Modified Alvarado Scoring System as a diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania

Emmanuel S Kanumba, Joseph B Mabula, Peter Rambau, Phillipo L Chalya, Emmanuel S Kanumba, Joseph B Mabula, Peter Rambau, Phillipo L Chalya

Abstract

Background: Decision-making in patients with acute appendicitis poses a diagnostic challenge worldwide, despite much advancement in abdominal surgery. The Modified Alvarado Scoring System (MASS) has been reported to be a cheap and quick diagnostic tool in patients with acute appendicitis. However, differences in diagnostic accuracy have been observed if the scores were applied to various populations and clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Modified Alvarado Scoring System in patients with acute appendicitis in our setting.

Methods: A cross-sectional study involving all patients suspected to have acute appendicitis at Bugando Medical Centre over a six-month period between November 2008 and April 2009 was conducted. All patients who met the inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled in the study. They were evaluated on admission using the MASS to determine whether they had acute appendicitis or not. All patients underwent appendicectomy according to the hospital protocol. The decision to operate was the prerogative of the surgeon or surgical resident based on overall clinical judgment and not the MASS. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination. Data was collected using a pre-tested coded questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS statistical computer software.

Results: A total number of 127 patients were studied. Their ages ranged from eight to 76 years (mean 29.64 ± 12.97). There were 37 (29.1%) males and 90 (70.9%) females (M: F = 1:2.4). All patients in this study underwent appendicectomy. The perforation rate was 9.4%. Histopathological examination confirmed appendicitis in 85 patients (66.9%) and the remaining 42 patients had normal appendix giving a negative appendicectomy rate of 33.1% (26.8% for males and 38.3% for females). The sensitivity and specificity of MASS in this study were 94.1% (males 95.8% and females 88.3%) and 90.4% (males 92.9% and females 89.7%) respectively. The Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value were 95.2% (males 95.5% and females 90.6%) and 88.4% (males 89.3% and females 80.1%) respectively. The accuracy of MASS was 92.9% (males 91.5% and females 87.6%).

Conclusion: The study shows that use of MASS in patients suspected to have acute appendicitis provides a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and can be employed at Bugando Medical Centre to improve the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis and subsequently reduces negative appendicectomy and complication rates. However, additional investigations may be required to confirm the diagnosis in case of atypical presentation.

References

    1. Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn Med. 1999;11:137–40.
    1. Cuschieri A. In: Essential surgical practice. 3. Cuscheri A, Giles GR, Mossa AR, editor. London: Butter worth Heinman; 1995. The small intestine and vermiform appendix; pp. 1325–8.
    1. Jaffe B&BD. In: The Appendix. Brunicardi FEiC, editor. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery New York: Mc-Graw Hill Companies lnc; 2005.
    1. Dado G, Anania G, Baccarani U, Marcotti E, Donini A, Risaliti A. Application of a clinical score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in childhood. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;11:1320–2. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.9316.
    1. Paulson Eal. Clinical Practice. Suspected Appendicitis. N E J M. 2003;11:236–242.
    1. Gilmore OJA, Jones D, Ynag Q. Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. Lancet. 1975;11:421–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)90841-7.
    1. Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg. 1994;11:418–9.
    1. Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg. 1995;11:273–81.
    1. Fenyo G, Lindberg G, Blind P, Enochsson L, Oberg A. Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system. Eur J Surg Med. 1997;11:831–8.
    1. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg. 1986;11:557–65. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3.
    1. Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg. 1995;11:273–81.
    1. Khan Ikramullah, Ata ur Rehman. Application of Alvarado Scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005.
    1. Said HS, Chavda SK. Use of Modified Alvarado Score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. East African Medical Journal. 2003;11:411–414.
    1. Edino ST, Mohammed AZ, Ochicha O, Anumah M. Appendicitis in Kano, Nigeria: A 5-year review of pattern, morbidity and mortality. Annals of African Medicine. 2004;11:38–41.
    1. Asefa Z. Pattern of acute abdomen in Yirgalem Hospital, southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2000;11(4):227–235.
    1. Blisard D. Institutioning a clinical guideline to decrease the rate of negative appendicectomy. American Surgeon. 2003;11:796–798.
    1. Larsson PG, Tronstard SE. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy and improves diagnosis in fertile woman. A Randomized study. Surgical endoscopy. 2001;11:200–202. doi: 10.1007/s004640000255.
    1. Naaeder SB, Archampong EQ. Clinical spectrum of acute abdominal pain in Accra, Ghana. Nigerian journal of medicine. 1999;11:13–16.
    1. Adesunkanmi ARK, Agbakwuru EA, Adekunle KA. Pattern and outcome of acute appendicitis in semi-urban and rural African communities: A study of 125 patients. Nigerian Medical Practitioner. 1998;11:8–11.
    1. Daelalin L. Acute appendicitis during the first three years of life. Acta Chir Scan. 1982;11:291.
    1. Horatas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D. A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am J Surg. 1990;11:291. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(06)80026-7.
    1. Ogbonna BC, Obekpa PO, Momoh JI, Ige JT, Ihezue CH. Another look at acute appendicitis in tropical Africa: the value of laparoscopy in diagnosis. Trop Doct. 1993;11:82–84.
    1. Okobia MN, Osime U, Aligbe JU. Acute appendicitis: review of the rate of negative appendicectomy in Benin City. Nigerian Journal of Surgery. 1999;11:1–5.
    1. Flum DR, Morris A, Koespell T, Delinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased overtime? A population based analysis. JAMA. 2001;11:1748. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1748.
    1. Ojo OS, Udeh SC, Odesanmi WO. Reviews of the histopathological finding in appendicectomies for acute appendicitis in Nigerians. J R Coll Surg Edin. 1991;11:245–248.
    1. Duvie SOA, Diffange MN, Gurgui S. The effects of Schistosoma haematobium on the vermiform appendix: the Nigerian experience. J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;11:13–18.
    1. Jeerapata. The Modified Alvarado score versus Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The THAI journal of Surgery. 2005;11:69–72.
    1. Sanjot B. One-year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis in adults. Indian journal of surgery. 2008;11:125–129. doi: 10.1007/s12262-008-0035-7.
    1. Shrivastava UK, Gupta A, Sharma D. Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Trop Gastroenterol. 2004;11:184–6.
    1. Sadiq M, Amir S. Efficacy of modified Alvarado scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2002;11:72–7.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever