Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study

Michelle A Kominiarek, Heidi Vyhmeister, Lauren C Balmert, Paige Fairchild, Hallie Tolo, William Grobman, Melissa Simon, Michelle A Kominiarek, Heidi Vyhmeister, Lauren C Balmert, Paige Fairchild, Hallie Tolo, William Grobman, Melissa Simon

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4-77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076-15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145-475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8-16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (p < 0.001 all comparisons). There were no differences in mean energy expenditure (MET-h/week) by PPAQ or ATD data at 28 weeks of gestation [231 (62-927 range) vs. 238 (212-290 range), p = 0.74] and at 36 weeks of gestation [145 (35-581 range) vs. 222 (196-272 range), p = 0.27]. Most women reported high satisfaction with an ATD in group prenatal care, yet adherence to the study protocol was low and ATD technical problems were common. As gestational age increased, activity decreased while sedentary time increased, suggesting that additional research is needed to find ways to engage women in physical activity during pregnancy.

Keywords: activity tracking devices; feasibility study; group prenatal care; physical activity; pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Active days of ATD use, defined as at least 1000 steps/day (red bars), as a proportion of total potential active days (blue bars) from date of enrollment to date of delivery for 38 participants who did not report permanent ATD or cell phone problems (e.g., lost or broken ATD or charger, loss of cell phone access). ATD, activity tracking device.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Mean (blue dots) and range (red bars) of (a) steps and (b) sedentary hours for 25 participants who wore the ATD consecutively for the first 7 days.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Mean (a) steps, (b) active minutes, and (c) sedentary hours plotted against gestational age for all 49 participants. Each dot represents the mean steps, active minutes, or sedentary hours for any participant who had ATD data during the corresponding gestational week. The blue line, or LOESS curve, is a nonparametric method for fitting a curve through points on a scatter plot, revealing trends in the data.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Longitudinal modeling for ATD data with predicted (a) logarithmic steps, (b) sedentary hours, and (c) active minutes as denoted by black lines with 95% CI (shaded area) plotted against gestational age with p < 0.001 for change over time for all comparisons.

References

    1. Guérin E, Ferraro ZM, Adamo KB, et al. . The need to objectively measure physical activity during pregnancy: considerations for clinical research and public health impact. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22:637–641
    1. Muktabhant B, Lawrie TA, Lumbiganon P, et al. . Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD007145
    1. Schuster S, Šklempe Kokić I, Sindik J. Measuring physical activity in pregnancy using questionnaires: a meta-analysis. Acta Clin Croat. 2016;55:440–452
    1. Sattler MC, Jaunig J, Watson ED, et al. . Physical activity questionnaires for pregnancy: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2018;48:2317–2346
    1. Evenson KR, Chasan-Taber L, Symons Downs D, et al. . Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:479–494
    1. da Silva SG, Ricardo LI, Evenson KR, et al. . Leisure-time physical activity in pregnancy and maternal-child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Sports Med. 2017;47:295–317
    1. Lim S, O'Reilly S, Behrens H, et al. . Effective strategies for weight loss in post-partum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16:972–987
    1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 731: group prenatal Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131;e104–e108
    1. Patil CL, Klima CS, Leshabari SC, et al. . Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:336.
    1. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. . Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:330–339
    1. Kominiarek MA, Crockett A, Covington-Kolb S, et al. . Association of group prenatal care with gestational weight gain. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:663–670
    1. Tanner-Smith EE, Steinka-Fry KT, Gesell SB. Comparative effectiveness of group and individual prenatal care on gestational weight gain. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:1711–1720
    1. Trudnak TE, Arboleda E, Kirby RS, et al. . Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58:396–403
    1. Magriples U, Boynton MH, Kershaw TS, et al. . The impact of group prenatal care on pregnancy and postpartum weight trajectories. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:688.e1–688.e9
    1. Walton RB, Shaffer S, Heaton J. Group prenatal care outcomes in a military population: a retrospective cohort study. Mil Med. 2015;180:825–829
    1. Zielinski R, Stork L, Deibel M, et al. . Improving infant and maternal health through CenteringPregnancy: a comparison of maternal health indicators and infant outcomes between women receiving group versus traditional prenatal care. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;4:497–505
    1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126;650:e135–e142
    1. Institute of Medicine. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2009
    1. Lindseth G, Vari P. Measuring physical activity during pregnancy. West J Nurs Res. 2005;27:722–734
    1. Downs DS, LeMasurier GC, DiNallo JM. Baby steps: pedometer-determined and self-reported leisure-time exercise behaviors of pregnant women. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:63–72
    1. Cohen TR, Plourde H, Koski KG. Use of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) to identify behaviours associated with appropriate gestational weight gain during pregnancy. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10:1000–1007
    1. Cadmus-Bertram LA, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, et al. . Randomized trial of a fitbit-based physical activity intervention for women. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:414–418
    1. Chasan-Taber L, Schmidt MD, Roberts DE, et al. . Development and validation of a pregnancy physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1750–1760
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381
    1. Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C, Cragg S, et al. . Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: the Canadian physical activity levels among youth study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:430–435
    1. Mutrie N, Doolin O, Fitzsimons CF, et al. . Increasing older adults' walking through primary care: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2012;29:633–642
    1. Sedentary Behavior Research Network. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:540–542
    1. Huberty JL, Buman MP, Leiferman JA, et al. . Trajectories of objectively-measured physical activity and sedentary time over the course of pregnancy in women self-identified as inactive. Prev Med Rep. 2016;3:353–360
    1. Macridis S, Johnston N, Johnson S, et al. . Consumer physical activity tracking device ownership and use among a population-based sample of adults. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0189298.
    1. Alley S, Schoeppe S, Guertler D, et al. . Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011243
    1. Endres LK, Straub H, McKinney C, et al. . Postpartum weight retention risk factors and relationship to obesity at 1 year. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:144–152
    1. Lemmens PMC, Sartor F, Cox LGE, et al. . Evaluation of an activity monitor for use in pregnancy to help reduce excessive gestational weight gain. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:312.
    1. Hesketh KR, Evenson KR, Stroo M, et al. . Physical activity and sedentary behavior during pregnancy and postpartum, measured using hip and wrist-worn accelerometers. Prev Med Rep. 2018;10:337–345
    1. Kooiman TJ, Dontje ML, Sprenger SR, et al. . Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:24.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever