Signs and symptoms of acromegaly at diagnosis: the physician's and the patient's perspectives in the ACRO-POLIS study

Philippe Caron, Thierry Brue, Gérald Raverot, Antoine Tabarin, Anne Cailleux, Brigitte Delemer, Peggy Pierre Renoult, Aude Houchard, Fatine Elaraki, Philippe Chanson, Philippe Caron, Thierry Brue, Gérald Raverot, Antoine Tabarin, Anne Cailleux, Brigitte Delemer, Peggy Pierre Renoult, Aude Houchard, Fatine Elaraki, Philippe Chanson

Abstract

Purpose: Acromegaly is characterized by a broad range of manifestations. Early diagnosis is key to treatment success, but is often delayed as symptomatology overlaps with common disorders. We investigated sign-and-symptom associations, demographics, and clinical characteristics at acromegaly diagnosis.

Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter non-interventional study conducted at 25 hospital departments in France that treat acromegaly (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02012127). Adults diagnosed with acromegaly < 5 years were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from medical reports and patient questionnaires. Sign-and-symptom associations were assessed by multiple correspondence analysis (MCA).

Results: Overall, 472 patients were included in the analyses. MCA was unsuccessful in identifying sign-and-symptom associations at diagnosis. Endocrinologists (29.5% patients) and other clinical specialists (37.2% patients) were commonly first to suspect acromegaly. Morphologic manifestations (83.7-87.9% patients), snoring syndrome (81.4% patients), and asthenia (79.2% patients) were frequently present at diagnosis; differences were found between sexes for specific manifestations. Rates of discrepancy between patient- and physician-reported manifestations were highest for functional signs. Earliest manifestations prior to diagnosis, according to how they were detected, were enlarged hands and feet (6.4 ± 6.8 and 6.2 ± 6.9 years, functional signs), hypertension (6.6 ± 7.5 years, complementary examination) and carpal/cubital tunnel syndrome (5.7 ± 6.7 years, functional signs with complementary examination).

Conclusions: Results confirm the broad range of manifestations at diagnosis and delay in recognizing the disease. We identified early manifestations and sex differences that may aid physicians in diagnosing acromegaly. Discrepancy rates suggest physicians should obtain the patient's perspective and seek functional signs during diagnosis.

Keywords: Acromegaly; Diagnosis; Multiple correspondence analysis; Sign-and-symptom association.

Conflict of interest statement

P.C. is a consultant and speaker for Ipsen, Novartis and Pfizer, and an advisory board member for Ipsen. T.B. has received institutional research support from Novo-Nordisk, Sandoz and Pfizer, consultancy or lectureship fees from Ipsen, Novartis, Strongbridge, and Pfizer, and has served as investigator for clinical trials funded by Novartis, Ipsen and Strongbridge. G.R. has received research grants from Ipsen and Novartis; has served as investigator (principal or coordinator) for clinical trials funded by Novartis and Ipsen, and is a member of Advisory Boards for Ipsen and Novartis. A.T. is a consultant for Ipsen, Novartis, and HRA Pharma and has received lecture fees from Novartis, HRA Pharma and Pfizer. A.C. has no financial disclosures. B.D. has received unrestricted research grants from Pfizer and Novartis, and has served as investigator for clinical trials funded by Novartis, Ipsen and Pfizer. B.D. is a member of advisory board for Ipsen, Novartis and Pfizer and has given lectures for Ipsen, Novartis and Pfizer. PPR has served as coinvestigator for clinical trials funded by Pfizer and Ipsen. A.H. is an employee of Ipsen. F.E. is an employee of Ipsen. P.C. has received unrestricted research and educational grants from Ipsen, Novartis, and Pfizer as Head of the Department of Endocrinology and Reproductive Diseases, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud. P.C. has served as investigator (principal or coordinator) for clinical trials funded by Novartis, Pfizer, Ipsen, Italfarmaco, and Antisense Therapeutics. P.C. is a member of Advisory Boards for Ipsen and Novartis. P.C. has given lectures for Ipsen, Novartis, and Pfizer. All fees and honoraria are paid to his Institution.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency of symptoms and comorbidities at diagnosis of acromegaly (analysis population; secondary endpoint) with sex differences. Bars represent the percentage of patients with each manifestation. Error bars represent 95% CI. CI confidence intervals, CRF case report form. #Re-classified manifestation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Discrepancies between manifestations reported in the CRF versus the patient questionnaire at time of acromegaly diagnosis (analysis population; post hoc analysis), b frequency of mode of manifestation reporting at acromegaly diagnosis (patient questionnaire only versus the CRF only) (analysis population). *N = 472 except amenorrhea or spaniomenorrhea n = 269; galactorrhea n = 270; gynecomastia n = 202; hirsutism and/or acne n = 270. †Amenorrhea or spaniomenorrhea, galactorrhea; and hirsutism and/or acne are displayed as % of women; gynecomastia is displayed as % of men. For % patients with discrepancy, a discrepancy is defined as a sign or comorbidity reported in either the CRF or patient questionnaire, but not both. CE comorbidities diagnosed based on complementary examinations; CRF case report form, FS functional signs (detected after patients report the manifestation, or after clinical examination); FS + CE, symptoms or comorbidities diagnosed on functional signs and confirmed by complementary examinations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Occurrence of manifestations at timeframes prior to diagnosis (analysis population; post hoc analysis) reported by patients. *Amenorrhea or spaniomenorrhea, galactorrhea; and hirsutism increase and/or acne are displayed as % of female patients only gynecomastia are displayed as % of male patients only). Signs, symptoms and comorbidities prelisted in the CRF and in the patient questionnaire that were reported by patients are described at timeframes before the diagnosis of acromegaly. Results for frequency of manifestations at timeframes prior to diagnosis are n = 472 except for amenorrhea or spaniomenorrhea, galactorrhea, hirsutism increase and/or acne (n = 270); and gynecomastia (n = 202). CE comorbidities diagnosed based on complementary examinations, CRF case report form, FS functional signs (detected after patients report the manifestation, or after clinical examination); FS + CE, symptoms or comorbidities diagnosed on functional signs and confirmed by complementary examinations; SD standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean time prior to diagnosis (years) between the detection of early acromegaly manifestations and diagnosis in men and women (analysis population; post hoc analysis). Bars represent the mean number of years prior to acromegaly diagnosis. Error bars represent 95% CI. *Represents statistical significance vs. women. CI confidence intervals

References

    1. Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya C. Epidemiology of acromegaly. Pituitary. 1999;2:29–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1009965803750.
    1. Lugo G, Pena L, Cordido F. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of acromegaly. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2012;2012:540398. doi: 10.1155/2012/540398.
    1. Chanson P, Salenave S, Kamenicky P. Acromegaly. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014;124:197–219. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59602-4.00014-9.
    1. Capatina C, Wass JA. 60 years of neuroendocrinology: acromegaly. J. Endocrinol. 2015;226:T141–T160. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0109.
    1. Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Vandenbroucke JP. Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:61–67. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1191.
    1. Holdaway IM, Bolland MJ, Gamble GD. A meta-analysis of the effect of lowering serum levels of GH and IGF-I on mortality in acromegaly. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2008;159:89–95. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0267.
    1. Clemmons DR, Chihara K, Freda PU, Ho KK, Klibanski A, Melmed S, Shalet SM, Strasburger CJ, Trainer PJ, Thorner MO. Optimizing control of acromegaly: integrating a growth hormone receptor antagonist into the treatment algorithm. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;88:4759–4767. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030518.
    1. Mestron A, Webb SM, Astorga R, Benito P, Catala M, Gaztambide S, Gomez JM, Halperin I, Lucas-Morante T, Moreno B, Obiols G, de PP, Paramo C, Pico A, Torres E, Varela C, Vazquez JA, Zamora J, Albareda M, Gilabert M. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (Registro Espanol de Acromegalia, REA) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2004;151:439–446. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1510439.
    1. Gordon DA, Hill FM, Ezrin C. Acromegaly: a review of 100 cases. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1962;87:1106–1109.
    1. Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, Ross WM, Wilkinson R. Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.). 1980;12:71–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1980.tb03135.x.
    1. Nabarro JD. Acromegaly. Clin. Endocrinol. 1987;26:481–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb00805.x.
    1. Bengtsson BA, Eden S, Ernest I, Oden A, Sjogren B. Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. A study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984. Acta Med. Scand. 1988;223:327–335. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1988.tb15881.x.
    1. Rajasoorya C, Holdaway IM, Wrightson P, Scott DJ, Ibbertson HK. Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly. Clin. Endocrinol. 1994;41:95–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb03789.x.
    1. Nachtigall L, Delgado A, Swearingen B, Lee H, Zerikly R, Klibanski A. Changing patterns in diagnosis and therapy of acromegaly over two decades. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:2035–2041. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2149.
    1. Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Siegel S, Kleist B, Kohlmann J, Starz D, Buslei R, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, Strasburger CJ, Buchfelder M. Diagnosis and management of acromegaly: the patient’s perspective. Pituitary. 2016;19:268–276. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0702-1.
    1. Reid TJ, Post KD, Bruce JN, Nabi Kanibir M, Reyes-Vidal CM, Freda PU. Features at diagnosis of 324 patients with acromegaly did not change from 1981 to 2006: acromegaly remains under-recognized and under-diagnosed. Clin. Endocrinol. 2010;72:203–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03626.x.
    1. Clemmons DR. Consensus statement on the standardization and evaluation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor assays. Clin. Chem. 2011;57:555–559. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.150631.
    1. Gurel MH, Bruening PR, Rhodes C, Lomax KG. Patient perspectives on the impact of acromegaly: results from individual and group interviews. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 2014;8:53–62.
    1. Brue T, Castinetti F. The risks of overlooking the diagnosis of secreting pituitary adenomas. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2016;11:135. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0516-x.
    1. Maione L, Brue T, Beckers A, Delemer B, Petrossians P, Borson-Chazot F, Chabre O, Francois P, Bertherat J, Cortet-Rudelli C, Chanson P, French Acromegaly Registry, G. Changes in the management and comorbidities of acromegaly over three decades: the French Acromegaly Registry. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2017;176:645–655. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-1064.
    1. Everitt BS. Multivariate analysis: the need for data, and other problems. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1975;126:237–240. doi: 10.1192/bjp.126.3.237.
    1. Comfrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course In Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
    1. Costello AB, Osbourne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2005;10:1–9.
    1. Sacco IC, Suda EY, Vigneron V, Sartor CD. An ‘Importance’ Map of Signs and Symptoms to Classify Diabetic Polyneuropathy: An Exploratory Data Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129763.
    1. Porter CK, Riddle MS, Alcala AN, Sack DA, Harro C, Chakraborty S, Gutierrez RL, Savarino SJ, Darsley M, McKenzie R, DeNearing B, Steinsland H, Tribble DR, Bourgeois AL. An evidenced-based scale of disease severity following human challenge with enteroxigenic Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149358.
    1. Sourial N, Wolfson C, Zhu B, Quail J, Fletcher J, Karunananthan S, Bandeen-Roche K, Beland F, Bergman H. Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010;63:638–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.008.
    1. Prencipe N, Floriani I, Guaraldi F, Di Giacomo SV, Cannavo S, Arnaldi G, Berton A, Torri V, Spinello M, Arvat E, Ghigo E, Grottoli S. ACROSCORE: a new and simple tool for the diagnosis of acromegaly, a rare and underdiagnosed disease. Clin. Endocrinol. 2016;84:380–385. doi: 10.1111/cen.12959.
    1. Danzig J. Acromegaly. BMJ. 2007;335:824–825. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Ezzat S, Forster MJ, Berchtold P, Redelmeier DA, Boerlin V, Harris AG. Acromegaly. Clinical and biochemical features in 500 patients. Medicine. 1994;73:233–240. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199409000-00001.
    1. Petrossians P, Daly AF, Natchev E, Maione L, Blijdorp K, Sahnoun-Fathallah M, Auriemma R, Diallo AM, Hulting AL, Ferone D, Hana V, Jr., Filipponi S, Sievers C, Nogueira C, Fajardo-Montanana C, Carvalho D, Hana V, Stalla GK, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Delemer B, Colao A, Brue T, Neggers S, Zacharieva S, Chanson P, Beckers A. Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liege Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2017;24:505–518. doi: 10.1530/ERC-17-0253.
    1. Tanaka S, Fukuda I, Hizuka N, Takano K. Gender differences in serum GH and IGF-I levels and the GH response to dynamic tests in patients with acromegaly. Endocr. J. 2010;57:477–483. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.K09E-342.

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever