Assessment of Free-Living Cadence Using ActiGraph Accelerometers Between Individuals With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Caroline M Lisee, Alexander H K Montoye, Noble F Lewallen, Mayrena Hernandez, David R Bell, Christopher M Kuenze, Caroline M Lisee, Alexander H K Montoye, Noble F Lewallen, Mayrena Hernandez, David R Bell, Christopher M Kuenze

Abstract

Context: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and gait speed are risk factors for developing knee osteoarthritis (OA). Measuring minute-level cadence during free-living activities may aid in identifying individuals at elevated risk of developing slow habitual gait speed and, in the long term, OA.

Objective: To assess differences in peak 1-minute cadence and weekly time in different cadence intensities between individuals with and without ACLR.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Short-term, free-living conditions.

Patients or other participants: A total of 57 participants with ACLR (34 women, 23 men; age = 20.9 ± 3.2 years, time since surgery = 28.7 ± 17.7 months) and 42 healthy control participants (22 women, 20 men; age = 20.7 ± 1.7 years).

Main outcome measure(s): Each participant wore a physical activity monitor for 7 days. Data were collected at 30 Hz, processed in 60-second epochs, and included in the analyses if the activity monitor was worn for at least 10 hours per day over 4 days. Mean daily steps, peak 1-minute cadence, and weekly minutes spent at 60 to 79 (slow walking), 80 to 99 (medium walking), 100 to 119 (brisk walking), ≥100 (moderate- to vigorous-intensity ambulation), and ≥130 (vigorous-intensity ambulation) steps per minute were calculated. One-way analyses of covariance were conducted to determine differences between groups, controlling for height and activity-monitor wear time.

Results: Those with ACLR took fewer daily steps (8422 ± 2663 versus 10 033 ± 3046 steps; P = .005) and spent fewer weekly minutes in moderate- to vigorous-intensity cadence (175.8 ± 116.5 minutes versus 218.5 ± 137.1 minutes; P = .048) than participants without ACLR. We observed no differences in minutes spent at slow (ACLR = 77.4 ± 40.5 minutes versus control = 83.9 ± 34.3 minutes; P = .88), medium (ACLR = 71.6 ± 40.2 minutes versus control = 82.9 ± 46.8 minutes; P = .56), brisk (ACLR = 115.3 ± 70.3 minutes versus control = 138.3 ± 73.3 minutes; P = .18), or vigorous-intensity (ACLR = 24.3 ± 36.5 minutes versus control = 38.1 ± 60.9 minutes; P = .10) cadences per week.

Conclusions: Participants with ACLR walked approximately 40 fewer minutes per week in moderate- to vigorous-intensity cadence than participants without ACLR. Increasing the time spent at cadence ≥100 steps per minute and overall volume of physical activity may be useful as interventional targets to help reduce the risk of early development of OA after ACLR.

Keywords: knee; osteoarthritis; physical activity; step accumulation; walking gait.

© by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Average step count (steps per day) and time spent in moderate- to vigorous-intensity cadence (steps per minute) among individuals with and those without a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The horizontal line indicates the median value, the box represents the interquartile range, and the dots represent individual outcomes.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever