level of the stroke for one of the participants in the experimental group showing a partial anterior circulation infarct due to an embolism. Bottom right: Example of NBS mapped cortical motor representations; colored areas indicate the targeted cortical sites.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A: AEMF captures an improvement in finger flexion during treatment. Averaged movement profile of fingers excursion performed by one subject during one of the sessions. Units of finger flexion are expressed as a ratio of complete flexion. B: Mean changes in maximal finger flexion for all subjects in the RGS group across the three weeks of intervention, for both non-paretic (NPL) and paretic limbs (PL).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of domiciliary rehabilitation therapy on corticospinal efficacy. (A) Change in mean Stimulation Efficacy for extensor-carpi radialis (ECR) in the damaged hemisphere (pathological) and the intact hemisphere (non-pathological). (B) Change in mean Stimulation Efficacy for abductor pollicis brevis (APB). (C) Centroid displacements after therapy along anterioposterior and mediolateral axis. (D) Correlation of absolute centroid displacements after therapy with improvement in CAHAI score after therapy.

References

    1. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1989 Jun 01;20(6):766–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.6.766.
    1. Lai S, Studenski S, Duncan P, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1840–4.
    1. Shaughnessy M, Resnick B, Macko R. Testing a model of post-stroke exercise behavior. Rehabil Nurs. 2006;31(1):15–21.
    1. Hopman W, Verner J. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2003 Feb 13;34(3):801–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057978.15397.6F.
    1. Anderson C, Mhurchu C, Rubenach S, Clark M, Spencer C, Winsor A. Home or hospital for stroke Rehabilitation? results of a randomized controlled trial : II: cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Stroke. 2000 May;31(5):1032–7.
    1. Widén HL, von KL, Kostulas V, Holm M, Widsell G, Tegler H, Johansson K, Almazán J, de Pedro-Cuesta J. A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm. Stroke. 1998 Mar;29(3):591–7.
    1. Simpson L, Eng J, Chan M. H-GRASP: the feasibility of an upper limb home exercise program monitored by phone for individuals post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(9):874–82. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1162853.
    1. Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Gayton D, Carlton J, Buttery J, Tamblyn R. There's no place like home : an evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke. Stroke. 2000 May;31(5):1016–23.
    1. Garrido NJ, Ruiz PV, Lozano PM. Movement-based interaction applied to physical rehabilitation therapies. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 09;16(12):e281. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3154.
    1. Hillier S, Inglis-Jassiem G. Rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with stroke: home or centre based? a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2010 Jun;5(3):178–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00427.x.
    1. Rose F, Brooks B, Rizzo A. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 Jun;8(3):241–62; discussion 263. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241.
    1. Lewis G, Rosie J. Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitation in neurological conditions: how do we meet the needs and expectations of the users? Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1880–6. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.670036.
    1. Cameirão MS, Badia SB, Duarte E, Frisoli A, Verschure PF. The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2720–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.653196.
    1. McEwen D, Taillon-Hobson A, Bilodeau M, Sveistrup H, Finestone H. Virtual reality exercise improves mobility after stroke: an inpatient randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2014 Jun;45(6):1853–5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005362.
    1. Rizzo A. Virtual reality and disability: emergence and challenge. ‎Disabil Rehabil. 2009 Jul 07;24(11-12):567–9. doi: 10.1080/09638280110111315.
    1. Cameirão MS, Badia SB, Oller ED, Verschure PF. Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based rehabilitation gaming system: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Sep 22;7:48. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-48.
    1. Dickstein R, Deutsch J. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2007 Jul;87(7):942–53. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060331.
    1. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, Hu Q, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):126–36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2350-6.
    1. Nirme J, Duff A, Verschure PF. Adaptive rehabilitation gaming system: on-line individualization of stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6749–52. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091665.
    1. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the classic work on how to achieve happiness. London: Rider; 2002.
    1. Gladstone D, Danells C, Black S. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Sep;16(3):232–40. doi: 10.1177/154596802401105171.
    1. Barreca S, Stratford P, Lambert C, Masters L, Streiner D. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1616–22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.017.
    1. Collin C, Wade D, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–3.
    1. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206–7.
    1. Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, Harrold J, Nielsen DH. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. Phys Ther. 1987 Sep;67(9):1342–7.
    1. Knesevich JW, Biggs JT, Clayton PJ, Ziegler VE. Validity of the Hamilton rating Scale for depression. Br J Psychiatry. 1977 Jul;131:49–52.
    1. Bijur P, Silver W, Gallagher E. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153–7.
    1. Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin. 2010 Mar;40(1):7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2010.01.006.
    1. Dunlap W, Cortina JM, Vaslow J, Burke M. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. ‎Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):170–7. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170.
    1. Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E, Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998 Jun 26;250(1):5–8.
    1. Coupar F, Pollock A, Legg LA, Sackley C, van Vliet P. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD006755. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006755.pub2.
    1. Murphy T, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Dec;10(12):861–72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2735.
    1. Nudo R, Milliken G, Jenkins W, Merzenich M. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785–807.
    1. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor recovery and compensation mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):313–9. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328727.
    1. Zhu LL, Lindenberg R, Alexander MP, Schlaug G. Lesion load of the corticospinal tract predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2010 May;41(5):910–5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577023.
    1. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;115(9):2144–50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.001.
    1. Kim Y, You SH, Ko M, Park J, Lee KH, Jang SH, Yoo W, Hallett M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1471–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221233.55497.51.
    1. Yu X, Song R, Jiaerken Y, Yuan L, Huang P, Lou M, Jiang Q, Zhang M. White matter injury induced by diabetes in acute stroke is clinically relevant: a preliminary study. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2017 Jan;14(1):40–6. doi: 10.1177/1479164116675491.
    1. Sung H, You S, Hallett M, Yun W, Park C, Cho S. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: An experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(11):2218–23.
    1. Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Mirrored feedback in chronic stroke: recruitment and effective connectivity of ipsilesional sensorimotor networks. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 May;28(4):344–54. doi: 10.1177/1545968313513074.
    1. Clough J, Kernell D, Phillips C. The distribution of monosynaptic excitation from the pyramidal tract and from primary spindle afferents to motoneurones of the baboon's hand and forearm. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(1):145–66.
    1. Colebatch J, Gandevia S. The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain. 1989 Jun;112 (Pt 3):749–63.
    1. Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, Wee SW, Kuah CW, Chua KS, Gassert R, Milner TE, Teo CL, Burdet E. Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Nov 16;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-63.
    1. Cameirão MS, Badia SB, Duarte E, Frisoli A, Verschure PF. The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2720–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.653196.
    1. Michaelsen S, Dannenbaum R, Levin M. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):186–92. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196940.20446.c9.
    1. Tunik E, Saleh S, Bagce H, Merians A, Adamovich SV. Mirror feedback in virtual reality elicits ipsilesional motor cortex activation in chronic stroke patients. Int Conf Virtual Rehabilitation ICVR; 2011; Zurich. 2011. Jun 27,
    1. Seitz R, Huang Y, Knorr U, Tellmann L, Herzog H, Freund H J. Large-scale plasticity of the human motor cortex. Neuroreport. 1995 Mar 27;6(5):742–4.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever