Smartphone Applications to Support Tuberculosis Prevention and Treatment: Review and Evaluation

Sarah J Iribarren, Rebecca Schnall, Patricia W Stone, Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Sarah J Iribarren, Rebecca Schnall, Patricia W Stone, Alex Carballo-Diéguez

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health problem and is the leading killer due to a single infectious disease. Mobile health (mHealth)-based tools such as smartphone apps have been suggested as tools to support TB control efforts (eg, identification, contact tracing, case management including patient support).

Objective: The purpose of this review was to identify and assess the functionalities of mobile apps focused on prevention and treatment of TB.

Methods: We searched 3 online mobile app stores. Apps were included if they were focused on TB and were in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. For each included app, 11 functionalities were assessed (eg, inform, instruct, record), and searches were conducted to identify peer-review publications of rigorous testing of the available apps.

Results: A total of 1332 potentially relevant apps were identified, with 24 meeting our inclusion criteria. All of the apps were free to download, but 7 required login and password and were developed for specific clinics, regional sites, or research studies. Targeted users were mainly clinicians (n=17); few (n=4) apps were patient focused. Most apps (n=17) had 4 or fewer functions out of 11 (range 1-6). The most common functionalities were inform and record (n=15). Although a number of apps were identified with various functionalities to support TB efforts, some had issues such as incorrect spelling and grammar, inconsistent responses to data entry, problems with crashing, or links to features that had no data. Of more concern, some apps provided potentially harmful information to patients, such as links to natural remedies for TB and natural healers. One-third of the apps (8/24) had not been updated for more than a year and may no longer be supported. Peer-reviewed publications were identified for only two of the included apps. In the gray literature (not found in the app stores), three TB-related apps were identified as in progress, being launched, or tested.

Conclusions: Apps identified for TB prevention and treatment had minimal functionality, primarily targeted frontline health care workers, and focused on TB information (eg, general information, guidelines, and news) or data collection (eg, replace paper-based notification or tracking). Few apps were developed for use by patients and none were developed to support TB patient involvement and management in their care (eg, follow-up alerts/reminders, side effects monitoring) or improve interaction with their health care providers, limiting the potential of these apps to facilitate patient-centered care. Our evaluation shows that more refined work is needed to be done in the area of apps to support patients with active TB. Involving TB patients in treatment in the design of these apps is recommended.

Keywords: mobile apps; mobile health; review; tuberculosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tuberculosis News, TB Proof.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Explain TB.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tuberculosis Symptoms Guide.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Tuberculosis (Amazon). Home remedies.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Tuberculosis (Google).

References

    1. Global Tuberculosis Report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. [2015-07-09]. .
    1. Global tuberculosis control: epidemiology, strategy, financing. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. [2016-02-02]. .
    1. Das PH, Horton R. Tuberculosis: time to accelerate progress. Lancet. 2010 May;375(9728):1755–1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60600-9.
    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487–497. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100.353/5/487
    1. Treatment for tuberculosis: guidelines, 4th Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. [2016-02-02]. .
    1. Denkinger CM, Grenier J, Stratis AK, Akkihal A, Pant-Pai N, Pai M. Mobile health to improve tuberculosis care and control: a call worth making. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Jun;17(6):719–727. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0638.ijtld120638
    1. Iribarren SJ, Rubinstein F, Discacciati V, Pearce PF. Listening to those at the frontline: patient and healthcare personnel perspectives on tuberculosis treatment barriers and facilitators in high TB burden regions of Argentina. Tuberculosis Res Treatment. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/135823.
    1. Ackerman M, Locatis C. Advanced networks and computing in healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):523–538. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000054. amiajnl-2010-000054
    1. Hale K, Capra S, Bauer J. A framework to assist health professionals in recommending high-quality apps for supporting chronic disease self-management: illustrative assessment of type 2 diabetes apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(3):e87. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4532. v3i3e87
    1. mHealth app developer economics 2014: the state of the art of mHealth app publishing. Berlin, Germany: research2guidance; 2014. [2015-11-18]. .
    1. Patient adoption of mHealth: use, evidence and remaining barriers to mainstream acceptance. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2015. [2016-02-02]. .
    1. Patient apps for improved healthcare: from novelty to mainstream. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2013. [2016-02-02]. .
    1. Nielsen J, Mack RL. Usability Inspection Methods. New York NY: Wiley; 1994.
    1. Zhang J, Johnson TR, Patel VL, Paige DL, Kubose T. Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(1-2):23–30. S1532046403000601
    1. Poole ES. HCI and mobile health interventions: How human-computer interaction can contribute to successful mobile health interventions. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Dec;3(4):402–405. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0214-3. 214
    1. de la Vega R, Miró J. mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101312. PONE-D-14-09323
    1. Martínez-Pérez B, de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M, Sainz-de Abajo B. Comparison of mobile apps for the leading causes of death among different income zones: a review of the literature and app stores. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2779. v2i1e1
    1. Wallace LS, Dhingra LK. A systematic review of smartphone applications for chronic pain available for download in the United States. J Opioid Manag. 2014;10(1):63–68. doi: 10.5055/jom.2014.0193.jom.2014.0193
    1. Shen N, Levitan M, Johnson A, Bender JL, Hamilton-Page M, Jadad Alejandro AR, Wiljer D. Finding a depression app: a review and content analysis of the depression app marketplace. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e16. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3713. v3i1e16
    1. Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR. A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2661. v15i12e287
    1. Schnall R, Iribarren SJ. Review and analysis of existing mobile phone applications for health care-associated infection prevention. Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jun;43(6):572–576. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.021.S0196-6553(15)00039-5
    1. Schnall R, Bakken S, Rojas M, Travers J, Carballo-Dieguez A. mHealth technology as a persuasive tool for treatment, care and management of persons living with HIV. AIDS Behav (Suppl 2) 2015;19(02):81–89. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0984-8.
    1. BinDhim NF, Hawkey A, Trevena L. A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps. Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):97–104. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0088.
    1. International Standards for Tuberculosis Care, 3rd edition. Hague: TB CARE I; 2014. [2015-11-18]. .
    1. Breuninger M, Philipsen Rick, Mhimbira F, Hella JJ, Lwilla F, van den Hombergh J, Ross A, Jugheli L, Wagner D, Reither K. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in chest radiographs: a validation study from sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106381. PONE-D-14-07412
    1. Clark AM, Sarker M, Ekins S. New target prediction and visualization tools incorporating open source molecular fingerprints for TB Mobile 2.0. J Cheminform. 2014;6:38. doi: 10.1186/s13321-014-0038-2. s13321-014-0038-2
    1. Ekins S, Clark AM, Sarker M. TB Mobile: a mobile app for anti-tuberculosis molecules with known targets. J Cheminform. 2013;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-13. 1758-2946-5-13
    1. Chaiyachati KH, Loveday M, Lorenz S, Lesh N, Larkan L, Cinti S, Friedland GH, Haberer JE. A pilot study of an mHealth application for healthcare workers: poor uptake despite high reported acceptability at a rural South African community-based MDR-TB treatment program. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064662. PONE-D-13-04178
    1. Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) mobile application for health care providers. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Tuberculosis Elimination; 2013. Dec 9, [2015-11-18]. .
    1. Mobile application strengthens Myanmar's fight against MDR-TB. FHI 360; 2014. Oct 28, [2015-07-07]. .
    1. Pal S. dna. Mumbai: Diligent Media Corporation; 2014. Mar 19, [2015-08-11]. Govt launches mobile app to make TB notification simpler .
    1. Ha YP, Littman-Quinn R, Antwi C, Seropola G, Green RS, Tesfalul MA, Ho-Foster A, Luberti AA, Holmes JH, Steenhoff AP, Kovarik CL. A mobile health approach to tuberculosis contact tracing in resource-limited settings. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1188.
    1. FDA issues final guidance on mobile medical apps. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2013. [2015-07-25]. .
    1. Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2015. [2016-02-02]. .
    1. The global OpenMRS community works together to build the world's leading open source enterprise electronic medical record system platform. OpenMRS; 2015. [2015-08-11].
    1. Principles for digital development. Digital Development Principles Working Group; 2015. [2015-08-11].
    1. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422. v3i1e27
    1. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2968. v16i4e104
    1. Bailey SC, Belter LT, Pandit AU, Carpenter DM, Carlos E, Wolf MS. The availability, functionality, and quality of mobile applications supporting medication self-management. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(3):542–546. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002232. amiajnl-2013-002232
    1. Becker S, Kribben A, Meister S, Diamantidis CJ, Unger N, Mitchell A. User profiles of a smartphone application to support drug adherence--experiences from the iNephro project. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078547. PONE-D-13-10143
    1. Belisario JM, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH. Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD010013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2.
    1. Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Proudfoot J, Christensen H. MobileaApps for bipolar disorder: A systematic review of features and content quality. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(8):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4581. v17i8e198

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever