Effectiveness of double tie-over dressing compared with bolster dressing
Seo Hyung Lee, Yu Jin Kim, Seo Hyung Lee, Yu Jin Kim
Abstract
Background: Skin grafting is a commonly performed operation in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The tie-over dressing is an effective technique to secure the grafted skin by delivering persistent downward pressure. However, if an additional dressing is required due to incomplete graft healing, the process of re-implementing the tie-over dressing may be frustrating for both patients and surgeons. Therefore, we introduce the double tie-over dressing, which readily allows for an additional tie-over dressing after the first dressing, and we present a comparison of its effectiveness with that of the simpler bolster dressing.
Methods: Of 128 patients with a skin defect, 69 received a double tie-over dressing and 59 patients received a simple bolster dressing. Using the independent t-test, the mean healing time, which was defined as the mean time it took for the wound to heal completely so that no additional dressing was required and it was washable with tap water, was compared between the 2 groups in both the head and neck region and in other areas.
Results: The mean healing time for the head and neck region in the double tie-over dressing group was 9.19±1.78 days, while it was 11.05±3.85 days in the bolster dressing group. The comparison of the 2 groups by the independent t-test revealed a P-value of 0.003 for the mean healing time.
Conclusions: In the head and neck area, the double tie-over dressing required less time to heal than the simple bolster dressing.
Keywords: Bandages; Dermatologic surgical procedures; Occlusive dressings; Skin transplantation; Wounds and injuries.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
![Fig. 1.. A traumatic skin defect on…](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5968322/bin/aps-2017-01424f1.jpg)
![Fig. 2.. A basal cell carcinoma on…](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5968322/bin/aps-2017-01424f2.jpg)
References
- Blair VP, Brown JB. The use and uses of large split skin grafts of intermediate thickness. Plast Reconst Surg. 1968;42:65–75.
- Joyce KM, Joyce CW, Mahon N, et al. Use of a barbed suture tie-over technique for skin graft dressings: a case series. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:341–5.
- Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H, Ono S. Useful tips for successful skin grafting. J Nippon Med Sch. 2007;74:386–92.
- Niranjan NS. A modified tie-over dressing for skin grafts. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38:415–8.
- Jo HJ, Kim JS, Kim NG, et al. Redoable tie-over dressing using multiple loop silk threads. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40:259–62.
- Ergen D, Tan O, Bayindir O. Tension suture technique for skin graft fixation: a novel alternative to tie-over dressing. Burns. 2006;32:778–9.
- Budi S, Rados J, Stanec Z. A sports jacket clip: a simple method of securing tie-over dressings. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:e495–6.
- Misra A, Belcher HJ. A new loop suture tie-over technique for skin graft dressings. J Hand Surg Br. 2002;27:129–33.
- Bektas CI, Kankaya Y, Ozer K, et al. A tie-over dressing using a silicone tube to graft deep wounds. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40:711–4.
- Seymour FK, Giele HP. Tie-overs under pressure. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:494–7.
- Joyce CW, Joyce KM, Mahon N, et al. A novel barbed suture tie-over dressing for skin grafts: a comparison with traditional techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1237–41.
- Joyce CW, Joyce KM, Kennedy AM, et al. The running barbed tie-over dressing. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2:e137.
Source: PubMed