Text message-based intervention, Keeping in Touch (KiT), to support youth as they transition to adult type 1 diabetes care: a protocol for a multisite randomised controlled superiority trial

Geetha Sanmugalingham, Elise Mok, Joseph A Cafazzo, Laura Desveaux, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Gillian L Booth, Marley Greenberg, Jessica Kichler, Valeria E Rac, Peter Austin, Ellen Goldbloom, Mélanie Henderson, Alanna Landry, Ian Zenlea, Madison Taylor, Meranda Nakhla, Rayzel Shulman, Geetha Sanmugalingham, Elise Mok, Joseph A Cafazzo, Laura Desveaux, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Gillian L Booth, Marley Greenberg, Jessica Kichler, Valeria E Rac, Peter Austin, Ellen Goldbloom, Mélanie Henderson, Alanna Landry, Ian Zenlea, Madison Taylor, Meranda Nakhla, Rayzel Shulman

Abstract

Introduction: Transition from paediatric to adult care can be challenging for youth living with type 1 diabetes (T1D), as many youth feel unprepared to transfer to adult care and are at high risk for deterioration of glycaemic management and acute complications. Existing strategies to improve transition experience and outcomes are limited by cost, scalability, generalisability and youth engagement. Text messaging is an acceptable, accessible and cost-effective way of engaging youth. Together with adolescents and emerging adults and paediatric and adult T1D providers, we co-designed a text message-based intervention, Keeping in Touch (KiT), to deliver tailored transition support. Our primary objective is to test the effectiveness of KiT on diabetes self-efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.

Methods and analysis: We will randomise 183 adolescents with T1D aged 17-18 years within 4 months of their final paediatric diabetes visit to the intervention or usual care. KiT will deliver tailored T1D transition support via text messages over 12 months based on a transition readiness assessment. The primary outcome, self-efficacy for diabetes self-management, will be measured 12 months after enrolment. Secondary outcomes, measured at 6 and 12 months, include transition readiness, perceived T1D-related stigma, time between final paediatric and first adult diabetes visits, haemoglobin A1c, and other glycaemia measures (for continuous glucose monitor users), diabetes-related hospitalisations and emergency department visits and the cost of implementing the intervention. The analysis will be intention-to-treat comparing diabetes self-efficacy at 12 months between groups. A process evaluation will be conducted to identify elements of the intervention and individual-level factors influencing implementation and outcomes.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol version 7 July 2022 and accompanying documents were approved by Clinical Trials Ontario (Project ID: 3986) and the McGill University Health Centre (MP-37-2023-8823). Study findings will be presented at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: NCT05434754.

Keywords: adolescent; clinical trials; diabetes & endocrinology; paediatric endocrinology; patient participation; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RS and A-SB have received speaking fees from Dexcom. EG is the Site Co-Investigator role for Medtronic study grant to the institution and Chair of Epic® Pediatric Endocrinology Specialty Steering Board. IZ reports receiving personal fees from Abbott Diabetes Care and Novo Nordisk Canada Inc. and research funding support from the University of Toronto, Navigator Limited, the Medical Psychiatry Alliance, Regional Municipality of Peel, Community Foundation of Mississauga, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). MH is recipient of the 2019 Canadian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism’s Young Investigator Award, and a FRQS Senior salary award. Her research has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Diabète Québec and Fonds de recherche en Santé du québec (FRQS).

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Ward ZJ, Yeh JM, Reddy CL, et al. . Estimating the total incidence of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents aged 0–19 years from 1990 to 2050: a global simulation-based analysis. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2022;10:848–58. 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00276-5
    1. Gregory GA, Robinson TIG, Linklater SE, et al. . Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022;10:741–60. 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00218-2
    1. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: diabetes control and complications trial. J Pediatr 1994;125:177–88. 10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70190-3
    1. Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres . A guideline for transition from paediatric to adult health care for youth with special health care needs: a national approach; 2016.
    1. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol 2000;55:469–80. 10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469
    1. Wafa S, Nakhla M. Improving the transition from pediatric to adult diabetes healthcare: a literature review. Can J Diabetes 2015;39:520–8. 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.003
    1. Shulman R, Shah BR, Fu L, et al. . Diabetes transition care and adverse events: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Diabet Med 2018;35:1515–22. 10.1111/dme.13782
    1. Nakhla M, Daneman D, To T, et al. . Transition to adult care for youths with diabetes mellitus: findings from a universal health care system. Pediatrics 2009;124:e1134–41. 10.1542/peds.2009-0041
    1. Garvey KC, Wolpert HA, Rhodes ET, et al. . Health care transition in patients with type 1 diabetes: young adult experiences and relationship to glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1716–22. 10.2337/dc11-2434
    1. Lotstein DS, Seid M, Klingensmith G, et al. . Transition from pediatric to adult care for youth diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in adolescence. Pediatrics 2013;131:e1062–70. 10.1542/peds.2012-1450
    1. Pacaud D, Yale JF, Stephure D, et al. . Problems in transition from pediatric care to adult care for individuals with diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2005;29:13–8.
    1. Frank M. Factors associated with non-compliance with a medical follow-up regimen after discharge from a pediatric diabetes clinic. Can J Diabetes 1996;20:13–20.
    1. Van Walleghem N, Macdonald CA, Dean HJ. Evaluation of a systems navigator model for transition from pediatric to adult care for young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1529–30. 10.2337/dc07-2247
    1. Butalia S, Crawford SG, McGuire KA, et al. . Improved transition to adult care in youth with type 1 diabetes: a pragmatic clinical trial. Diabetologia 2021;64:758–66. 10.1007/s00125-020-05368-1
    1. Spaic T, Robinson T, Goldbloom E, et al. . Closing the gap: results of the multicenter Canadian randomized controlled trial of structured transition in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019;42:1018–26. 10.2337/dc18-2187
    1. Bisno DI, Reid MW, Fogel JL, et al. . Virtual group appointments reduce distress and improve care management in young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022;16:1419–27. 10.1177/19322968211035768
    1. Coad J, Toft A, Claridge L, et al. . Using mobile phone technology to support young liver transplant recipients moving to adult services. Prog Transplant 2017;27:207–18. 10.1177/1526924817699958
    1. Deacon AJ, Edirippulige S. Using mobile technology to motivate adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of recent literature. J Telemed Telecare 2015;21:431–8. 10.1177/1357633X15605223
    1. Los E, Ulrich J, Guttmann-Bauman I. Technology use in transition-age patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2016;10:662–8. 10.1177/1932296816632543
    1. Hanauer DA, Wentzell K, Laffel N, et al. . Computerized automated reminder diabetes system (cards): e-mail and SMS cell phone text messaging reminders to support diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:99–106. 10.1089/dia.2008.0022
    1. Huang JS, Terrones L, Tompane T, et al. . Preparing adolescents with chronic disease for transition to adult care: a technology program. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1639–46. 10.1542/peds.2013-2830
    1. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada. 4th edn. 2017:76.
    1. Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, et al. . Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (cheers 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ 2022;376:e067975. 10.1136/bmj-2021-067975
    1. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, et al. . Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, ed. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019: 843–60. 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4
    1. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, et al. . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988;15:351–77. 10.1177/109019818801500401
    1. Corathers SD, Yi-Frazier JP, Kichler JC, et al. . Development and implementation of the readiness assessment of emerging adults with type 1 diabetes diagnosed in youth (READDY) tool. Diabetes Spectr 2020;33:99–103. 10.2337/ds18-0075
    1. Cianci R, Yan Z, Shulman R, et al. . Online educational resources for youth transitioning to adult diabetes care: an environmental scan of Canadian content. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2021;45:S14. 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.09.045
    1. Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P. A comparison of individual and area-based socio-economic data for monitoring social inequalities in health. Health Rep 2009;20:85–94.
    1. Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P. Health inequalities, deprivation, immigration and Aboriginality in Canada: a geographic perspective. Can J Public Health 2010;101:470–4. 10.1007/BF03403966
    1. Hanas R, John G, International HBA1c Consensus Committee . 2010 consensus statement on the worldwide standardization of the hemoglobin A1c measurement. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1903–4. 10.2337/dc10-0953
    1. Locke EA. Self-Efficacy: the exercise of control. Pers Psychol 1997;50:801.
    1. Holden G. The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health related outcomes. Social Work in Health Care 1992;16:53–93. 10.1300/J010v16n01_05
    1. Iannotti RJ, Schneider S, Nansel TR, et al. . Self-Efficacy, outcome expectations, and diabetes self-management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2006;27:98–105. 10.1097/00004703-200604000-00003
    1. Mulvaney SA, Hood KK, Schlundt DG, et al. . Development and initial validation of the barriers to diabetes adherence measure for adolescents. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94:77–83. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.010
    1. Kosse RC, Bouvy ML, Belitser SV, et al. . Effective engagement of adolescent asthma patients with mobile health-supporting medication adherence. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7:e12411. 10.2196/12411
    1. Addala A, Auzanneau M, Miller K, et al. . A decade of disparities in diabetes technology use and HbA1c in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a transatlantic comparison. Diabetes Care 2021;44:133–40. 10.2337/dc20-0257
    1. Inflation Calculator . Bank of Canada. 2021. Available: [Accessed 7 Dec 2022].
    1. Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2020;18:17. 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9
    1. Table 22-10-0143-01 smartphone personal use and selected smartphone habits by gender and age group: Statistics Canada. 2021. Available: [Accessed 7 Dec 2022].

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever