Exploring interpersonal and environmental factors of autistic adolescents' peer engagement in integrated education

Yu-Lun Chen, Maxwell Schneider, Kristie Patten, Yu-Lun Chen, Maxwell Schneider, Kristie Patten

Abstract

Peer engagement is essential but often challenging for autistic students in integrated education, especially for adolescents. Although peer engagement is bidirectional and context-dependent, research has largely focused on individual characteristics rather than the interpersonal and environmental factors affecting peer engagement. This mixed-methods study examined peer interactions over a school year among 17 adolescents (seven were autistic) in an inclusive school club at a public middle school in the Northeastern United States. The study began with a quantitative phase identifying sessions in which each student was socially engaged with peers more or less often than usual for them. We then qualitatively compared the social interactions and contexts between sessions where each participant experienced high and low peer engagement. Thematic analysis revealed four themes regarding contextual supports and barriers to autistic peer engagement: (1) peer engagement is a participatory process where a student and their peer(s) navigate mutual understanding, shaped by both student and peer social characteristics, openness, and involvement; (2) student-peer synchronicity, such as shared interests or compatibility of social styles, was essential to autistic peer engagement; (3) peer engagement can be supported by activities facilitating joint engagement and exploration of mutual interests; (4) classroom interventions emphasizing strengths can support peer engagement, while normative behavioral standards without peer education on individual differences and diversity can perpetuate peers' negative perceptions of autistic difficulties. The findings have implications for better inclusive practice to support autistic social participation by modifying the peer environments, activities, and classroom interventions.

Keywords: adolescents; double empathy problem; education services; environmental factors; inclusion; inclusive education; interpersonal factors; peer engagement; social cognition and social behavior; social participation.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Anderson A., Moore D. W., Godfrey R., Fletcher-Flinn C. M. (2004). Social skills assessment of children with autism in free-play situations. Autism, 8(4), 369–385. 10.1177/1362361304045216
    1. Bolis D., Balsters J., Wenderoth N., Becchio C., Schilbach L. (2017). Beyond autism: Introducing the dialectical misattunement hypothesis and a Bayesian account of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 50(6), 355–372. 10.1159/000484353
    1. Bottema-Beutel K., Mullins T. S., Harvey M. N., Gustafson J. R., Carter E. W. (2016). Avoiding the “brick wall of awkward”: Perspectives of youth with autism spectrum disorder on social-focused intervention practices. Autism, 20(2), 196–206. 10.1177/1362361315574888
    1. Boyd B. A., Conroy M. A., Asmus J. M., McKenney E. L. W., Mancil G. R. (2008). Descriptive analysis of classroom setting events on the social behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(2), 186–197.
    1. Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Campbell J. M., Morton J. F., Roulston K., Barger B. D. (2011). A descriptive analysis of middle school students’ conceptions of autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23(5), 377–397. 10.1007/s10882-011-9234-4
    1. Chang Y. C., Shih W., Kasari C. (2016). Friendships in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder: What holds them back, child characteristics or teacher behavior? Autism, 20(1), 65–74. 10.1177/1362361314567761
    1. Chen Y.-L. (2021). Contextualizing participation: Examining peer engagement of adolescents on the autism spectrum in inclusive education using mixed-methods observations. Department of Occupational Therapy, New York University.
    1. Chen Y.-L., Murthi K., Martin W., Vidiksis R., Riccio A., Patten K. (2021). Experiences of students, teachers, and parents participating in an inclusive, school-based informal engineering education program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s10803-021-05230-2
    1. Chen Y.-L., Senande L. L., Thorsen M., Patten K. (2021). Peer preferences and characteristics of same-group and cross-group social interactions among autistic and non-autistic adolescents. Autism, 25(7), 1885–1900. 10.1177/13623613211005918
    1. Crenshaw K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241.
    1. Cresswell L., Hinch R., Cage E. (2019). The experiences of peer relationships amongst autistic adolescents: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 45–60. 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.01.003
    1. Crompton C. J., Hallett S., Ropar D., Flynn E., Fletcher-Watson S. (2020). ‘I never realised everybody felt as happy as i do when i am around autistic people’: A thematic analysis of autistic adults’ relationships with autistic and neurotypical friends and family. Autism, 24(6), 1438–1448. 10.1177/1362361320908976
    1. Crompton C. J., Ropar D., Evans-Williams C. V., Flynn E. G., Fletcher-Watson S. (2020). Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective. Autism, 24(7), 1704–1712. 10.1177/1362361320919286
    1. Crompton C. J., Sharp M., Axbey H., Fletcher-Watson S., Flynn E. G., Ropar D. (2020). Neurotype-matching, but not being autistic, influences self and observer ratings of interpersonal rapport. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 586171. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171
    1. De Jaegher H. (2013). Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, Article 15. 10.3389/fnint.2013.00015
    1. den Houting J. (2019). Neurodiversity: An insider’s perspective. Autism, 23(2), 271–273. 10.1177/1362361318820762
    1. Engeström Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Orienta-konsultit.
    1. Engeström Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Punamäki R.-L., Miettinen R., Engeström Y. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
    1. Foot K. A. (2014). Cultural-historical activity theory: Exploring a theory to inform practice and research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 329–347. 10.1080/10911359.2013.831011
    1. Hedley D., Uljarević M., Wilmot M., Richdale A., Dissanayake C. (2018). Understanding depression and thoughts of self-harm in autism: A potential mechanism involving loneliness. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 46, 1–7. 10.1016/j.rasd.2017.11.003
    1. Hollingsworth H. L., Buysse V. (2009). Establishing friendships in early childhood inclusive settings: What roles do parents and teachers play? Journal of Early Intervention, 31(4), 287–307. 10.1177/1053815109352659
    1. Humphrey N., Symes W. (2010). Perceptions of social support and experience of bullying among pupils with autistic spectrum disorders in mainstream secondary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(1), 77–91. 10.1080/08856250903450855
    1. Humphrey N., Symes W. (2011). Peer interaction patterns among adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders (ASDs) in mainstream school settings. Autism, 15(4), 397–419. 10.1177/1362361310387804
    1. Jaswal V. K., Akhtar N. (2018). Being vs. Appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, Article e82. 10.1017/S0140525X18001826
    1. Koegel L., Vernon T., Koegel R., Koegel B., Paullin A. (2012). Improving social engagement and initiations between children with autism spectrum disorder and their peers in inclusive settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 220–227. 10.1177/1098300712437042
    1. Koegel R., Fredeen R., Kim S., Danial J., Rubinstein D., Koegel L. (2012). Using perseverative interests to improve interactions between adolescents with autism and their typical peers in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(3), 133–141. 10.1177/1098300712437043
    1. Kuo M. H., Orsmond G. I., Cohn E. S., Coster W. J. (2013). Friendship characteristics and activity patterns of adolescents with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 17(4), 481–500. 10.1177/1362361311416380
    1. Lindsay S., Proulx M., Scott H., Thomson N. (2013). Exploring teachers’ strategies for including children with autism spectrum disorder in mainstream classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(2), 101–122. 10.1080/13603116.2012.758320
    1. Locke J., Shih W., Kretzmann M., Kasari C. (2016). Examining playground engagement between elementary school children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(6), 653–662. 10.1177/1362361315599468
    1. Long E., Zucca C., Sweeting H. (2020). School climate, peer relationships, and adolescent mental health: A social ecological perspective. Youth & Society. Advance online publication. 10.1177/0044118x20970232
    1. Maiano C., Normand C. L., Salvas M. C., Moullec G., Aime A. (2016). Prevalence of school bullying among youth with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Research, 9(6), 601–615. 10.1002/aur.1568
    1. Martin W., Vidiksis R., Koenig K. P., Chen Y.-L. (2019). Making on and off the spectrum. Connected Science Learning, 1(10).
    1. Martin W. B., Yu J., Wei X., Vidiksis R., Patten K. K., Riccio A. (2020). Promoting science, technology, and engineering self-efficacy and knowledge for all with an autism inclusion maker program. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 75. 10.3389/feduc.2020.00075
    1. Mazurek M. O. (2014). Loneliness, friendship, and well-being in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 18(3), 223–232. 10.1177/1362361312474121
    1. Milton D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The “double empathy problem.” Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887. 10.1080/09687599.2012.710008
    1. Milton D. E. M., Heasman B., Sheppard E. (2020). Double empathy. In Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 1–9). 10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102273-2
    1. Morrison K. E., DeBrabander K. M., Faso D. J., Sasson N. J. (2019). Variability in first impressions of autistic adults made by neurotypical raters is driven more by characteristics of the rater than by characteristics of autistic adults. Autism, 23(7), 1817–1829. 10.1177/1362361318824104
    1. Morrison K. E., DeBrabander K. M., Jones D. R., Ackerman R. A., Sasson N. J. (2020). Social cognition, social skill, and social motivation minimally predict social interaction outcomes for autistic and non-autistic adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 591100. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591100
    1. Morrison K. E., DeBrabander K. M., Jones D. R., Faso D. J., Ackerman R. A., Sasson N. J. (2020). Outcomes of real-world social interaction for autistic adults paired with autistic compared to typically developing partners. Autism, 24(5), 1067–1080. 10.1177/1362361319892701
    1. Muller E., Schuler A., Yates G. B. (2008). Social challenges and supports from the perspective of individuals with Asperger syndrome and other autism spectrum disabilities. Autism, 12(2), 173–190. 10.1177/1362361307086664
    1. O’Hagan S., Hebron J. (2016). Perceptions of friendship among adolescents with autism spectrum conditions in a mainstream high school resource provision. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 314–328. 10.1080/08856257.2016.1223441
    1. Patalay P., Fitzsimons E. (2016). Correlates of mental illness and wellbeing in children: Are they the same? Results from the UK millennium cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(9), 771–783. 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.019
    1. Reszka S. S., Odom S. L., Hume K. A. (2012). Ecological features of preschools and the social engagement of children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 34(1), 40–56. 10.1177/1053815112452596
    1. Roach A. (2018). Supportive peer relationships and mental health in adolescence: An integrative review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(9), 723–737. 10.1080/01612840.2018.1496498
    1. Sasson N. J., Faso D. J., Nugent J., Lovell S., Kennedy D. P., Grossman R. B. (2017). Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 40700. 10.1038/srep40700
    1. Singer J. (1999). Why can’t you be normal for once in your life? From a problem with no name to the emergence of a new category of difference. In Corker M., French S. (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 59–70). Open University Press.
    1. Swaim K. F., Morgan S. B. (2001). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer with autistic behaviors: Does a brief educational intervention have an effect? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(2), 195–205. 10.1023/A:1010703316365
    1. Tierney S., Burns J., Kilbey E. (2016). Looking behind the mask: Social coping strategies of girls on the autistic spectrum. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 73–83. 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.013
    1. U.S. Department of Education. (2018. –2019). Idea section 618 data products: Static tables: Number and percent of students ages 6 through 21 served under idea, part b, by educational environment and state.
    1. Williams E. I., Gleeson K., Jones B. E. (2019). How pupils on the autism spectrum make sense of themselves in the context of their experiences in a mainstream school setting: A qualitative metasynthesis. Autism, 23(1), 8–28. 10.1177/1362361317723836

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever