Randomized control trial of computer-based rehabilitation of spatial neglect syndrome: the RESPONSE trial protocol

Thomas Van Vleet, Joseph DeGutis, Sawsan Dabit, Christopher Chiu, Thomas Van Vleet, Joseph DeGutis, Sawsan Dabit, Christopher Chiu

Abstract

Background: Spatial neglect is a frequent and debilitating consequence of acquired brain injury and currently has no widely accepted standard of care. While previous interventions for spatial neglect have targeted patients' overt spatial deficits (e.g., reduced contralesional visual scanning), far fewer have directly targeted patients' non-spatial deficits (e.g., sustained attention deficits). Considering that non-spatial deficits have shown to be highly predictive of long-term disability, we developed a novel computer based training program that targets both sustained (tonic) and moment-to-moment (phasic) aspects of non-spatial attention (Tonic and Phasic Alertness Training, TAPAT). Preliminary studies demonstrate that TAPAT is safe and effective in improving both spatial and non-spatial attention deficits in the post-acute recovery phase in neglect patients. The purpose of the current trial (referred to as the REmediation of SPatial Neglect or RESPONSE trial) is to compare TAPAT to an active control training condition, include a larger sample of patients, and assess both cognitive and functional outcomes.

Methods/design: We will employ a multi-site, longitudinal, blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) design with a target sample of 114 patients with spatial neglect. Patients will either perform, at their home, the experimental TAPAT training program or an active control computer games condition for thirty minutes/day, five days a week, over three months. Patients will be assessed on a battery of cognitive and functional outcomes on three occasions: a) immediately before training, b) within forty-eight hours post completion of total training, and c) after a three-month no-contact period post completion of total training, to assess the longevity of potential training effects.

Discussion: The strengths of this protocol are that it tests an innovative, in-home administered treatment that targets a fundamental deficit in neglect, employs highly sensitive computer-based assessments of cognition as well as functional outcomes, and incorporates a large sample size (relative to other neglect treatment studies) in an RCT design.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01965951.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study outline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spatial neglect screening protocol.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A visual, within-category version of TAPAT.

References

    1. Friedrich FJ. et al.Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology. 1998;12(2):193–207.
    1. Husain M, Kennard C. Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction. J Neurol. 1996;243(9):652–657. doi: 10.1007/BF00878662.
    1. Karnath HO, Ferber S, Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature. 2001;411(6840):950–953. doi: 10.1038/35082075.
    1. Karnath HO, Himmelbach M, Rorden C. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 2):350–360.
    1. Heilman KM. et al.Disorders of visual attention. Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1993;2(2):389–413.
    1. Mesulam MM. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol. 1990;28(5):597–613. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280502.
    1. Mort DJ. et al.The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 9):1986–1997.
    1. Posner MI. et al.Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984;4(7):1863–1874.
    1. Hier DB, Mondlock J, Caplan LR. Behavioral abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology. 1983;33(3):337–344. doi: 10.1212/WNL.33.3.337.
    1. Driver J, Vuilleumier P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition. 2001;79(1–2):39–88.
    1. Danckert J, Ferber S. Revisiting unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):987–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.004.
    1. Husain M. et al.Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature. 1997;385(6612):154–156. doi: 10.1038/385154a0.
    1. Robertson IH. et al.Auditory sustained attention is a marker of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35(12):1527–1532. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00084-5.
    1. Van Vleet TM, Robertson LC. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(8):1368–1379. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1368.
    1. Peers PV, Cusack R, Duncan J. Modulation of spatial bias in the dual task paradigm: evidence from patients with unilateral parietal lesions and controls. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1325–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.033.
    1. Duncan J. et al.Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999;128(4):450–478.
    1. Hjaltason H. et al.Sustained attention and awareness of disability in chronic neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34(12):1229–1233. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00044-9.
    1. Corbetta M. et al.Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1603–1610. doi: 10.1038/nn1574.
    1. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:569–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113731.
    1. Dodds CM. et al.The effects of time-on-task and concurrent cognitive load on normal visuospatial bias. Neuropsychology. 2008;22(4):545–552.
    1. Husain M, Rorden C. Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(1):26–36. doi: 10.1038/nrn1005.
    1. Weinberg J. et al.Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired right brain damage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1977;58(11):479.
    1. Barrett AM, Goedert KM, Basso JC. Prism adaptation for spatial neglect after stroke: translational practice gaps. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8(10):567–577. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.170.
    1. Pizzamiglio L. et al.Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect. Cortex. 1990;26(4):535–541. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80303-6.
    1. Ryan M. et al.Interstimulus jitter facilitates response control in children with ADHD. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(2):388–393. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709991305.
    1. Degutis JM, Van Vleet TM. Tonic and phasic alertness training: a novel behavioral therapy to improve spatial and non-spatial attention in patients with hemispatial neglect. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4
    1. Van Vleet TM, Degutis JM. Cross-training in hemispatial neglect: Auditory sustained attention training ameliorates visual attention deficits. Cortex; 2012.
    1. Bowen A. et al.Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD003586.
    1. List A. et al.Visual hemispatial neglect, re-assessed. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14(2):243–256.
    1. Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354(1387):1325–1346. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0482.
    1. Bonato M. et al.Increased attentional demands impair contralesional space awareness following stroke. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(13):3934–3940. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.022.
    1. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114(512):797–811. doi: 10.1192/bjp.114.512.797.
    1. Beck AT, Beamesderfer A. Assessment of depression: the depression inventory. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1974;7:151–169.
    1. Posner K. et al.The Columbia-suicide severity rating scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266–1277.
    1. Brott T. et al.Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864.
    1. Van Vleet TM, Robertson LC. Implicit representation and explicit detection of features in patients with hemispatial neglect. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 7):1889–1897.
    1. Mattingley JB. et al.The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):387–394. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.007.
    1. Malhotra P. et al.Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 2):424–435.
    1. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980;32(1):3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231.
    1. Royall DR. et al.Executive control mediates memory's association with change in instrumental activities of daily living: the freedom house study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(1):11–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53004.x.
    1. Miyake A. et al.The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1):49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
    1. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. (WAIS III) T.H.B.C. San Antonio, Editor; 1997.
    1. Delis DC. et al.Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan executive function system: an update. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10(2):301–303.
    1. Esterman M, In the Zone or Zoning Out? Tracking Behavioral and Neural Fluctuations During Sustained Attention. Cereb Cortex; 2012.
    1. Azouvi P. et al.Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(1):51–57. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50062.
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
    1. Chen P. et al.Functional assessment of spatial neglect: a review of the Catherine Bergego scale and an introduction of the Kessler foundation neglect assessment process. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(5):423–435. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-423.
    1. Gandek B. et al.Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. International quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–8. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7.
    1. Luaute J. et al.Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(7):961–982. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.03.001.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever