Pharmacokinetic Properties of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Administered in Different Subcutaneous Injection Regions

Ulrike Hövelmann, Tim Heise, Leszek Nosek, Bettina Sassenfeld, Karen Margrete Due Thomsen, Hanne Haahr, Ulrike Hövelmann, Tim Heise, Leszek Nosek, Bettina Sassenfeld, Karen Margrete Due Thomsen, Hanne Haahr

Abstract

Background: Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart set in a new formulation with faster initial absorption after subcutaneous administration. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic properties, including the absolute bioavailability, of faster aspart when administered subcutaneously in the abdomen, upper arm or thigh.

Methods: In a randomised, open-label, crossover trial, 21 healthy male subjects received a single injection of faster aspart at five dosing visits: 0.2 U/kg subcutaneously in the abdomen, upper arm and thigh, intramuscularly in the thigh and 0.02 U/kg intravenously. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetics was performed pre-dose and frequently thereafter until 12 h post-dose (8 h after intravenous administration).

Results: Onset of appearance (~3 min), time to 50% of maximum concentration (t Early 50% Cmax; ~20 min) and time to maximum concentration (t max; ~55 min) were all similar between injection regions. Early exposure within the first 2 h after injection (AUCIAsp,0-1h and AUCIAsp,0-2h) as well as maximum concentration (C max) were comparable for the abdomen and upper arm, but were ~25% lower for the thigh as seen previously for other mealtime insulin products. Total exposure (AUCIAsp,0-t) was similar for the abdomen, upper arm and thigh, and absolute bioavailability was ~80% after subcutaneous administration of faster aspart in all three injection regions.

Conclusion: The current study supports the ultra-fast pharmacokinetic characteristics of faster aspart across different injection regions, with administration in the abdomen and upper arm resulting in greater early exposure than in the thigh. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02089451.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

This study was funded by Novo Nordisk.

Conflict of interest

Tim Heise is a shareholder in Profil, which received research funds from Adocia, AstraZeneca, Becton Dickinson, Biocon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dance Biopharm, Eli Lilly, Grünenthal, Gulf Pharmaceutical Industries, Johnson & Johnson, Marvel, MedImmune, Medtronic, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Senseonics and Zealand Pharma. In addition, Tim Heise is a member of advisory panels for Novo Nordisk and received speaker honoraria and travel grants from Eli Lilly, Mylan and Novo Nordisk. Karen Margrete Due Thomsen and Hanne Haahr are employees and shareholders of Novo Nordisk. Ulrike Hövelmann, Leszek Nosek and Bettina Sassenfeld declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design and subject disposition. Each subject participated in a total of five dosing visits in randomised sequence. All dosing visits were separated by a washout period of 3–12 days. The three randomised subjects who did not complete the trial were all due to withdrawal of consent (one before first dosing, one after subcutaneous administration in the thigh and one after intravenous administration and subcutaneous administration in the abdomen and upper arm). I.m. intramuscularly, i.v. intravenously, N number of subjects, s.c. subcutaneously
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean observed serum insulin aspart concentration-time profiles for 0.2 U/kg faster aspart administered subcutaneously in the abdomen, upper arm or thigh

References

    1. De Coninck C, Frid A, Gaspar R, et al. Results and analysis of the 2008–2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey. J Diabetes. 2010;2:168–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2010.00077.x.
    1. Frid AH, Kreugel G, Grassi G, et al. New insulin delivery recommendations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1231–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.010.
    1. Berger M, Cüppers HJ, Hegner H, Jörgens V, Berchtold P. Absorption kinetics and biologic effects of subcutaneously injected insulin preparations. Diabetes Care. 1982;5:77–91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.5.2.77.
    1. Bantle JP, Neal L, Frankamp LM. Effects of the anatomical region used for insulin injections on glycemia in type I diabetes subjects. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:1592–1597. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.12.1592.
    1. ter Braak EW, Woodworth JR, Bianchi R, et al. Injection site effects on the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of insulin lispro and regular insulin. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1437–1440. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.12.1437.
    1. Mudaliar SR, Lindberg FA, Joyce M, et al. Insulin aspart (B28 asp-insulin): a fast-acting analog of human insulin: absorption kinetics and action profile compared with regular human insulin in healthy nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1501–1506. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1501.
    1. Apidra (insulin glulisine). CHMP Assessment Report. Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/557/X/0023. 12 January 2010. Available from: . Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
    1. Heise T, Hövelmann U, Brøndsted L, Adrian CL, Nosek L, Haahr H. Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:682–688. doi: 10.1111/dom.12468.
    1. Heise T, Stender-Petersen K, Hövelmann U, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of faster-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clinical Pharmacokinet. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0473-5.
    1. Heise T, Pieber TR, Danne T, Erichsen L, Haahr H. A pooled analysis of clinical pharmacology trials investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fast-acting insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes. Clinical Pharmacokinet. 2017. doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence. CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev. 1/Corr. 20 January 2010. Available from: . Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR Part 320. Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Requirements. Available from: . Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation. EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009 Rev. 1 Corr. 2. 21 July 2011. Available from: . Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Center for Veterinary Medicine. Guidance for Industry. Bioanalytical Method Validation. May 2001. Available from: . Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
    1. American Diabetes Association Defining and reporting hypoglycaemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycaemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1245–1249. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1245.
    1. Vora JP, Burch A, Peters JR, Owens DR. Relationship between absorption of radiolabeled soluble insulin, subcutaneous blood flow, and anthropometry. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:1484–1493. doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.11.1484.
    1. Jain L, Parks MH, Sahajwalla C. Determination of time to onset and rate of action of insulin products: importance and new approaches. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:271–279. doi: 10.1002/jps.23355.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever