Needs, Priorities, and Recommendations for Engaging Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Research: A Community Perspective

Jennifer Cunningham Erves, Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble, Alecia Malin-Fair, Alaina Boyer, Yvonne Joosten, Yolanda C Vaughn, Lisa Sherden, Patrick Luther, Stephania Miller, Consuelo H Wilkins, Jennifer Cunningham Erves, Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble, Alecia Malin-Fair, Alaina Boyer, Yvonne Joosten, Yolanda C Vaughn, Lisa Sherden, Patrick Luther, Stephania Miller, Consuelo H Wilkins

Abstract

Engaging underrepresented groups in outcomes research is a public health priority for reducing health and health care disparities; yet, engaging these groups is challenging. Failure to involve these underrepresented populations in research further exacerbates these disparities. This article presents the health and research priorities of diverse groups of underrepresented populations in biomedical research, their concerns for participating in research, and strategies to engage them in their healthcare and research studies. Eleven community listening sessions, ranging from 7 to 13 community members each (N = 117), representing racial/ethnic minority, economically disadvantaged (e.g., uninsured), and hearing impaired communities. We used an inductive, qualitative content analysis approach to analyze the data for emerging themes. We identified the following themes: Uncertainties of underrepresented populations regarding research participation; Ineffective communication about research opportunities and research findings; Research on primary care and prevention are priorities for underrepresented populations in research; and Research teams need training in cultural competence and humility. Underrepresented groups provided research priorities, concerns, and strategies to engage them in their healthcare and in research studies. Findings from this study could facilitate improvement of research participation among underrepresented groups, ultimately reducing health disparities and improving quality of life among groups commonly omitted from research recruitment and participation.

Keywords: Community engagement; Health and healthcare disparities; Research studies; Underrepresented populations.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Adams-Campbell, L. L., Ahaghotu, C., Gaskins, M., et al. (2004). Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: study design barriers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22. doi:10.1200/jco.2004.03.160.
    1. Allison KR, Rottman I. Scientific rigor and community participation in health promotion research: are they compatible? Health Promotion International. 1996;2(4):333–340. doi: 10.1093/heapro/11.4.333.
    1. Baird KL. The new NIH and FDA medical research policies: targeting gender, promoting justice. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1999;24(3):531–565. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-3-531.
    1. Baldwin DM. Disparities in health and health care: focusing efforts to eliminate unequal burdens. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2003;8(1):2.
    1. Belknap RA, Vandevusse L. Listening sessions with Latinas: documenting life contexts and creating connections. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.) 2010;27(4):337–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00864.x.
    1. Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul, et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1):1–29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
    1. Bridges. (2016). Bridges: Serving the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Communities. Retrieved April 7, 2013, from .
    1. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement (2011). Principles of Community Engagement. Retrieved April 4, 2016, from .
    1. Congress US. National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993: Act to Amend the Public Health Service Act to Revise and Extend the Programs of the National Institutes of Health, and for Other Purposes. Washington, D.C: Public Law Washington; 1993.
    1. Conway T, Hu TC, Harrington T. Setting health priorities: community boards accurately reflect the preferences of the community’s residents. Journal of Community Health. 1997;22(1):57–68. doi: 10.1023/A:1025198924501.
    1. Downs TJ, Larson HJ. Achieving Millennium Development Goals for health: building understanding, trust and capacity to respond. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2007;83(2–3):144–161. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.008.
    1. Fisher JA, Kalbaugh CA. Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101(12):2217–2222. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279.
    1. Fouad MN, Johnson RE, Nagy MC, Person SD, Partridge EE. Adherence and retention in clinical trials: a community-based approach. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1106–1112. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28572.
    1. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104:e16–e31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706.
    1. Giuliano AR, Mokuau N, Hughes C, et al. Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural and linguistic factors. AEP. 2000;10:S22–S34.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub Co; 1967.
    1. Goldberg-Freeman C, Kass NE, Tracey P, et al. “You’ve got to understand community”: community perceptions on “breaking the disconnect” between researchers and communities. Progress in Community Health Partnerships. 2007;1(3):231–240. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0021.
    1. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. Johnson DA, Joosten YA, Wilkins CH, Shibao CA. Case study: Community engagement and clinical trial success: Outreach to African American women. Clinical and Translational Science. 2015;8(4):388–390. doi: 10.1111/cts.12264.
    1. Kauffman KS, Dosreis S, Ross M, Barnet B, Onukwugha E, Mullins CD. Engaging hard-to-reach patients in patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2013;2(3):313–324. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.11.
    1. Killien M, Bigby JA, Champion V, et al. Involving minority and underrepresented women in clinical trials: the National Centers of Excellence in Women’s Health. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 2000;9(10):1061–1070. doi: 10.1089/152460900445974.
    1. Koniak-Griffin D, Brecht ML, Takayanagi S, Villegas J, Melendrez M, Balcazar H. A community health worker-led lifestyle behavior intervention for Latina (Hispanic) women: feasibility and outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52(1):75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.005.
    1. Locock L, Smith L. Personal experiences in taking part in clinical trials: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling. 2011;84:303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.002.
    1. Locock L, Smith L. Personal benefit, or benefiting others? Deciding whether to take part in clinical trials. Clinical Trials (London, England) 2011;8(1):85–93. doi: 10.1177/1740774510392257.
    1. National Institute of Health. (2015). 2015 Research Highlights-Promising Medical Advances. Retrieved April 11, 2016, from .
    1. Oh SS, Galanter J, Thakur N, et al. Diversity in clinical and biomedical research: A promise yet to be fulfilled. PLoS Medicine. 2015;12(12):e1001918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001918.
    1. Schlling J. On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2006;22(1):28–37. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28.
    1. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Jr., Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289(10):1278–1287. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.
    1. Swanson, G. M., & Ward, A. J. (1995). Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87. doi:10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747.
    1. University of Kansas Work Group for Community Health and Development (2015). Community Tool Box: Community Assessment. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from .
    1. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Heathy People 2020. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from .
    1. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice. 2006;7(3):312–323. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289376.
    1. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(1):S40–S46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever