Verbal De-escalation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA De-escalation Workgroup

Janet S Richmond, Jon S Berlin, Avrim B Fishkind, Garland H Holloman Jr, Scott L Zeller, Michael P Wilson, Muhamad Aly Rifai, Anthony T Ng, Janet S Richmond, Jon S Berlin, Avrim B Fishkind, Garland H Holloman Jr, Scott L Zeller, Michael P Wilson, Muhamad Aly Rifai, Anthony T Ng

Abstract

Agitation is an acute behavioral emergency requiring immediate intervention. Traditional methods of treating agitated patients, ie, routine restraints and involuntary medication, have been replaced with a much greater emphasis on a noncoercive approach. Experienced practitioners have found that if such interventions are undertaken with genuine commitment, successful outcomes can occur far more often than previously thought possible. In the new paradigm, a 3-step approach is used. First, the patient is verbally engaged; then a collaborative relationship is established; and, finally, the patient is verbally de-escalated out of the agitated state. Verbal de-escalation is usually the key to engaging the patient and helping him become an active partner in his evaluation and treatment; although, we also recognize that in some cases nonverbal approaches, such as voluntary medication and environment planning, are also important. When working with an agitated patient, there are 4 main objectives: (1) ensure the safety of the patient, staff, and others in the area; (2) help the patient manage his emotions and distress and maintain or regain control of his behavior; (3) avoid the use of restraint when at all possible; and (4) avoid coercive interventions that escalate agitation. The authors detail the proper foundations for appropriate training for de-escalation and provide intervention guidelines, using the "10 domains of de-escalation."

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding, sources, and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.

References

    1. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Wasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood: attending to patient requests in a walk-in clinic. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32:553–558.
    1. Shame Lazare A. and humiliation in the medical encounter. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1653–1658.
    1. Day RK. Psychomotor agitation: poorly defined and badly measured. J Affect Disord. 1999;55:89–98.
    1. Lindenmayer JP. The pathophysiology of agitation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61((suppl 14)):5–10.
    1. Nordstrom K, Allen MH. Managing the acutely agitated and psychotic patient. CNS Spectr. 2007;12((suppl 17)):5–11.
    1. Zeller SL, Rhoades RW. Systematic reviews of assessment measures and pharmacologic treatments for agitation. Clin Ther. 2010;32:403–425.
    1. Holloman GH, Jr, Zeller SL. Overview of Project BETA: best practices in evaluation and treatment of agitation. West J Emerg Med. 2011;13:1–2.
    1. Beck JC, White KA, Gage B. Emergency psychiatric assessment of violence. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1562–1565.
    1. Compton MT, Craw J, Rudisch BE. Determinants of inpatient psychiatric length of stay in an urban county hospital. Psychiatr Q. 2006;77:173–188.
    1. Knutzen M, Mjosund NH, Eidhammer G, et al. Characteristics of psychiatric inpatients who experienced restraint and those who did not: a case-control study. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:492–497.
    1. Allen MH, Currier GW, Carpenter D, et al. The expert consensus guideline series: treatment of behavioral emergencies. 2005;2005;2005;1111((suppl 1))((suppl 1)):110–112. 5–108. quiz in J Psychiatr Pract. J Psychiatr Pract.
    1. Isbister GK, Calver LA, Page CB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intramuscular droperidol versus midazolam for violence and acute behavioral disturbance: the DORM study. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:392–401.
    1. Livingston JD, Verdun-Jones S, Brink J, et al. A narrative review of the effectiveness of aggression management training programs for psychiatric hospital staff. J Forensic Nurs. 2010;6:15–28.
    1. Morrison EF. An evaluation of four programs for the management of aggression in psychiatric settings. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2003;17:146–155.
    1. Farrell G, Cubit K. Nurses under threat: a comparison of content of 28 aggression management programs. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2005;14:44–53.
    1. Dupont RT. The crisis intervention team model: an intersection point for the criminal justice system and the psychiatric emergency service. In: Glick RL, Berlin JS, Fishkind AB, et al., editors. Emergency Psychiatry: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
    1. The University of Memphis. CIT. CIT Center Web site. Available at: . Accessed August 29, 2011.
    1. Allen M, Forster P, Zealberg J, et al. Report and recommendations regarding psychiatric emergency and crisis services: A review and model program descriptions. American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Psychiatric Emergency Services Web site. Available at: . Accessed June 13, 2011.
    1. Smith MJ. When I Say No, I Feel Guilty: How To Cope – Using the Skills of Systematic Assertive Therapy. New York, NY: Dial Press/Bantum Books;; 1975.
    1. Fishkind A, Agitation II: Glick RL, Berlin JS, Fishkind AB, et al, eds. Emergency Psychiatry: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. De-escalation of the aggressive patient and avoiding coercion.
    1. Swift RH, Harrigan EP, Cappelleri JC, et al. Validation of the behavioural activity rating scale (BARS): a novel measure of activity in agitated patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2002;36:87–95.
    1. Yudofsky SC, Silver JM, Jackson W, et al. The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143:35–39.
    1. Brizer DA, Convit A, Krakowski M, et al. A rating scale for reporting violence on psychiatric wards. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987;38:769–770.
    1. Palmstierna T, Wistedt B. Staff observation aggression scale, SOAS: presentation and evaluation. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987;76:657–663.
    1. Elgin SH. Language in Emergency Medicine: A Verbal Self-Defense Handbook. Bloomington, IN: XLibris Corporation;; 1999.
    1. Kleespies PM, Richmond JS. Evaluating behavioral emergencies: the clinical interview. In: Kleespies PM, editor. Behavioral Emergencies: An Evidence-Based Resource for Evaluating and Managing Risk of Suicide, Violence, and Victimization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association;; 2008. pp. 33–35.
    1. Fishkind A. Calming agitation with words, not drugs: 10 commandments for safety. Current Psych. 2002;2011;1(4) Available at: . Accessed June 13,
    1. Lazare A, Levy RS. Apologizing for humiliations in medical practice. Chest. 2011;139:746–751.
    1. Moyer KE. Kinds of aggression and their physiological basis. Commun Behav Biol. 1968;2:65–87.
    1. Barnhart TE. Four types of correctional violence. Corrections Web site. Available at: . Accessed September 2, 2011.
    1. MacYoung M. Four types of violence. No Nonsense Self-Defense Web site. Available at: . Accessed September 2, 2011.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever