Recruitment cost and outcomes for an arthritis work disability prevention randomized clinical trial: The Work It study

Rawan AlHeresh, Molly W Vaughan, Inbar Hanouna Brenner, Julie Keysor, Rawan AlHeresh, Molly W Vaughan, Inbar Hanouna Brenner, Julie Keysor

Abstract

Background: Despite the recommendations to increase recruitment of participants into clinical trials, investigators face costly challenges in trials investigating work disability interventions for people with arthritis and rheumatological conditions. This study aims to evaluate the recruitment costs and outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of an arthritis work disability prevention program conducted between 2011 and 2015, to inform planning and monitoring recruitment in similar studies.

Methods: Data were obtained from enrollment and financial records pertaining to recruitment costs for each recruitment approach employed. The cost for each recruitment method was calculated for total cost and cost per number of participants screened, eligible, and enrolled in the trial. Then the yield of each possible recruitment method was also determined based on the ratio of the number of randomized participants divided by the number of people contacted through each recruitment method. Finally, the.

Results: Recruitment rate was lower than projected. Community advertising, specifically newspapers, was the most successful method of recruitment in terms of numbers, but social media, specifically Craigslist, was the least costly method used to recruit. Some social media approaches, including Facebook and LinkedIn, yielded few if any participants. Recruitment efforts used successfully in the past are not always effective.

Conclusions: Costs to recruit large numbers of people with arthritis into clinical trials are high. Investigators are encouraged to monitor recruitment efforts and evaluate the costs and outcomes of their strategies throughout the study period. Close consideration to recruitment costs should be considered as part of the research fiscal resources prior to and during the study period for long-term outcomes like work disability.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01387100, date: 06/01/2011.

Keywords: Randomized controlled trials; Recruitment; Rheumatology; Work disability.

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the “Work It” recruitment procedures.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proposed and Actual Recruitment Timelines for the “Work It” sized Controlled Trial.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Participants per recruitment method.

References

    1. Portney L.G., Watkins M.P. In: Philadelphia. third ed. Davis F.A., editor. 2015. Foundations of clinical research applications to practice.
    1. Kasenda B., von Elm E.B., You J., Blümle A., Tomonaga Y., Saccilotto R., Amstutz A., Bengough T., Meerpohl J., Stegert M., Tikkinen K.A.O., Neumann I., Carrasco-Labra A., Faulhaber M., Mulla S., Mertz D., Akl E.A., Bassler D., Busse J.W., Ferreira-González I., Lamontagne F., Nordmann A., Rosenthal R., Schandelmaier S., Sun X., Vandvik P.O., Johnston B.C., Walter M.A., Burnand B., Schwenkglenks M., Bucher H.C., Guyatt G.H., Briel M. Learning from failure - rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study) BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2012;12:131.
    1. Toerien M., Brookes S.T., Metcalfe C., de Salis I., Tomlin Z., Peters T.J., Sterne J., Donovan J.L. A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials. 2009;10:52.
    1. McDonald A.M., Knight R.C., Campbell M.K., Entwistle V.A., Grant A.M., Cook J.A., Elbourne D.R., Francis D., Garcia J., Roberts I., Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9.
    1. Foy R., Parry J., Duggan A., Delaney B., Wilson S., Lewin-Van Den Broek N.T., Lassen A., Vickers L., Myres P. How evidence-based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam. Pract. 2003;20:83.
    1. Puffer S., Torgerson D.J. Recruitment Difficulties in randomised controlled trials. Contr. Clin. Trials. 2003;24:214S.
    1. Sully B.G., Julious S.A., Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14:166.
    1. McDonald A.M., Treweek S., Shakur H., Free C., Knight R., Speed C., Campbell M.K. Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials. Trials. 2011;12:74.
    1. Treweek S., Lockhart P., Pitkethly M., Cook J.A., Kjeldstrøm M., Johansen M., Taskila T.K., Sullivan F.M., Wilson S., Jackson C., Jones R., Mitchell E.D. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3
    1. Caldwell P.H.Y., Hamilton S., Tan A., Craig J.C. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7
    1. Fletcher B., Gheorghe A., Moore D., Wilson S., Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2
    1. Stein M.A., Shaffer M., Echo-Hawk A., Smith J., Stapleton A., Melvin A. Research start: a multimethod study of barriers and accelerators of recruiting research participants. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2015;8:647.
    1. Burton W., Morrison A., Maclean R., Ruderman E. Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis. Occup. Med.-Oxf. 2006;56:18.
    1. Dhanhani A.M.A., Gignac M.A.M., Su J., Fortin P.R. Work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2009;61:378.
    1. Ariza-Ariza R., Hernández-Cruz B., Collantes E., Batlle E., Fernández-Sueiro J.L., Gratacós J., Juanola X., Linares L.F., Mulero J., Zarco P. Work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J. Rheumatol. 2009;36:2512.
    1. Martikainen J.A., Kautiainen H., Rantalaiho V., Puolakka K.T. Longterm work productivity costs due to absenteeism and permanent work disability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide register study of 7831 patients. J. Rheumatol. 2016;43:2101.
    1. Kakumanu S., Manns B.J., Tran S., Saunders-Smith T., Hemmelgarn B.R., Tonelli M., Tsuyuki R., Ivers N., Southern D., Bakal J., Campbell D.J.T. Cost analysis and efficacy of recruitment strategies used in a large pragmatic community-based clinical trial targeting low-income seniors: a comparative descriptive analysis. Trials. 2019;20:577.
    1. Keysor J.J., LaValley M.P., Brown C., Felson D.T., AlHeresh R.A., Vaughan M.W., Yood R., Reed J.I., Allaire S.J. Efficacy of a work disability prevention program for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: the work it study trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;70(7):1022–1029.
    1. Keysor J.J., AlHeresh R., Vaughan M., LaValley M.P., Allaire S. The work-it study for people with arthritis: study protocol and baseline sample characteristics. Work. 2016;54:473.
    1. Allaire S., Keysor J.J. Development of a structured interview tool to help patients identify and solve rheumatic condition-related work barriers. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:988.
    1. Allaire S.H., Niu Jingbo, LaValley M.P. Employment and satisfaction outcomes from a job retention intervention delivered to persons with chronic diseases. Rehabil. Counsel. Bull. 2005;48:100.
    1. Marsh A.P., Lovato L.C., Glynn N.W., Kennedy K., Castro C., Domanchuk K., McDavitt E., Rodate R., Marsiske M., McGloin J., Groessl E.J., Pahor M., Guralnik J.M. Lifestyle interventions and independence for elders study: recruitment and baseline characteristics. J. Gerontol. Ser. A. 2013;68:1549.
    1. Sanders K.M., Stuart A.L., Merriman E.N., Read M.L., Kotowicz M.A., Young D., Taylor R., Blair-Holt I., Mander A.G., Nicholson G.C. Trials and tribulations of recruiting 2,000 older women onto a clinical trial investigating falls and fractures: vital D study. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2009;9:78.
    1. Adams M., Caffrey L., McKevitt C. Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre. Health Res. Pol. Syst. 2015;13:8.
    1. Campbell M.K., Snowdon C., Francis D., Elbourne D., McDonald A.M., Knight R., Entwistle V., Garcia J., Roberts I., Grant A., Grant A. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol. Assess. Winch. Engl. 2007;11:iii. STEPS group.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever