Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition

Clare Walton, Rachel King, Lindsay Rechtman, Wendy Kaye, Emmanuelle Leray, Ruth Ann Marrie, Neil Robertson, Nicholas La Rocca, Bernard Uitdehaag, Ingrid van der Mei, Mitchell Wallin, Anne Helme, Ceri Angood Napier, Nick Rijke, Peer Baneke, Clare Walton, Rachel King, Lindsay Rechtman, Wendy Kaye, Emmanuelle Leray, Ruth Ann Marrie, Neil Robertson, Nicholas La Rocca, Bernard Uitdehaag, Ingrid van der Mei, Mitchell Wallin, Anne Helme, Ceri Angood Napier, Nick Rijke, Peer Baneke

Abstract

Background: High-quality epidemiologic data worldwide are needed to improve our understanding of disease risk, support health policy to meet the diverse needs of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and support advocacy efforts.

Objectives: The Atlas of MS is an open-source global compendium of data regarding the epidemiology of MS and the availability of resources for people with MS reported at country, regional and global levels.

Methods: Country representatives reported epidemiologic data and their sources via survey between September 2019 and March 2020, covering prevalence and incidence in males, females and children, and age and MS type at diagnosis. Regional analyses and comparisons with 2013 data were conducted.

Results: A total of 2.8 million people are estimated to live with MS worldwide (35.9 per 100,000 population). MS prevalence has increased in every world region since 2013 but gaps in prevalence estimates persist. The pooled incidence rate across 75 reporting countries is 2.1 per 100,000 persons/year, and the mean age of diagnosis is 32 years. Females are twice as likely to live with MS as males.

Conclusions: The global prevalence of MS has risen since 2013, but good surveillance data is not universal. Action is needed by multiple stakeholders to close knowledge gaps.

Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; epidemiology.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CW, RK, AH, CAN, NRi and PB are employees of Multiple Sclerosis International Federation which receives money from a range of corporate sponsors, recently including Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb (formerly Celgene), Genzyme, Med-Day, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche. LR and WK are employees of McKing Consulting Corporation which received contract funding from the National MS Society. EL receives research funding from Fondation ARSEP, Fondation EDMUS and Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament and reports consulting and lecture fees or travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis and Roche. RAM receives research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the MS Society of Canada, MS Scientific Foundation, the National MS Society, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, The Arthritis Society and the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. NRo receives research funding from the MRC, MS Society, Biogen, Novartis and Genzyme and has received consultancy fees from Abbvie, Novartis, Genzyme and Celgene outside the submitted work. BU received consultancy fees from Genzyme, Merck, Biogen and Novartis, outside the submitted work. NLR, IvdM and MW have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map showing geographic variation in MS prevalence and in data confidence scoresa by country: (a) MS prevalence per 100,000 population by country shown in shades of orange and red as per the key. Countries without prevalence data are shown in grey. (b) Confidence score assigned to each country based on the prevalence data sources provided. Scores of very low, low, moderate or high are shown in shades of orange and red as per the key. Countries without prevalence data or with data but no source information provided are shown in grey. aCountry confidence scores were assigned using four variables: (1) size of the population covered by data source, from 0 if unknown to 5 if covering the whole country; (2) year of data collection by source, from 0 if prior to 2009 to 5 if in 2017–2019; (3) type of data source, from 0 if unknown to 5 if peer-reviewed journal publication; (4) additional points were given for meeting certain methodological criteria: using the 2017 McDonald Criteria, performing a validation step or using multiple consistent data sources for the estimate. Confidence ratings were assigned based on the total scores using the following thresholds: ⩽5 = very low, 6–10 = low, 11–15 = moderate, ⩾16 = high.

References

    1. Beiki O, Frumento P, Bottai M, et al. Changes in the risk of reaching multiple sclerosis disability milestones in recent decades: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Sweden. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76(6): 665–671.
    1. Goodin DS, Reder AT, Ebers GC, et al. Survival in MS: A randomized cohort study 21 years after the start of the pivotal IFNβ-1b trial. Neurology 2012; 78(17): 1315–1322.
    1. Browne P, Chandraratna D, Angood C, et al. Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: A growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology 2014; 83(11): 1022–1024.
    1. The Multiple Sclerosis International Federation Atlas of MS, 3rd ed, September, 2020,
    1. Wallin M, Culpepper W, Campbell J, et al. The prevalence of MS in the United States – A population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology 2019; 92(10): e1029–e1040.
    1. Yamout B, Assaad W, Tamim H, et al. Epidemiology and phenotypes of multiple sclerosis in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2020; 6(1): 2055217319841881.
    1. Boyko A, Melnikov M. Prevalence and incidence of multiple sclerosis in Russian federation: 30 years of studies. Brain Sci 2020; 10(5): 305.
    1. Kingwell E, Zhu F, Marrie RA, et al. High incidence and increasing prevalence of multiple sclerosis in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from over two decades (1991–2010). J Neurol 2015; 262(10): 2352–2363.
    1. Campbell JA, Simpson S, Ahmad H, et al. Change in multiple sclerosis prevalence over time in Australia 2010-2017 utilising disease-modifying therapy prescription data. Mult Scler 2020; 26: 1315–1328.
    1. Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Nichols E, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurology 2019; 8(3): 269–285.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever