Anatomical basis of a safe mini-invasive technique for lengthening of the anterior gastrocnemius aponeurosis

Simone Moroni, Alejandro Fernández-Gibello, Gabriel Camunas Nieves, Ruben Montes, Marit Zwierzina, Teresa Vazquez, Maria Garcia-Escudero, Fabrice Duparc, Bernhard Moriggl, Marko Konschake, Simone Moroni, Alejandro Fernández-Gibello, Gabriel Camunas Nieves, Ruben Montes, Marit Zwierzina, Teresa Vazquez, Maria Garcia-Escudero, Fabrice Duparc, Bernhard Moriggl, Marko Konschake

Abstract

Background: The surgical procedure itself of lengthening the gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis is performed to treat multiple musculoskeletal, neurological and metabolical pathologies related to a gastro-soleus unit contracture such as plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinopathy, metatarsalgia, cerebral palsy, or diabetic foot ulcerations. Therefore, the aim of our research was to prove the effectiveness and safety of a new ultrasound-guided surgery-technique for the lengthening of the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis, the "GIAR"- technique: the gastrocnemius-intramuscular aponeurosis release.

Methods and results: An ultrasound-guided surgical GIAR on ten fresh-frozen specimens (10 donors, 8 male, 2 females, 5 left and 5 right) was performed. Exclusion criteria of the donated bodies to science were BMI above 35 (impaired ultrasound echogenicity), signs of traumas in the ankle and crural region, a history of ankle or foot ischemic vascular disorder, surgery or space-occupying mass lesions. The surgical procedures were performed by two podiatric surgeons with more than 6 years of experience in ultrasound-guided procedures. The anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis was entirely transected in 10 over 10 specimens, with a mean portal length of 2 mm (± 1 mm). The mean gain at the ankle joint ROM after the GIAR was 7.9° (± 1.1°). No damages of important anatomical structures could be found.

Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that our novel ultrasound-guided surgery for the lengthening of the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis (GIAR) might be an effective and safe procedure.

Keywords: Aponeurosis; Gastrocnemius muscle; Minimally invasive; Ultrasound.

Conflict of interest statement

No outside funding was received. Nothing to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Instruments for the minimally invasive ultrasound-guided procedure. High-resolution ultrasound; 18-gauge needle; 50 cc syringe; V-shape straight curette; hook knife (Acufex®), analogic goniometer, surgical pen
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a, b US-guided pre-surgical mapping for ultrasound-guided GIAR. a (yellow line)… mapping of the course of saphenous nerve along the crural region; (Blue line)…mapping of the course of great saphenous vein along the crural region; (white asterisk)…the needle is inserted through the surgical portal immediately dorsal to the course of the great saphenous vein, superficial at the interval between the anterior gastrocnemius aponeurosis and the soleus muscle. b (white dotted lines)…gastrocnemius muscle bellies representation at the dorsal aspect of the crural region. (white asterisk)…the hook knifes, ventral one introduced through the surgical portal at the interval between the soleus and gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis (up to the most lateral aspect), the other one positioned at the dorsal aspect of the skin of the crural region as a demonstration for the correct positioning of the first one. (Red dot)… represents the distal transection point. (green dotted line)…represents the transection at the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis (color figure online)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ad US-guided surgical routine for GIAR. 3a (needle)…18 g needle seen through an in-plane approach in the long axis hydrodissecting proximal to the conjoint tendon, the virtual anatomical space in between the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis, ventrally to both gastrocnemius heads from medial to lateral and the soleus aponeurosis and its underlying muscle belly (SM) dorsally, both seen in the short axis. b from the medial portal, it could be seen the V shape straight courette (V-shape) dorsal to the 18 g needle (needle) both seen through an in-plane approach in the long axis at the hydrodissected interval in between the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis and the medial head of its muscle belly (GM) and soleus aponeurosis and its underlying muscle belly (SM) both seen in the short axis. c from the medial portal, it can be seen the hook knife through an in plane approach in the long axis at the hydrodissected interval in between the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis and medial head of its muscle belly (GM) and the soleus aponeurosis and its underlying muscle belly (SM) both seen in the short axis. d After hook knife transection it can be seen the gap at the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis (AGMA) and the buttoned probe in between the gap through an out of plane approach in the short axis at the hydrodissected interval in between the anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis and medial head of its muscle belly (GM) and soleus aponeurosis and its underlying muscle belly (SM) both seen in the long axis (color figure online)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a, b Anatomical dissections for proof after US-guided GIAR technique. a (AGMA)… transected anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis; (PT)… transected plantaris tendon. b (AGMA)… transected anterior gastrocnemius muscle aponeurosis; (PT)… transected plantaris tendon; (GIAR)… gastrocnemius intramuscular aponeurosis recession; (CF)… crural fascia; (SN)… preserved sural nerve; (GSV)… great saphenous vein.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a, b The gain at the ankle joint range-of-motion (ROM) after our US-guided GIAR-technique. (black lines)…the line drawn on the distal crural region marks the shaft of the fibular bone, the black line drawn on the foot marks the shaft of the fifth metatarsal bone; a pre-surgery, clinical evaluation for equinus deformity due to gastrocemius muscle contracture. b post-surgery, one can see the gain in extension range of motion at the ankle joint (color figure online)

References

    1. Adelman VR, Szczepanski JA, Adelman RP, Lincoln DR. Endoscopic gastrocnemius recession ultrasound-guided analysis of length gained. Tech Foot and Ankle Surg. 2009;8:24–29. doi: 10.1097/BTF.0b013e318199986b.
    1. Anderson JG, Bohay DR, Eller EB, Witt BL. Gastrocnemius recession. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014;19:767–786. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.09.001.
    1. Baker LD. A rational approach to the surgical needs of the cerebral palsy patient. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-A:313–323. doi: 10.2106/00004623-195638020-00007.
    1. Barrett SL, Jarvis J. Equinus deformity as a factor in forefoot nerve entrapment: treatment with endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:464–468. doi: 10.7547/0950464.
    1. Barske HL, DiGiovanni BF, Douglass M, Nawoczenski DA. Current concepts review: isolated gastrocnemius contracture and gastrocnemius recession. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:915–921. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0915.
    1. Baumann JU, Koch HG. Ventrale aponeurotische Verlängerung des Musculus gastrocnemius. Oper Orthopädie und Traumatol. 1989;1:254–258. doi: 10.1007/BF02514828.
    1. Blitz NM, Eliot DJ. Anatomical aspects of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis and its insertion: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:101–108. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.11.003.
    1. Blitz NM, Eliot DJ. Anatomical aspects of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis and its muscular bound portion: a cadaveric study-part II. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;47:533–540. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2008.08.006.
    1. Cychosz CC, Phisitkul P, Belatti DA, Glazebrook MA, DiGiovanni CW. Gastrocnemius recession for foot and ankle conditions in adults: evidence-based recommendations. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;21:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.02.001.
    1. Dalmau-Pastor M, Fargues-Polo B, Jr, Casanova-Martinez D, Jr, Vega J, Golano P. Anatomy of the triceps surae: a pictorial essay. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014;19:603–635. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.08.002.
    1. Daseler EH, Anson BJ. The plantaris muscle: an anatomical study of 750 specimens. JBJS. 1943;25:822–827.
    1. DeHeer PA. Equinus and Lengthening Techniques. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2017;34:207–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2016.10.008.
    1. Fernandez-Gibello A, Moroni S, Camunas G, Montes R, Zwierzina M, Tasch C, Starke V, Sanudo J, Vazquez T, Konschake M. Ultrasound-guided decompression surgery of the tarsal tunnel: a novel technique for the proximal tarsal tunnel syndrome-Part II. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41:43–51. doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2127-9.
    1. Grady JF, Kelly C. Endoscopic gastrocnemius recession for treating equinus in pediatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1033–1038. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1084-3.
    1. Herzenberg JE, Lamm BM, Corwin C, Sekel J. Isolated recession of the gastrocnemius muscle: the Baumann procedure. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:1154–1159. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.1154.
    1. Konschake M, Brenner E. "Mors auxilium vitae"–causes of death of body donors in an Austrian anatomical department. Ann Anat. 2014;196:387–393. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2014.07.002.
    1. Krause DA, Cloud BA, Forster LA, Schrank JA, Hollman JH. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: a comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20:333–344. doi: 10.1123/jsr.20.3.333.
    1. Lamm BM, Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Gastrocnemius soleus recession: a simpler, more limited approach. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:18–25. doi: 10.7547/0950018.
    1. Lui TH. Endoscopic gastrocnemius intramuscular aponeurotic recession. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4:e615–618. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.011.
    1. McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu AR, Drukker J, van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud MM. The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe-A review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Euro J Anatomy. 2020;12:1–24.
    1. Moroni S, Gibello AF, Zwierzina M, Nieves GC, Montes R, Sanudo J, Vazquez T, Konschake M. Ultrasound-guided decompression surgery of the distal tarsal tunnel: a novel technique for the distal tarsal tunnel syndrome-part III. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41:313–321. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02196-w.
    1. Moroni S, Zwierzina M, Starke V, Moriggl B, Montesi F, Konschake M. Clinical-anatomic mapping of the tarsal tunnel with regard to Baxter's neuropathy in recalcitrant heel pain syndrome: part I. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41:29–41. doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2124-z.
    1. Rodriguez-Acevedo O, Elstner K, Zea A, Diaz J, Martinic K, Ibrahim N. The sural nerve: Sonographic anatomy, variability and relation to the small saphenous vein in the setting of endovenous thermal ablation. Phlebology. 2017;32:49–54. doi: 10.1177/0268355515627262.
    1. Rong K, Ge W-t, Li X-c, Xu X-y. Mid-term results of intramuscular lengthening of gastrocnemius and/or soleus to correct equinus deformity in flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:1223–1228. doi: 10.1177/1071100715588994.
    1. Rong K, Li XC, Ge WT, Xu Y, Xu XY. Comparison of the efficacy of three isolated gastrocnemius recession procedures in a cadaveric model of gastrocnemius tightness. Int Orthop. 2016;40:417–423. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2860-1.
    1. Saraph V, Zwick EB, Uitz C, Linhart W, Steinwender G. The Baumann procedure for fixed contracture of the gastrosoleus in cerebral palsy. Evaluation of function of the ankle after multilevel surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:535–540. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b4.9850.
    1. Strayer LM., Jr Recession of the gastrocnemius: an operation to relieve spastic contracture of the calf muscles. JBJS. 1950;32:671–676. doi: 10.2106/00004623-195032030-00022.
    1. Tan ACK, Tang ZH, Fadil MFBM. Cadaveric anatomical study of sural nerve: where is the safe area for endoscopic gastrocnemius recession? Open Orthopaedics J. 2017;11:1094. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011094.
    1. Tashjian RZ, Appel AJ, Banerjee R, DiGiovanni CW. Endoscopic gastrocnemius recession: evaluation in a cadaver model. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:607–613. doi: 10.1177/107110070302400807.
    1. Thevendran G, Howe LB, Kaliyaperumal K, Fang C. Endoscopic gastrocnemius recession procedure using a single portal technique: a prospective study of fifty four consecutive patients. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1099–1107. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2723-9.
    1. Villanueva M, Iborra A, Rodriguez G, Sanz-Ruiz P. Ultrasound-guided gastrocnemius recession: a new ultra-minimally invasive surgical technique. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:409. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1265-7.
    1. Vohra PK, Japour CJ. Ultrasound-guided plantar fascia release technique: a retrospective study of 46 feet. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009;99:183–190. doi: 10.7547/0980183.
    1. Vulpius O, Stoffel A (1913) Orthopadische Operationslehre: Mit 627 zum Teil farbigen Abbildungen. F. Enke

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever