Evaluating real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using a test-negative case-control design

Matthew W Reynolds, Alex Secora, Alice Joules, Lisa Albert, Emma Brinkley, Tom Kwon, Christina Mack, Stephen Toovey, Nancy A Dreyer, Matthew W Reynolds, Alex Secora, Alice Joules, Lisa Albert, Emma Brinkley, Tom Kwon, Christina Mack, Stephen Toovey, Nancy A Dreyer

Abstract

Aim: It is important to assess if clinical trial efficacy translates into real-world effectiveness for COVID-19 vaccines. Materials & methods: We conducted a modified test-negative design (TND) to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of three COVID-19 vaccines. We defined cases in two ways: self-reported COVID-19-positive tests, and self-reported positive tests with ≥1 moderate/severe COVID-19 symptom. Results: Any vaccination was associated with a 95% reduction in subsequently reporting a positive COVID-19 test, and a 71% reduction in reporting a positive test and ≥1 moderate/severe symptom. Conclusion: We observed high effectiveness across all three marketed vaccines, both for self-reported positive COVID-19 tests and moderate/severe COVID-19 symptoms. This innovative TND approach can be implemented in future COVID-19 vaccine and treatment real-world effectiveness studies. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04368065.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; patient-reported outcomes; person-generated health data; symptoms; test-negative design; vaccines.

Figures

Figure 1.. Vaccination status determination at time…
Figure 1.. Vaccination status determination at time of COVID-19 testing for single-dose and two-dose vaccines.
Figure 2.. Vaccine effectiveness of preventing cases…
Figure 2.. Vaccine effectiveness of preventing cases of COVID-19 among those with at least one vaccination versus unvaccinated, overall and by manufacturer (primary analysis based on COVID-19 test results).
Figure 3.. Vaccine effectiveness of preventing cases…
Figure 3.. Vaccine effectiveness of preventing cases of COVID-19 among those with at least one vaccination versus unvaccinated, overall and by manufacturer (secondary analysis based on test results and requiring at least one moderate to severe symptom).

References

    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384(5), 403–416 (2021).
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(27), 2603–2615 (2020).
    1. Sadoff J, Gray G, Vandebosch A et al. Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384(23), 2187–2201 (2021).
    1. Patel MM, Jackson ML, Ferdinands J. Postlicensure evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines. JAMA 324(19), 1939–1940 (2020).
    2. • Peer-reviewed publication of post-licensure evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines using test-negative design. Findings show that “the test-negative design is popular because it offers 2 advantages: simplified logistics, because controls are already identified when identifying cases, and reduced confounding due to similar health care use patterns between cases and controls, similar to a nested case–control study”.

    1. Chua H, Feng S, Lewnard JA et al. The use of test-negative controls to monitor vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review of methodology. Epidemiology 31(1), 43–64 (2020).
    2. • Peer-reviewed publication of methodology of using test-negative design. Findings show that “The test-negative design has been increasingly used as an efficient study design to estimate vaccine effectiveness for a range of vaccines and pathogens”.

    1. Dean NE, Hogan JW, Schnitzer ME. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and the test-negative design. N. Engl. J. Med. 385(15), 1431–1433 (2021).
    2. • Peer-reviewed publication of methodology of using test-negative design for COVID-19 vaccines. Findings show that “Owing to their applicability to large electronic health records and their logistic simplicity relative to large prospective cohorts, test-negative designs can be expected to play an important role in monitoring the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States and elsewhere”.

    1. World Health Organization. Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: interim guidance (2021).
    1. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) hospitalisations associated with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2: an evaluation using the test-negative design: guidance document (2021).
    1. Feng S, Cowling BJ, Kelly H, Sullivan SG. Estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness with the test-negative design using alternative control groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 187(2), 389–397 (2018).
    1. Fukushima W, Hirota Y. Basic principles of test-negative design in evaluating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 35(36), 4796–4800 (2017).
    1. Shi M, An Q, Ainslie KEC, Haber M, Orenstein WA. A comparison of the test-negative and the traditional case–control study designs for estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness under nonrandom vaccination. BMC Infect. Dis. 17(1), 757 (2017).
    1. Vasileiou E, Sheikh A, Butler CC et al. Seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness in people with asthma: a national test-negative design case–control study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71(7), e94–e104 (2020).
    1. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on COVID-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case–control study. BMJ 373, n1088 (2021).
    1. Chung H, He S, Nasreen S et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada: test negative design study. BMJ 374, n1943 (2021).
    2. • Peer-reviewed publication of effectiveness of two COVID-19 vaccines studied in this publication. Findings show that “Two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were observed to be highly effective against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes. Vaccine effectiveness of one dose was observed to be lower, particularly for older adults shortly after the first dose”.

    1. Thompson MG, Stenehjem E, Grannis S et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in ambulatory and inpatient care settings. N. Engl. J. Med. 385(15), 1355–1371 (2021).
    1. Pilishvili T, Fleming-Dutra KE, Farrar JL et al. Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines among health care personnel – 33 US sites, January–March 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 70(20), 753–758 (2021).
    1. Fowlkes A, Gaglani M, Groover K et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline workers before and during B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant predominance – eight US locations, December 2020–August 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 70(34), 1167–1169 (2021).
    1. Kow CS, Hasan SS. Real-world effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: a meta-analysis of large observational studies. Inflammopharmacology 29(4), 1075–1090 (2021).
    1. Swift MD, Breeher LE, Tande AJ et al. Effectiveness of messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a cohort of healthcare personnel. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73(6), e1376–e1379 (2021).
    1. Britton A, Jacobs Slifka KM, Edens C et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine among residents of two skilled nursing facilities experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks – Connecticut, December 2020–February 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 70(11), 396–401 (2021).
    1. Tenforde MW, Olson SM, Self WH et al. Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines against COVID-19 among hospitalized adults aged >/= 65 years – United States, January–March 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 70(18), 674–679 (2021).
    1. Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL et al. Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers – eight US locations, December 2020–March 2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 70(13), 495–500 (2021).
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. COVID-19 vaccines (2022).
    1. Dreyer NA, Reynolds M, DeFilippo Mack C et al. Self-reported symptoms from exposure to COVID-19 provide support to clinical diagnosis, triage and prognosis: an exploratory analysis. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 38, 101909 (2020).
    2. •• Peer-review publication of the COVID-19 Active Research Experience utilizing the same patient registry in this study. Findings show that “this methodology is useful in capturing relevant real world data, particularly symptom severity, without requiring physical presentation for clinical assessment, and offers valuable perspective on the true burden of illness as well as signaling those at particularly high risk of severe symptoms and, in parallel, those unlikely to be at such increased risk”.

    1. Dreyer N, Petruski-Ivleva N, Albert L et al. Identification of a vulnerable group for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC): people with autoimmune diseases recover more slowly from COVID-19. Int. J. Gen. Med. 14, 3941–3949 (2021).
    1. Dreyer NA, Reynolds MW, Albert L et al. How frequent are acute reactions to COVID-19 vaccination and who is at risk? Vaccine 40(12), 1904–1912 (2022).
    2. •• Peer-reviewed publication of the COVID-19 Active Research Experience utilizing the same patient registry in this study. Findings show that “the total side effect burden was, not unexpectedly, greater with two-dose regimens but all three vaccines appear relatively safe. Very few subjects reported side effects serious enough to warrant medical care or reported post-vaccination hospitalization”.

    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. Assessing COVID-19-related symptoms in outpatient adult and adolescent subjects in clinical trials of drugs and biological products for COVID-19 prevention or treatment. (2020).
    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States (2021).
    1. Patel MK, Bergeri I, Bresee JS et al. Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization. Vaccine 39(30), 4013–4024 (2021).
    1. Roy NBA, Telfer P, Eleftheriou P et al. Protecting vulnerable patients with inherited anaemias from unnecessary death during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br. J. Haematol. 189(4), 635–639 (2020).
    1. Tremblay D, Rapp JL, Alpert N et al. Mild anemia as a single independent predictor of mortality in patients with COVID-19. EJHaem. 2(3), 319–326 (2021).

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever