Pharmacokinetics of plasma lopinavir/ritonavir following the administration of 400/100 mg, 200/150 mg and 200/50 mg twice daily in HIV-negative volunteers

Akil Jackson, Andrew Hill, Rebekah Puls, Laura Else, Janaki Amin, David Back, Enmoore Lin, Saye Khoo, Sean Emery, Roland Morley, Brian Gazzard, Marta Boffito, Akil Jackson, Andrew Hill, Rebekah Puls, Laura Else, Janaki Amin, David Back, Enmoore Lin, Saye Khoo, Sean Emery, Roland Morley, Brian Gazzard, Marta Boffito

Abstract

Objectives: Data suggest that some licensed antiretroviral doses could be reduced. We assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir at doses of 400/100, 200/150 and 200/50 mg twice daily in HIV-negative volunteers (https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00985543).

Methods: Male and female volunteers were administered lopinavir/ritonavir at doses of 400/100 mg (two lopinavir/ritonavir Meltrex 200/50 mg tablets, Regimen 1), 200/150 mg (one Meltrex tablet, one 100 mg ritonavir capsule, Regimen 2) and 200/50 mg (one Meltrex tablet, Regimen 3). Each dose was given twice daily for 7 days sequentially, separated by a 7 day wash-out period. Lopinavir/ritonavir steady-state pharmacokinetics was assessed over 12 h at the end of each phase (days 7, 21 and 35). Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using the 400/100 mg twice daily dose as reference, by determining geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals.

Results: Twenty-two subjects (eight females) completed the study. Lopinavir AUC(0-12) (ng h/mL), C(max) (ng/mL) and the minimum concentration (C(trough)) (ng/mL) for the 400/100, 200/150 and 200/50 mg twice daily doses, respectively, were as follows: 99,599, 73,603 and 45,146; 11,965, 8939 and 6404; and 5776, 4293 and 1749. Lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly lower for Regimens 2 and 3: GMR (90% CI) AUC(0-12), 0.74 (0.65-0.84) and 0.45 (0.40-0.51); C(max), 0.75 (0.66-0.85) and 0.54 (0.40-0.60); and C(trough), 0.74 (0.62-0.89) and 0.30 (0.25-0.36), respectively. All subjects taking the 400/100 and 200/150 mg twice daily doses, and 19 (86%) subjects taking 200/50 mg twice daily had lopinavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 1000 ng/mL.

Conclusions: These pharmacokinetic data show that therapeutic plasma concentrations of lopinavir can be achieved with 200/150 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (one Meltrex tablet and one 100 mg ritonavir capsule twice daily).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steady-state lopinavir plasma concentrations illustrated as GMs and 90% CIs measured during the intake of the three different regimens: 400/100 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (diamonds); 200/150 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (triangles); and 200/50 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (circles).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Steady-state ritonavir plasma concentrations illustrated as GMs and 90% CIs measured during the intake of the three different regimens: 400/100 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (diamonds); 200/150 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (triangles); and 200/50 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (circles).

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever