Gefitinib treatment in EGFR mutated caucasian NSCLC: circulating-free tumor DNA as a surrogate for determination of EGFR status

Jean-Yves Douillard, Gyula Ostoros, Manuel Cobo, Tudor Ciuleanu, Rebecca Cole, Gael McWalter, Jill Walker, Simon Dearden, Alan Webster, Tsveta Milenkova, Rose McCormack, Jean-Yves Douillard, Gyula Ostoros, Manuel Cobo, Tudor Ciuleanu, Rebecca Cole, Gael McWalter, Jill Walker, Simon Dearden, Alan Webster, Tsveta Milenkova, Rose McCormack

Abstract

Introduction: In the phase IV, open-label, single-arm study NCT01203917, first-line gefitinib 250 mg/d was effective and well tolerated in Caucasian patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (previously published). Here, we report EGFR mutation analyses of plasma-derived, circulating-free tumor DNA.

Methods: Mandatory tumor and duplicate plasma (1 and 2) baseline samples were collected (all screened patients; n = 1060). Preplanned, exploratory analyses included EGFR mutation (and subtype) status of tumor versus plasma and between plasma samples. Post hoc, exploratory analyses included efficacy by tumor and plasma EGFR mutation (and subtype) status.

Results: Available baseline tumor samples were 1033 of 1060 (118 positive of 859 mutation status known; mutation frequency, 13.7%). Available plasma 1 samples were 803 of 1060 (82 positive of 784 mutation status known; mutation frequency, 10.5%). Mutation status concordance between 652 matched tumor and plasma 1 samples was 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.3-96.0) (comparable for mutation subtypes); test sensitivity was 65.7% (95% CI, 55.8-74.7); and test specificity was 99.8% (95% CI, 99.0-100.0). Twelve patients of unknown tumor mutation status were subsequently identified as plasma mutation-positive. Available plasma 2 samples were 803 of 1060 (65 positive of 224 mutation status-evaluable and -known). Mutation status concordance between 224 matched duplicate plasma 1 and 2 samples was 96.9% (95% CI, 93.7-98.7). Objective response rates are as follows: mutation-positive tumor, 70% (95% CI, 60.5-77.7); mutation-positive tumor and plasma 1, 76.9% (95% CI, 65.4-85.5); and mutation-positive tumor and mutation-negative plasma 1, 59.5% (95% CI, 43.5-73.7). Median progression-free survival (months) was 9.7 (95% CI, 8.5-11.0; 61 events) for mutation-positive tumor and 10.2 (95% CI, 8.5-12.5; 36 events) for mutation-positive tumor and plasma 1.

Conclusion: The high concordance, specificity, and sensitivity demonstrate that EGFR mutation status can be accurately assessed using circulating-free tumor DNA. Although encouraging and suggesting that plasma is a suitable substitute for mutation analysis, tumor tissue should remain the preferred sample type when available.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00388206.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Dr. Douillard has received advisory board and symposia fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Sanofi-aventis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and has received a research grant from Merck Serono. Dr. Cole, Ms. McWalter, Dr. Walker, Mr. Dearden, Mr. Webster, Dr. Milenkova, and Dr. McCormack are employees of AstraZeneca and hold shares in AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Patient flow diagram. aAll screened patients. Used to calculate the correlation between clinical characteristics and tumor EGFR mutation status and the comparison of EGFR mutation status between tumor DNA and plasma-derived circulating-free tumor DNA. bOne patient of EGFR mutation-positive ineligible status was treated in error and included in the evaluable-for-safety population. A total of 107 patients therefore started study treatment. cFull analysis set population. Used to summarize efficacy data and for the comparison of EGFR mutation status in plasma and tumor samples. dNumber of patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors (n = 118) used as the denominator for the percentage calculation. eNumber of patients started on treatment (n = 107) used as the denominator for the percentage calculation. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor. Reproduced, in part, from Douillard et al.Br J Cancer 2014;110:55–62.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Tumor sample flow diagram. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Objective response rate according to EGFR mutation (and subtype) status for patients who were tumor EGFR mutation positive, tumor and plasma 1 EGFR mutation positive, and tumor EGFR mutation positive and plasma EGFR mutation negative. Reproduced, in part, from Douillard et al.Br J Cancer 2014;110:55–62.

References

    1. Vallières E, Peters S, Van Houtte P, Dalal P, Lim E. Therapeutic advances in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax. 2012;67:1097–1101.
    1. Li T, Kung HJ, Mack PC, Gandara DR. Genotyping and genomic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for current and future therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1039–1049.
    1. Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:823–859.
    1. Health and Social Care Information Centre NLCA. National Lung Cancer Audit Report 2012. Available at: . Accessed September 27, 2013.
    1. Goto K, Ichinose Y, Ohe Y, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in circulating free DNA in serum: from IPASS, a phase III study of gefitinib or carboplatin/paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:115–121.
    1. Goto K, Satouchi M, Ishii G, et al. An evaluation study of EGFR mutation tests utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer in the diagnostic setting. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2914–2919.
    1. Liu X, Lu Y, Zhu G, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of pleural effusion and plasma samples versus tumour tissue for detection of EGFR mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of methodologies. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:1065–1069.
    1. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, et al. Spanish Lung Cancer Group. Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:958–967.
    1. Yung TK, Chan KC, Mok TS, Tong J, To KF, Lo YM. Single-molecule detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in plasma by microfluidics digital PCR in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2076–2084.
    1. Aung KL, Board RE, Ellison G, et al. Current status and future potential of somatic mutation testing from circulating free DNA in patients with solid tumours. Hugo J. 2010;4:11–21.
    1. Board RE, Ellison G, Orr MC, et al. Detection of BRAF mutations in the tumour and serum of patients enrolled in the AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) advanced melanoma phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1724–1730.
    1. Board RE, Wardley AM, Dixon JM, et al. Detection of PIK3CA mutations in circulating free DNA in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:461–467.
    1. Hodgson DR, Wellings R, Orr MC, et al. Circulating tumour-derived predictive biomarkers in oncology. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15:98–101.
    1. Kimura H, Suminoe M, Kasahara K, et al. Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in serum DNA as a predictor of response to gefitinib (IRESSA). Br J Cancer. 2007;97:778–784.
    1. Liu Y, Liu B, Li XY, et al. A comparison of ARMS and direct sequencing for EGFR mutation analysis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment prediction in body fluid samples of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:111.
    1. Reck M, Hagiwara K, Tjulandin S, et al. Investigating the utility of plasma-derived circulating-free DNA for the detection of EGFR mutations in European and Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC: ASSESS study design. J Thorac Oncol. 2013:S483. 8(Supplement 2)
    1. Han B, Tjulandin S, Normanno N, et al. A diagnostic study to determine the prevalence of EGFR mutations in Asian and Russian patients with NSCLC of adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma histology: IGNITE study design. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(Supplement 2):S1098
    1. Douillard JY, Ostoros G, Cobo M, et al. First-line gefitinib in Caucasian EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients: a phase-IV, open-label, single-arm study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:55–62.
    1. Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2866–2874.
    1. Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T, et al. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1809–1818.
    1. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, et al. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2149–2158.
    1. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:947–957.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247.
    1. Greenwood M. 1926: The natural duration of cancer. Reports on public health and medical subjects. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Vol 33:1–26.
    1. Zhao X, Han RB, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation statuses in tissue and plasma in stage I-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients. Respiration. 2013;85:119–125.
    1. Salto-Tellez M, Tsao MS, Shih JY, et al. Clinical and testing protocols for the analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in East Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a combined clinical-molecular pathological approach. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:1663–1669.
    1. Shi Y, Au JS, Thongprasert S, et al. A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (PIONEER). J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:154–162.
    1. Oxnard GR, Paweletz CP, Kuang Y, et al. Noninvasive detection of response and resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer using quantitative next-generation genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1698–1705.
    1. Diaz LA, Jr, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:579–586.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever