Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Dynamics to Model Response to Antiviral Therapies

Silke Gastine, Juanita Pang, Florencia A T Boshier, Simon J Carter, Dagan O Lonsdale, Mario Cortina-Borja, Ivan F N Hung, Judy Breuer, Frank Kloprogge, Joseph F Standing, Silke Gastine, Juanita Pang, Florencia A T Boshier, Simon J Carter, Dagan O Lonsdale, Mario Cortina-Borja, Ivan F N Hung, Judy Breuer, Frank Kloprogge, Joseph F Standing

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral loads change rapidly following symptom onset, so to assess antivirals it is important to understand the natural history and patient factors influencing this. We undertook an individual patient-level meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in humans to describe viral dynamics and estimate the effects of antivirals used to date. This systematic review identified case reports, case series, and clinical trial data from publications between January 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) regression model of time to viral clearance was fitted to respiratory and stool samples. A simplified four parameter nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) model was fitted to viral load trajectories in all sampling sites and covariate modeling of respiratory viral dynamics was performed to quantify time-dependent drug effects. Patient-level data from 645 individuals (age 1 month to 100 years) with 6,316 viral loads were extracted. Model-based simulations of viral load trajectories in samples from the upper and lower respiratory tract, stool, blood, urine, ocular secretions, and breast milk were generated. Cox-PH modeling showed longer time to viral clearance in older patients, men, and those with more severe disease. Remdesivir was associated with faster viral clearance (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 9.19, P < 0.001), as well as interferon, particularly when combined with ribavirin (AHR = 2.2, P = 0.015; AHR = 6.04, P = 0.006). Combination therapy should be further investigated. A viral dynamic dataset and NLME model for designing and analyzing antiviral trials has been established.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no competing interests for this work. As an Associate Editor of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Joseph F. Standing was not involved in the review or decision process for this paper.

© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) diagram detailing the systematic search results.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model‐predicted viral load trajectories at each sample site studied. Black lines are the median predictions, with shaded areas representing the 95% prediction interval. The percentage of samples that are predicted to be below a typical limit of detection (10 copies/mL) are given in two‐daily time bins on each plot. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multivariable Cox proportional hazard results on all drug quality 1 and drug quality 2 data from respiratory and stool/rectal sampling sites. Adjusted hazard ratios exceeding 1 indicate virus being more likely to become undetectable. LOD, limit of detection.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Visual predictive checks for the nonlinear mixed‐effects model fitted to viral load data to each sampling site. For each site a plot of model simulations compared with observations is given for both the continuous data (upper) and the fraction of samples below the limit of detection (lower). Black circles are observed viral loads, purple shaded area is the 95% prediction interval of the simulated 2.5th and 97.5th percentile for comparison with the observed 2.5 and 97.5th percentile (dashed lines). The blue shaded area is the 95% prediction interval of the 50th percentile to compare with the continuous black line. In the lower plot, the observed proportion of samples below the lower limit of detection (LLOD) are shown as a black line and compared with the 95% prediction interval of the model predicted proportion of samples below the LLOD (green shaded area). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Simulated viral load trajectories. Simulations with a dummy population equally distributed between 50 and 100 years, and equal male/female ratio were performed for each scenario. Drugs were started at day 1 (blue), day 3 (orange), day 7 (green), or day 10 (red) post symptom onset. Mean black line and error bars represent simulations of the dummy population without drug treatment. Colored mean lines and error bars represent the respective drug regimen. Percentage values represent expected proportion of samples below the limit of detection for no drug (black) vs. drug therapy (colored) at each timepoint. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Arshad, U. et al. Prioritization of anti‐SARS‐Cov‐2 drug repurposing opportunities based on plasma and target site concentrations derived from their established human pharmacokinetics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 108, 775–790 (2020).
    1. To, K.K. et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS‐CoV‐2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 565–574 (2020).
    1. He, X. et al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID‐19. Nat. Med. 26, 672–675 (2020).
    1. Rajpal, A. , Rahimi, L. & Ismail‐Beigi, F. Factors leading to high morbidity and mortality of COVID‐19 in patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes 12, 895–908 (2020).
    1. Fishman, J.A. & Grossi, P.A. Novel Coronavirus‐19 (COVID‐19) in the immunocompromised transplant recipient: #Flatteningthecurve. Am. J. Transplant. 20, 1765–1767 (2020).
    1. Zheng, S. et al. Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in Zhejiang Province, China, January‐March 2020: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 369, m1443 (2020).
    1. Kamal, M.A. et al. A drug‐disease model describing the effect of oseltamivir neuraminidase inhibition on influenza virus progression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 5388–5395 (2015).
    1. Kim, J.Y. et al. Viral load kinetics of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in first two patients in Korea. J. Korean Med. Sci. 35, e86 (2020).
    1. Hung, I.F. et al. Triple combination of interferon beta‐1b, lopinavir‐ritonavir, and ribavirin in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID‐19: an open‐label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet 395, 1695–1704 (2020).
    1. Recovery trial . Statement from the chief investigators of the randomised evaluation of COVid‐19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial on lopinavir‐ritonavir. 2020 <>. Accessed June 29, 2020.
    1. Stewart, L.A. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA‐IPD Statement. JAMA 313, 1657–1665 (2015).
    1. Rohatgi, A. Webplotdigitizer: Version 4.2. 2019 [cited] <>.
    1. Vogels, C.B.F. et al. Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS‐COV‐2 qRT‐PCR primer‐probe sets. medRxiv 2020.2003.2030.20048108. (2020)
    1. Chu, D.K.W. et al. Molecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (2019‐nCoV) causing an outbreak of pneumonia. Clin. Chem. 66, 549–555 (2020).
    1. Grambsch, P.M. & Therneau, T.M. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81, 515–526 (1994).
    1. R Core Team . A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (version 3.6.3) (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019).
    1. Baccam, P. , Beauchemin, C. , Macken, C.A. , Hayden, F.G. & Perelson, A.S. Kinetics of influenza A virus infection in humans. J. Virol. 80, 7590–7599 (2006).
    1. Anguelova, M. , Karlsson, J. & Jirstrand, M. Minimal output sets for identifiability. Math. Biosci. 239, 139–153 (2012).
    1. Kim, K.S. et al. Modelling SARS‐CoV‐2 dynamics: implications for therapy. medRxiv 2020.2003.2023.20040493 (2020)
    1. Beal, S. , Sheiner, L.B. , Boeckmann, R. & Bauer, R.J. NONMEM 7.4 users guides. (1989‐2018) [cited] <>.
    1. Nguyen, T.H. et al. Model evaluation of continuous data pharmacometric models: metrics and graphics. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 6, 87–109 (2017).
    1. Beal, S.L. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 28, 481–504 (2001).
    1. Blanco‐Melo, D. et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS‐CoV‐2 drives development of COVID‐19. Cell 181, 1036–1045 e1039 (2020).
    1. Chu, H. et al. Comparative replication and immune activation profiles of SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV in human lungs: an ex vivo study with implications for the pathogenesis of COVID‐19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 1400–1409.(2020).
    1. Zeitlinger, M. et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antiviral agents used to treat SARS‐CoV‐2 and their potential interaction with drugs and other supportive measures: a comprehensive review by the PK/PD of Anti‐Infectives Study Group of the European Society of Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 59, 1195–1216 (2020).
    1. Sheahan, T.P. et al. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS‐CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 222 (2020).
    1. Arabi, Y.M. et al. Treatment of middle east respiratory syndrome with a combination of lopinavir‐ritonavir and interferon‐beta1b (MIRACLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 19, 81 (2018).
    1. Yuan, S. et al. Broad‐spectrum host‐based antivirals targeting the interferon and lipogenesis pathways as potential treatment options for the pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Viruses 12, 628 (2020).
    1. Pan, H. et al. Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID‐19 –interim WHO SOLIDARITY trial results. medRxiv 2020.2010.2015.20209817. (2020).
    1. Synairgen plc . Interim results for the six months ended 30 June 2020. 2020 <>.
    1. Recovery Collaborative Group . Lopinavir‐ritonavir in patients admitted to hospital with COVID‐19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open‐label, platform trial. Lancet 396, 1345–1352 (2020).
    1. Chu, C.M. et al. Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax 59, 252–256 (2004).
    1. Chan, K.S. et al. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med. J. 9, 399–406 (2003).
    1. Park, S.Y. et al. Post‐exposure prophylaxis for Middle East respiratory syndrome in healthcare workers. J. Hosp. Infect. 101, 42–46 (2019).
    1. Gautret, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID‐19: results of an open‐label non‐randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 56, 105949 (2020).
    1. Goncalves, A. et al. Timing of antiviral treatment initiation is critical to reduce SARS‐CoV‐2 viral load. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 9, 509–514 (2020).
    1. Wolfel, R. et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID‐2019. Nature 581, 465–469 (2020).
    1. Alexandersen, S. , Chamings, A. & Bhatta, T.R. SARS‐CoV‐2 genomic and subgenomic RNAs in diagnostic samples are not an indicator of active replication. medRxiv 2020.2006.2001.20119750 (2020).
    1. van Kampen, J.J.A. et al. Duration and key determinants of infectious virus shedding in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19). Nat. Commun. 12, 267 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-020-20568-4
    1. Laouenan, C. , Guedj, J. & Mentre, F. Clinical trial simulation to evaluate power to compare the antiviral effectiveness of two hepatitis C protease inhibitors using nonlinear mixed effect models: a viral kinetic approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 13, 60 (2013).
    1. Kam, K.Q. et al. A well infant with coronavirus disease 2019 with high viral load. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 847–849 (2020).
    1. Liu, Y. et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019‐nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci. China Life Sci. 63, 364–374 (2020).
    1. Lim, J. et al. Case of the index patient who caused tertiary transmission of COVID‐19 infection in Korea: the application of lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID‐19 infected pneumonia monitored by quantitative RT‐PCR. J. Korean Med. Sci. 35, e79 (2020).
    1. Pan, Y. , Zhang, D. , Yang, P. , Poon, L.L.M. & Wang, Q. Viral load of SARS‐CoV‐2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 411–412 (2020).
    1. Zhang, W. et al. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019‐nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 386–389 (2020).
    1. Xu, T. et al. Clinical features and dynamics of viral load in imported and non‐imported patients with COVID‐19. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94, 68–71 (2020).
    1. Chen, W. et al. Detectable 2019‐nCoV viral RNA in blood is a strong indicator for the further clinical severity. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 469–473 (2020).
    1. Young, B.E. et al. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in Singapore. JAMA 323, 1488–1494 (2020).
    1. Shen, C. et al. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID‐19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA 323, 1582–1589 (2020).
    1. Wan, R. , Mao, Z.Q. , He, L.Y. , Hu, Y.C. & Wei, C. Evidence from two cases of asymptomatic infection with SARS‐CoV‐2: are 14 days of isolation sufficient? Int. J. Infect. Dis. 95, 174–175 (2020).
    1. Lescure, F.X. et al. Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID‐19 in Europe: a case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 20, 697–706 (2020).
    1. Xu, Y. et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat. Med. 26, 502–505 (2020).
    1. Han, M.S. et al. Sequential analysis of viral load in a neonate and her mother infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 2236–2239 (2020).
    1. Wyllie, A.L. et al. Saliva is more sensitive for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection in COVID‐19 patients than nasopharyngeal swabs. medRxiv 2020.2004.2016.20067835 (2020)
    1. Cheng, C.Y. et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir did not shorten the duration of SARS CoV‐2 shedding in patients with mild pneumonia in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 53, 488–492 (2020).
    1. Yang, Y. et al. Evaluating the accuracy of different respiratory specimens in the laboratory diagnosis and monitoring the viral shedding of 2019‐nCoV infections. medRxiv 2020.2002.2011.20021493 (2020)
    1. Yang, J.R. et al. Persistent viral RNA positivity during the recovery period of a patient with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. J. Med. Virol. 92, 1681–1683 (2020).
    1. COVID Investigation Team . Clinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in the United States. Nat. Med. 26, 861–868 (2020).
    1. Lui, G. et al. Viral dynamics of SARS‐CoV‐2 across a spectrum of disease severity in COVID‐19. J. Infect. 81, 318–356 (2020).
    1. Hu, Y. et al. A report of three COVID‐19 cases with prolonged viral RNA detection in anal swabs. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26, 786–787 (2020).
    1. Seah, I.Y.J. et al. Assessing viral shedding and infectivity of tears in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients. Ophthalmology 127, 977–979 (2020).
    1. Liu, W.D. et al. Prolonged virus shedding even after seroconversion in a patient with COVID‐19. J. Infect. 81, 318–356 (2020).
    1. Xing, Y.H. et al. Prolonged viral shedding in feces of pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 53, 473–480 (2020).
    1. Qian, G.Q. et al. Duration of SARS‐CoV‐2 viral shedding during COVID‐19 infection. Infect. Dis. (Lond). 52, 511–512 (2020).
    1. Kim, E.S. et al. Clinical course and outcomes of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: a preliminary report of the first 28 patients from the Korean Cohort Study on COVID‐19. J. Korean Med. Sci. 35, e142 (2020).
    1. Colavita, F. et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 Isolation from ocular secretions of a patient with COVID‐19 in Italy with prolonged viral RNA detection. Ann. Intern. Med. 173, 242–243 (2020).
    1. Hill, K.J. et al. The index case of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Scotland. J. Infect. 81, 147–178 (2020).
    1. Huang, Y. et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 viral load in clinical samples from critically ill patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 201, 1435–1438 (2020).
    1. Zhou, R. et al. Viral dynamics in asymptomatic patients with COVID‐19. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 96, 288–290 (2020).
    1. Qi, L. et al. Factors associated with the duration of viral shedding in adults with COVID‐19 outside of Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 96, 531–537 (2020).
    1. Yuan, C. et al. Viral loads in throat and anal swabs in children infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 1233–1237 (2020).
    1. Huang, J.T. et al. Chronological changes of viral shedding in adult inpatients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 2158–2166 (2020).
    1. Kong, Y. et al. Successful treatment of a centenarian with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) using convalescent plasma. Transfus Apher. Sci. 59, 102820 (2020).
    1. Tam, P.C.K. et al. Detectable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) in human breast milk of a mildly symptomatic patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Clin. Infect. Dis. 72, 128–130 (2020).
    1. Yoon, J.G. et al. Clinical significance of a high SARS‐CoV‐2 viral load in the saliva. J. Korean Med. Sci. 35, e195 (2020).
    1. Phan, L.T. et al. Clinical features, isolation, and complete genome sequence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from the first two patients in Vietnam. J. Med. Virol. 92, 2209–2215 (2020).
    1. Klement‐Frutos, E. et al. Early administration of ritonavir‐boosted lopinavir could prevent severe COVID‐19. J. Infect. 82, 159–198 (2020).
    1. Gross, R. et al. Detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in human breastmilk. Lancet 395, 1757–1758 (2020).

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever