Developing and assessing a new web-based tapping test for measuring distal movement in Parkinson's disease: a Distal Finger Tapping test

Noreen Akram, Haoxuan Li, Aaron Ben-Joseph, Caroline Budu, David A Gallagher, Jonathan P Bestwick, Anette Schrag, Alastair J Noyce, Cristina Simonet, Noreen Akram, Haoxuan Li, Aaron Ben-Joseph, Caroline Budu, David A Gallagher, Jonathan P Bestwick, Anette Schrag, Alastair J Noyce, Cristina Simonet

Abstract

Disability in Parkinson's disease (PD) is measured by standardised scales including the MDS-UPDRS, which are subject to high inter and intra-rater variability and fail to capture subtle motor impairment. The BRadykinesia Akinesia INcoordination (BRAIN) test is a validated keyboard tapping test, evaluating proximal upper-limb motor impairment. Here, a new Distal Finger Tapping (DFT) test was developed to assess distal upper-limb function. Kinetic parameters of the test include kinesia score (KS20, key taps over 20 s), akinesia time (AT20, mean dwell-time on each key) and incoordination score (IS20, variance of travelling time between key taps). To develop and evaluate a new keyboard-tapping test for objective and remote distal motor function in PD patients. The DFT and BRAIN tests were assessed in 55 PD patients and 65 controls. Test scores were compared between groups and correlated with the MDS-UPDRS-III finger tapping sub-scores. Nine additional PD patients were recruited for monitoring motor fluctuations. All three parameters discriminated effectively between PD patients and controls, with KS20 performing best, yielding 79% sensitivity for 85% specificity; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.90. A combination of DFT and BRAIN tests improved discrimination (AUC = 0.95). Among three parameters, KS20 showed a moderate correlation with the MDS-UPDRS finger-tapping sub-score (Pearson's r = - 0.40, p = 0.002). Further, the DFT test detected subtle changes in motor fluctuation states which were not reflected clearly by the MDS-UPDRS-III finger tapping sub-scores. The DFT test is an online tool for assessing distal movements in PD, with future scope for longitudinal monitoring of motor complications.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the BRAIN test and DFT test. Left: BRAIN test, alternate tapping of the ‘s’ and ‘;’ keys with the index finger and online interface below. Right: DFT test, repeated tapping of down arrow key with left index finger whilst depressing the left arrow key with left middle finger and online interface below.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of KS20, AT20 and IS20 in PD patients and controls. Spread of (a) KS20, (b) AT20 (mean and SD) and (c) IS20 (median and IQR) for patients and controls. Receiver operating curves for (d) KS20, (e) AT20 and (f) IS20.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between DFT parameters and MDS-UPDRS-III finger tapping sub-socres. (a) Moderate negative correlation with KS20 and UPDRS. (b) Moderate positive correlation seen with AT20 and finger tapping sub-score. (c) No correlation seen with IS20 and finger tapping sub-score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Repeat testing in 4 PD patients with predictable motor fluctuations using the DFT and BRAIN test. Dots represent when the test was completed, and arrows denote the time when levodopa was taken. KS20 (DFT test) and KS30 (BRAIN test) scores are expected to increase in the ‘On’ state, whereas AT20 and AT30 scores are expected to decrease in the ‘On’ state.

References

    1. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2002;55:181–184.
    1. Goetz CG, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov/ Disord. 2008;23:2129–2170.
    1. Taylor TA, et al. Quantitative measurements of alternating finger tapping in Parkinson's disease correlate with UPDRS motor disability and reveal the improvement in fine motor control from medication and deep brain stimulation. Mov. Disord. 2005;20(10):1286–1298.
    1. Regnault A, Boroojerdi B, Meunier J, Bani M, Morel T, Cano S. Does the MDS-UPDRS provide the precision to assess progression in early Parkinson's disease? Learnings from the Parkinson's progression marker initiative cohort. J. Neurol. 2019;266(8):1927–1936.
    1. Goetz CG, Stebbins GT. Assuring interrater reliability for the UPDRS motor section: Utility of the UPDRS teaching tape. Mov. Disord. 2004;19(12):1453.
    1. Hasan H, Athauda DS, Foltynie T, Noyce AJ. Technologies assessing limb bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2017;7(1):65–77.
    1. Noyce AJ, et al. Bradykinesia-akinesia incoordination test: Validating an online keyboard test of upper limb function. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e96260.
    1. Khan T, Nyholm D, Westin J, Dougherty M. A computer vision framework for finger-tapping evaluation in Parkinson's disease. Artif. Intell. Med. 2014;60(1):27–40.
    1. Kassavetis P, et al. Developing a tool for remote digital assessment of Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2016;3(1):59–64.
    1. Maetzler W, Ellerbrock M, Heger T, Sass C, Berg D, Reilmann R. Digitomotography in Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123914.
    1. Arora S, Venkataraman V, Zhan A. Detecting and monitoring the symptoms of Parkinson's disease using smartphones: A pilot study. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2015;21(6):650–653.
    1. Sano Y, et al. Quantifying Parkinson’s disease finger-tapping severity by extracting and synthesizing finger motion properties. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2016;54(6):953–965.
    1. Lee CY, Kang SJ, Hong SK, Ma H, Lee U, Kim YJ. A validation study of a smartphone-based finger tapping application for quantitative assessment of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158852.
    1. Ruzicka E, Krupicka R, Zarubova K, Rusz J, Jech R, Szabo Z. Tests of manual dexterity and speed in Parkinson's disease: Not all measure the same. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2016;28:118–123.
    1. Mitsi G, et al. Biometric digital health technology for measuring motor function in Parkinson's disease: Results from a feasibility and patient satisfaction study. Front. Neurol. 2017;8:273.
    1. Van den Noort JC, et al. Quantification of hand motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A proof-of-principle study using inertial and force sensors. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017;45(10):2423–2436.
    1. Gao C, et al. Objective assessment of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease using evolutionary algorithms: Clinical validation. Transl. Neurodegener. 2018;7:18.
    1. Zhan A, et al. Using smartphones and machine learning to quantify Parkinson disease severity: The mobile Parkinson disease score. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(7):876–880.
    1. Lipsmeier F, et al. Evaluation of smartphone-based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson's disease clinical trial. Mov. Disord. 2018;33(8):1287–1297.
    1. Prince J, de Vos M. A deep learning framework for the remote detection of Parkinson's disease using smart-phone sensor data. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018;2018:3144–3147.
    1. Butt AH, et al. Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2018;17(1):168.
    1. Wissel BD, et al. Tablet-based application for objective measurement of motor fluctuations in Parkinson disease. Digit. Biomark. 2018;1(2):126–135.
    1. Lee WL, et al. Objective evaluation of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease using an inexpensive marker-less motion tracking system. Physiol. Meas. 2019;40(1):014004.
    1. Bobić V, Djurić-Jovičić M, Dragašević N, Popović MB, Kostić VS, Kvaščev G. An expert system for quantification of bradykinesia based on wearable inertial sensors. Sensors. 2019;19(11):2644.
    1. Shin JH, et al. Objective measurement of limb bradykinesia using a marker-less tracking algorithm with 2D-video in PD patients. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2020;81:129–135.
    1. Williams S, et al. The discerning eye of computer vision: Can it measure Parkinson's finger tap bradykinesia? J Neurol Sci. 2020;15:416.
    1. Li J, et al. Three-dimensional pattern features in finger tapping test for patients with Parkinson's disease. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2020;2020:3676–3679.
    1. Zhao Z, et al. Time series clustering to examine presence of decrement in Parkinson's finger-tapping bradykinesia. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2020;2020:780–783.
    1. Alberts JL, et al. Use of a smartphone to gather Parkinson's disease neurological vital signs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Parkinsons Dis. 2021;2021:1–7.
    1. Shribman S, Hasan H, Hadavi S, Giovannoni G, Noyce AJ. The BRAIN test: A keyboard-tapping test to assess disability and clinical features of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2018;265(2):285–290.
    1. Takahashi K, Best MD, Huh N, Brown KA, Tobaa AA, Hatsopoulos NG. Encoding of both reaching and grasping kinematics in dorsal and ventral premotor cortices. J. Neurosci. 2017;37(7):1733–1746.
    1. Fattori P, Breveglieri R, Raos V, Bosco A, Galletti C. Vision for action in the macaque medial posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2012;32(9):3221–3234.
    1. Hasan H, et al. The BRadykinesia Akinesia INcoordination (BRAIN) tap test: Capturing the sequence effect. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2019;6(6):462–469.
    1. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
    1. Weiss PH, Dafotakis M, Metten L, Noth J. Distal and proximal prehension is differentially affected by Parkinson's disease. The effect of conscious and subconscious load cues. J. Neurol. 2009;256(3):450–456.
    1. Dafotakis M, Fink GR, Allert N, Nowak DA. The impact of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on bradykinesia of proximal and distal upper limb muscles in Parkinson's disease. J. Neurol. 2008;255(3):429–437.
    1. Fellows SJ, Noth J. Grip force abnormalities in de novo Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 2004;19(5):560–565.
    1. Delong MR, Georgopoulos AP, Crutcher MD, Mitchell SJ, Richardson RT, Alexander GE. Functional organization of the basal ganglia: Contributions of single-cell recording studies. Ciba Found Symp. 1984;107:64–82.
    1. Potter-Nerger M, Wenzelburger R, Deuschl G, Volkmann J. Impact of subthalamic stimulation and medication on proximal and distal bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease. Eur. Neurol. 2009;62(2):114–119.
    1. Schlesinger I, Erikh I, Yarnitsky D. Paradoxical kinesia at war. Mov. Disord. 2007;22(16):2394–2397.
    1. Cilia R, et al. Natural history of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and the long-duration response to levodopa. Brain. 2020;143(8):2490–2501.
    1. Noyce AJ, et al. PREDICT-PD: Identifying risk of Parkinson's disease in the community: methods and baseline results. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2014;85(1):31–37.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever