Autogenous Bone and Bioactive Glass around Implants Placed Simultaneously with Ridge Splitting for the Treatment of Horizontal Bony Defects: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Walid Elamrousy, Mohamed Osama, Dalia Rasheed Issa, Walid Elamrousy, Mohamed Osama, Dalia Rasheed Issa

Abstract

Objective: To compare using autogenous bone with or without bioactive glass in ridge splitting of horizontal bone defects combined with simultaneous implant placement.

Materials and methods: In control group, bone expansion was performed and autogenous bone was used to augment the intercortical bone defect. In study group, autogenous bone was mixed with bioactive glass (1 : 1 in volume). In both groups, the implants were inserted simultaneously with ridge splitting. Six months following implant insertion, bone width and height were evaluated. Statistical analysis utilizing paired Student's t-test was used for comparing results within the same group, whereas independent samples t-test was used for intergroup variables comparison.

Results: The mean bone width and labial and mesiodistal crestal bone height values were increased significantly in both groups from baseline to 6 months postoperatively. Comparing the two groups showed nonstatistical significant difference regarding the labial crestal bone loss, while the ridge width gain values were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. The mesiodistal bone loss was significantly higher in control group than in study group.

Conclusion: Autogenous bone was mixed with bioactive glass (1 : 1 in volume) to fill intercortical defect created after ridge splitting to decrease peri-implant bone resorption associated with autogenous bone alone. This trial is registered with clinical trial registration: NCT04814160.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Walid Elamrousy et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for the participants in the current study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative CBCT.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preoperative view.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Expansion of osteomised ridge using bone wedges.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The harvested autogenous bone using trephine bur.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The 1 : 1 mix of bioactive glass and autogenous bone around dental implants.

References

    1. Elamrousy W., Nassar M., Ragheb A., Alnomany F., Marzok M. Radiographic bone changes around immediately placed immediately restored dental implants in periodontally compromised sites. Dentistry. 2012;3(2):p. 161. doi: 10.4172/2161-1122.1000161.
    1. Elamrousy W., Nassar M., Alnomany F., Ragheb A., Marzouk M. Radiographic bone changes around immediately placed immediate restored dental implants in periodontally compromised sites treated with Duo-Teck membrane. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2014;1(2):85–96.
    1. Tatum O. The omni implant system. Clarke’s Clinical Dentistry. 1984;5:126–127.
    1. Simion M., Baldoni M., Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1992;12(6):462–473.
    1. Scipioni A., Bruschi G. B., Calesini G. The edentulous ridge expansion technique: a five-year study. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1994;14(5):451–459.
    1. Precheur H. V. Bone graft materials. Dental Clinics of North America. 2007;51(3):729–746. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.004.
    1. Yadav V. S., Narula S. C., Sharma R. K., Tewari S., Yadav R. Clinical evaluation of guided tissue regeneration combined with autogenous bone or autogenous bone mixed with bioactive glass in intrabony defects. Journal of Oral Science. 2011;53(4):481–488. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.53.481.
    1. Zhang L., Huang Y. Radiographic evaluation of the alveolar ridge splitting technique combined with guided bone regeneration vs guided bone regeneration alone in the anterior maxilla: a retrospective controlled study. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2020 doi: 10.11607/prd.4512.
    1. Chiapasco M., Zaniboni M., Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2006;17(S2):136–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01357.x.
    1. Moro A., Gasparini G., Foresta E., et al. Alveolar ridge split technique using piezosurgery with specially designed tips. BioMed Research International. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/4530378.4530378
    1. Coatoam G. W., Mariotti A. The segmental ridge-split procedure. Journal of Periodontology. 2003;74(5):757–770. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.757.
    1. Mercan U., Erdogan O. Comparison of the use of piezosurgery expander and conventional instruments on primary implant stability. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2020;23(11):1517–1522. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_132_20.
    1. Chauhan H., Lakshmi S., Aurora J. K., Potlia I., Komal A., Purohit N. Comparison between immediate vs. delayed lateral expansion technique to augment narrow alveolar ridges for placement of implants—a pilot study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020;10(2):78–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.02.007.
    1. De Souza C. S. V., De Sá B. C. M., Goulart D., Guillen G. A., Macêdo F. G. C., Nóia C. F. Split crest technique with immediate implant to treat horizontal defects of the alveolar ridge: analysis of increased thickness and implant survival. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2020;19(4):498–505. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01332-z.
    1. Anitua E., Begoña L., Orive G. Clinical evaluation of split-crest technique with ultrasonic bone surgery for narrow ridge expansion: status of soft and hard tissues and implant success. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2013;15(2):176–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00340.x.
    1. Crespi R., Capparè P., Gherlone E. F. Electrical mallet provides essential advantages in split-crest and immediate implant placement. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;18(1):59–64. doi: 10.1007/s10006-013-0389-2.
    1. Ehab A., Hanan S. Management of severely resorbed ridge using ridge splitting techniques with simultaneous implantation. Cairo Dental Journal. 2009;25:97–103.
    1. Kumar I., Singh H., Arora S. S., Singh A., Kumar N. Implant placement in conjunction with ridge split and expansion technique. Oral Surgery. 2019;12(3):214–223. doi: 10.1111/ors.12414.
    1. Rocchietta I., Simion M., Hoffmann M., Trisciuoglio D., Benigni M., Dahlin C. Vertical bone augmentation with an autogenous block or particles in combination with guided bone regeneration: a clinical and histological preliminary study in humans. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2016;18(1):19–29. doi: 10.1111/cid.12267.
    1. Rickert D., Vissink A., Slot W. J., Sauerbier S., Meijer H. J. A., Raghoebar G. M. Maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery with BioOss mixed with a bone marrow concentrate or autogenous bone: test of principle on implant survival and clinical performance. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;43(2):243–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.006.
    1. Menezes J. D., Pereira R. D. S., Bonardi J. P., Griza G. L., Okamoto R., Hochuli-Vieira E. Bioactive glass added to autogenous bone graft in maxillary sinus augmentation: a prospective histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and bone graft resorption assessment. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2018;26 doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0296.e20170296
    1. Souza E. Q. M., Costa Klaus A. E., Espósito Santos B. F., et al. Evaluations of hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass in the repair of critical size bone defects in rat calvaria. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020;10(4):422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.014.
    1. Pereira R. D. S., Menezes J. D., Bonardi J. P., Griza G. L., Okamoto R., Hochuli-Vieira E. Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical assessment of RUNX2 and VEGF of Biogran and autogenous bone graft in human maxillary sinus bone augmentation: a prospective and randomized study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2017;19(5):867–875. doi: 10.1111/cid.12507.
    1. Garcez-Filho J., Tolentino L., Sukekava F., Seabra M., Cesar-Neto J. B., Araújo M. G. Long-term outcomes from implants installed by using split-crest technique in posterior maxillae: 10 years of follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015;26(3):326–331. doi: 10.1111/clr.12330.
    1. Blus C., Szmukler-Moncler S., Vozza I., Rispoli L., Polastri C. Split-crest and immediate implant placement with ultrasonic bone surgery (piezosurgery): 3-year follow-up of 180 treated implant sites. Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany: 1985) 2010;41(6):463–469.
    1. Annibali S., Bignozzi I., Sammartino G., La Monaca G., Cristalli M. P. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation in localized alveolar deficient sites. Implant Dentistry. 2012;21(3):175–185. doi: 10.1097/id.0b013e31824ee3e9.
    1. Santagata M., Guariniello L., Tartaro G. Modified edentulous ridge expansion technique and immediate implant placement: a 3-year follow-up. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2015;41(2):184–187. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00308.
    1. Albanese M., Ricciardi G., Luciano U., et al. Alveolar splitting with Piezosurgery®, bone bank grafts and nobel active implants as an alternative to major bone grafting for maxillary reconstruction. Minerva Stomatologica. 2019;68(1):3–10. doi: 10.23736/s0026-4970.17.04006-7.
    1. Waechter J., Leite F. R., Nascimento G. G., Carmo Filho L. C., Faot F. The split crest technique and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017;46(1):116–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.017.
    1. Bassetti M. A., Bassetti R. G., Bosshardt D. D. The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2016;27(3):310–324. doi: 10.1111/clr.12537.
    1. Mounir M., Beheiri G., El-Beialy W. Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;43(11):1373–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.021.
    1. Tang Y.-L., Yuan J., Song Y.-L., Ma W., Chao X., Li D.-H. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015;26(2):204–211. doi: 10.1111/clr.12317.
    1. Bassetti R., Bassetti M., Mericske-Stern R., Enkling N. Piezoelectric alveolar ridge-splitting technique with simultaneous implant placement: a cohort study with 2-year radiographic results. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2013;28(6):1570–1580. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3174.
    1. Cosso M. G., De Brito R. B., Piattelli A., Shibli J. A., Zenóbio E. G. Volumetric dimensional changes of autogenous bone and the mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone graft in humans maxillary sinus augmentation. A multislice tomographic study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2014;25(11):1251–1256. doi: 10.1111/clr.12261.
    1. Pereira R. S., Menezes J. D., Bonardi J. P., Griza G. L., Okamoto R., Hochuli-Vieira E. Comparative study of volumetric changes and trabecular microarchitecture in human maxillary sinus bone augmentation with bioactive glass and autogenous bone graft: a prospective and randomized assessment. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018;47(5):665–671. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.016.
    1. Jensen O. T., Cullum D. R., Baer D. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants—a 1 year clinical study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67(9):1921–1930. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.017.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever