Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of smartphone addiction among working adults in China

Li Li, Trisha T C Lin, Li Li, Trisha T C Lin

Abstract

Background: Smartphones currently dominate people's lives and interests due to their increased affordability and functionality. However, the negative aspects of smartphone use, such as smartphone addiction, have recently been brought up. This study utilized a qualitative approach to explore the symptoms of smartphone addiction among working adults in China and the psychological factors that affect such addiction.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews, either face to face or via Skype (online), were conducted with 32 Chinese workers. The collected data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach in Nvivo 10 software.

Results: This study identified four typical symptoms of smartphone addiction, namely, withdrawal (e.g., experiencing negative feelings when having no access to smartphones), salience (e.g., constant checking and thinking about smartphones), conflict (e.g., smartphone use interferes with family and work life), and phantom phone signals (e.g., illusory perception of a phone vibrating or ringing). Conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extroversion increase the likelihood of smartphone addiction. Notably, this study found that conscientious workers are likely to develop smartphone addiction, a finding that is contrary to those of the majority of existing studies on technological addiction.

Conclusions: This study revealed various smartphone addiction symptoms among young Chinese workers, and these include withdrawal, salience, conflicts, and phantom phone signals. Conscientious, neurotic, and extroverted employees are likely to exhibit these symptoms.

Keywords: China; Psychological factors; Smartphone addiction; Symptoms; Working adults.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Pew Research Center. U.S. smartphone use in 2015. 2015 [cited 2019 07 June]; Available from: .
    1. Park N, Lee H. Nature of youth smartphone addiction in Korea. 언 론 정 보 연 구. 2014;51(1):100–132.
    1. Flurry . Mobile addicts growing at a rapid space, over half of them are females. 2014.
    1. Bian M, Leung L. Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2015;33(1):61–79. doi: 10.1177/0894439314528779.
    1. Lin TTC, Chiang Y, Jiang Q. Sociable people beware? Investigating smartphone vs. non-smartphone dependency symptoms among young Singaporeans. Soc Behav Pers. 2015;43(7):1209–1216. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.7.1209.
    1. Oulasvirta A, Rattenbury T, Ma L, Raita E. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2012;16(1):105–114. doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2.
    1. . Over the half of Qingdao white-collar workers are mobile dependents: feel nervous without touching smartphones for a while. 2015.
    1. Sina . Around 80 percent white-collar workers have mobile phone dependency symptoms. 2013.
    1. Kim H. Exercise rehabilitation for smartphone addiction. J Exer Rehabil. 2013;9(6):500–505. doi: 10.12965/jer.130080.
    1. Li L, Lin TT. Smartphones at work: a qualitative exploration of psychological antecedents and impacts of work-related smartphone dependency. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:1609406918822240.
    1. van Deursen AJ, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PA. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039.
    1. Zhang KZ, Chen C, Lee MK. Proceedings of the 18th pacific asia conference on information systems, Chendu, China. 2014. Understanding the role of motives in smartphone addiction.
    1. Chiu SI. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on taiwanese university student: a mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;34:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.024.
    1. Rush S. Problematic use of smart phones in the workplace: an introductory study. BA thesis. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University. 2011.
    1. Lee YK, Chang CT, Lin Y, Cheng ZH. The dark side of smartphone usage: psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:373–383. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.047.
    1. Park BW, Lee KC. The effect of users’ characteristics and experiential factors on the compulsive usage of the smartphone. In: Grosky WI, Kim TH, Mohammed S, Saha SK, editors. Ubiquitous computing and multimedia applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. pp. 438–446.
    1. Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. J Child Media. 2008;2(2):93–113. doi: 10.1080/17482790802078565.
    1. Walsh SP, White KM, Young RM. Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. J Adolesc. 2008;31(1):77–92. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.04.004.
    1. Griffiths M. Internet addiction: fact or fiction? Psychologist. 1999;12(5):246–250.
    1. Charlton JP. A factor analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement. Br J Psychol. 2002;93(3):329–344. doi: 10.1348/000712602760146242.
    1. Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558.
    1. Brown RIF. Some contributions of the study of gambling to the study of other addictions. Gambling Behavior and Problem Gambling. 1993;1:241–72.
    1. Brown RIF. A theoretical model of the behavioral addictions-applied to offending. In: Hodge JE, McMurran M, Hollin CR, editors. Addicted to crime. Chichester: Wiley; 1997.
    1. Griffiths MD, Hunt N. Dependence on computer games by adolescents. Psychol Rep. 1998;82(2):475–480. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.82.2.475.
    1. Charlton JP, Danforth ID. Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Comput Hum Behav. 2007;23(3):1531–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.002.
    1. Park N, Kim YC, Shon HY, Shim H. Factors influencing smartphone use and dependency in South Korea. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(4):1763–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.008.
    1. Goldberg LR. An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(6):1216–1229. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.
    1. John OP, Laura PN, Christopher JS. Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and conceptual issues. In: Oliver PJ, Richard WR, Lawrence AP, editors. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford; 2008. pp. 114–158.
    1. McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992;60(2):175–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.
    1. Tanis M, Beukeboom CJ, Hartmann T, Vermeulen IE. Phantom phone signals: an investigation into the prevalence and predictors of imagined cell phone signals. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51:356–362. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.039.
    1. Pisano S, Muratori P, Senese VP, Gorga C, Siciliano M, Carotenuto M, et al. Phantom phone signals in youths: prevalence, correlates and relation to psychopathology. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210095.
    1. King ALS, Valença AM, Silva ACO, Baczynski T, Carvalho MR, Nardi AE. Nomophobia: dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(1):140–144. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.025.
    1. Vanitha J. Nomophobia-do we really need to worry about? J Nurs Trendz. 2014;5(3):14–17.
    1. TrendForce . 2015 Q1 smartphone market share in China. 2015.
    1. Roberts JA, Pullig C, Manolis C. I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Personal Individ Differ. 2015;79:13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049.
    1. Takao M. Problematic mobile phone use and big-five personality domains. Indian J Community Med. 2014;39(2):111–113. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.132736.
    1. Gnisci A, Perugini M, Pedone R, Di CA. Construct validation of the use, abuse and dependence on the internet inventory. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(1):240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.002.
    1. Andreassen C, Griffiths M, Gjertsen S, Krossbakken E, Kvam S, Pallesen S. The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(2):90–99. doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003.
    1. Wilson K, Fornasier S, White KM. Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13(2):173–177. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0094.
    1. Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychol Behav. 2005;8(1):39–51. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39.
    1. Hong FY, Chiu SI, Huang DH. A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, smartphone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese female university students. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(6):2152–2159. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020.
    1. Ezoe S, Toda M, Yoshimura K, Naritomi A, Den R, Morimoto K. Relationships of personality and lifestyle with mobile phone dependence among female nursing students. Soc Behav Personal Int J. 2009;37(2):231–238. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.231.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever