The Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus with Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Surgical Technique

John G Kennedy, Christopher D Murawski, John G Kennedy, Christopher D Murawski

Abstract

Objective: To present the functional results after autologous osteochondral transplantation with bone marrow aspirate concentrate in 72 patients, while placing an emphasis on the surgical technique.

Methods: Between 2005 and 2009, 72 patients underwent autologous osteochondral transplantation under the care of the senior author. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 34.19 years (range, 16-85 years). All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year after surgery. The mean follow-up time was 28.02 months (range, 12-64 months). Patient-reported outcome measures were taken preoperatively and at final follow-up using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) general health questionnaire. Identical questionnaires were used in all instances.

Results: The mean FAOS scores improved from 52.67 points preoperatively to 86.19 points postoperatively (range, 71-100 points). The mean SF-12 scores also improved from 59.40 points preoperatively to 88.63 points postoperatively (range, 52-98 points). Three patients reported donor site knee pain after surgery, and one patient required the decompression of a cyst that developed beneath the graft site approximately 2 years after the index procedure.

Conclusion: Autologous osteochondral transplantation is a reproducible and primary treatment strategy for large osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Keywords: ankle

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A provisional K-wire is drilled, exiting at the malleolar colliculus, to fluoroscopically visualize the medial malleolar osteotomy. A chevron-type cut is then made in the medial malleolus. Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Two parallel fixation holes are predrilled in the medial malleolus prior to making the osteotomy cut Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A modified retractor is utilized to allow adequate visualization and access to the medial aspect of the talus. Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) A lateral tibial trapezoidal osteotomy can be made to provide access to all but the most posterior lesions, thereby avoiding fibular takedown. (B) A single predrilled 4-mm titanium screw is used as final fixation for the osteotomy Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
A half-moon or figure-of-8 graft configuration is used to prevent that empty space that is evident when 2 cylindrical grafts are placed adjacent to one another Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Overdrilling and shaping the graft in a “bullet” fashion may prevent incongruency in the graft surface throughout the maturation process.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The lateral nonweightbearing aspect of the femoral condyle can be utilized for harvesting a donor plug Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
An ongoing biomechanical study at the authors’ institution to characterize the contact pressure alteration and restoration following the autologous osteochondral transplantation procedure demonstrates that relative to the intact ankle (A), creating an osteochondral lesion significantly alters contact pressure about the ankle joint such that the pressure is shifted centrally when loaded (B). Placement of the autologous osteochondral transplantation graft into the site of the defect (C) restores loading to intact levels.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
A mosquito snap is used to rotate the graft into the most congruent position possible Illustrations copyright of and reproduced with permission from JG Kennedy MD. Reproduction without express written consent is prohibited.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
The graft is tapped into final position only once perfect congruency is achieved.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Following graft placement, the osteotomy is fixated with titanium screws using the predrilled holes. The utilization of 2 medial malleolar screws at the osteotomy site has the potential to shift postoperatively (A). The current authors have modified this technique with a third transverse screw to prevent this potential shift in fixation (B).
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Coronal quantitative T2-mapping assessment of an osteochondral autograft transplanted into the medial aspect of the talar dome demonstrates restoration of the radius of curvature and color stratification similar to that of native cartilage.

References

    1. Saxena A, Eakin C. Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1680-7.
    1. Karlsson J, Sancone M. Management of acute ligament injuries of the ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(3):521-30.
    1. Kannus P, Renstrom P. Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(2):305-12.
    1. Lynch SA, Renström PA. Treatment of acute lateral ankle ligament rupture in the athlete conservative versus surgical treatment. Sports Med. 1999;27(1):61-71.
    1. Chuckpaiwong B, Berkson EM, Theodore GH. Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases. Arthroscopy. 2008;24: 106-12.
    1. Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW. Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1974-80.
    1. Guo QW, Hu YL, Jiao C, Yu CL, Ao YF. Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus: analysis of outcome predictors. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010;123(3):296-300.
    1. Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Tramatol Arthroscopy. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
    1. Hangody L, Vasarhelyi G, Hangody LR, Sukosd Z, Tibay G, Bartha L, et al. Autologous osteochondral grafting: technique and long-term results. Injury. 2008;39(Suppl 1):S32-9.
    1. Scranton PE, Frey CC, Feder KS. Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(5):614-9.
    1. Murawski CD, Foo LF, Kennedy JG. A review of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation techniques of the talus: the good, the bad, and the causes for concern. Cartilage. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
    1. Valderrabano V, Leumann A, Rasch H, Egelhof T, Hintermann D, Pagenstert G. Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(Suppl 1):105S-11S.
    1. Reddy S, Pedowitz DI, Parekh SG, Sennett BJ, Okereke E. The morbidity associated with osteochondral harvest from asymptomatic knees for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(1):80-5.
    1. Kevy SR, Jacobson MS, Mandle RJ. Defining the composition and healing effect of platelet-rich plasma. Transactions of the First International Symposium on the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Orthopaedics; August 5, 2010; New York, NY, USA.
    1. Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME, Raikin SM. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(2):154-61.
    1. Becher C, Thermann H. Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(8):583-9.
    1. Lee KB, Kai LB, Chung JY, Seon JK. Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Tramatol Arthrosc. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
    1. Schuman L, Strujis PA, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus: results at follow-up at 2 to 11 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(3):364-8.
    1. Van Buecken K, Barrack RL, Alexander AH, Ertl JP. Arthroscopic treatment of transchondral talar dome fractures. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(3):350-5, discussion 355-6.
    1. Gobbi A, Francisco RA, Lubowitz JH, Allegra F, Canata G. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, microfracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(10):1086-92.
    1. Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA, Sgaglione NA, Cheng MS, Applegate GR, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1750-62.
    1. Becher C, Driessen A, Hess T, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Thermann H. Microfracture for chondral defects of the talus: maintenance of early results at midterm follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):656-63.
    1. McNickle AG, L’Heureux DR, Yanke AB, Cole BJ. Outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation in a diverse patient population. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1344-50.
    1. Minas T, Gomoll AH, Rosenberger R, Royce RO, Bryant T. Increased failure rate of autologous chondrocyte implantation after previous treatment with marrow stimulation techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:902-8.
    1. Gomoll AH, Madry H, Knutsen G, van Dijk N, Seil R, Brittberg M, et al. The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(4):434-47.
    1. Garras DN, Santangelo JA, Wang DW, Easley ME. A quantitative comparison of surgical approaches for posterolateral osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(4):415-20.
    1. Kock NB, Van Susante JL, Buma P, Van Kampen A, Verdonschot N. Press-fit stability of an osteochondral autograft: influence of different plug length and perfect depth alignment. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(3):422-8.
    1. Gulotta LV, Rudzki JR, Kovacevic D, Chen CC, Milentijevic D, Williams RJ. Chondrocyte death and cartilage degradation after autologous osteochondral transplantation surgery in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(7):1324-33.
    1. Kang RW, Friel NA, Williams JM, Cole BJ, Wimmer MA. Effect of impaction sequence on osteochondral graft damage: the role of repeated and varying loads. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):105-13.
    1. Hangody L, Dobos J, Baló E, Pánics G, Hangody LR, Berkes I. Clinical experiences with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in an athletic population: a 17-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(6):1125-33.
    1. Hangody L, Rathonyi GK. Mosaicplasty in active sportsmen. Sportorthopadie Sporttraumatologie. 2004;20:159-64.
    1. LaPrade RF, Botker JC. Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autograft transfer procedures. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(7):e69-73.
    1. Paul J, Sagstetter A, Kriner M, Imhoff AB, Spang J, Hinterwimmer S. Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation for lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1683-8.
    1. Hangody L, Füles P. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 2:25-32.
    1. Navid DO, Myerson MS. Approach alternatives for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7:635-49.
    1. Ray RB, Coughlin EJ. Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. J Bone Jt Surg. 1947;29:697-710.
    1. Spatt JF, Frank NG, Fox IM. Transchondral fractures of the dome of the talus. J Foot Surg. 1986;25:68-72.
    1. Alexander IJ, Watson JT. Step-cut osteotomy of the medial malleolus for exposure of the medial ankle joint space. Foot Ankle. 1991;11:242-3.
    1. Bazaz R, Ferkel RD. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous chondrocyte implantation. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;3:45-52.
    1. Gaulrapp H, Hagena FW, Wasmer G. Die postoperative bewertung der osteochondrosis dissecans tali unter besonderer berücksichtigungder innenknöchelosteotomie. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1996;134:346-53.
    1. Jarde O, Trinquier-Lautard JL, Garate F, De LM, Vives P. Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: surgical treatment in a series of 30 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:608-15.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever