Cross-sectional prevalence survey of intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization in Canadian military personnel

Mark A Zamorski, Miriam E Wiens-Kinkaid, Mark A Zamorski, Miriam E Wiens-Kinkaid

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent and is associated with a broad range of adverse consequences. In military organizations, IPV may have special implications, such as the potential of service-related mental disorders to trigger IPV. However, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) have limited data to guide their prevention and control efforts.

Methods: Self-reported IPV perpetration, victimization, and their correlates were assessed on a cross-sectional survey of a stratified random sample of currently-serving Canadian Regular Forces personnel (N = 2157). The four primary outcomes were perpetration or victimization of any physical and/or sexual or emotional and/or financial IPV over the lifespan of the current relationship.

Results: Among the 81% of the population in a current relationship, perpetration of any physical and/or sexual IPV was reported in 9%; victimization was reported in 15%. Any emotional and/or financial abuse was reported by 19% (perpetration) and 22% (victimization). Less physically injurious forms of abuse predominated. Logistic regression modelling showed that relationship dissatisfaction was independently associated with all four outcomes (OR range = 2.3 to 3.7). Probable depression was associated with all outcomes except physical and/or sexual IPV victimization (OR range = 2.5 - 2.7). PTSD symptoms were only associated with physical and/or sexual IPV perpetration (OR = 3.2, CI = 1.4 to 7.9). High-risk drinking was associated with emotional and/or financial abuse. Risk of IPV was lowest in those who had recent deployment experience; remote deployment experience (vs. never having deployed) was an independent risk factor for all IPV outcomes (OR range = 2.0 - 3.4).

Conclusions: IPV affects an important minority of military families; less severe cases predominate. Mental disorders, high-risk drinking, relationship dissatisfaction, and remote deployment were independently associated with abuse outcomes. The primary limitations of this analysis are its use of self-report data from military personnel (not their intimate partners) and the cross-sectional nature of the survey. Prevention efforts in the CAF need to target the full spectrum of IPV. Mental disorders, high-risk drinking, and relationship dissatisfaction are potential targets for risk reduction. Additional research is needed to understand the association of remote deployment with IPV.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mutuality of IPV in men and women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Co-existence of IPV types in perpetration and victimization.

References

    1. Heise L, Garcia-Moreno C. In: World report on violence and health. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R, editor. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Violence by intimate partners; pp. 87–122.
    1. Statistics Canada. Family violence in Canada: a statistical profile. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2011.
    1. Varcoe C, Hankivsky O, Ford-Gilboe M, Wuest J, Wilk P. Attributing selected costs to intimate partner violence in a sample of women who have left abusive partners: a social determinants of health approach. Canadia Public Policy. 2011;37:359–380. doi: 10.3138/cpp.37.3.359.
    1. Wood SL, Sommers MS. Consequences of intimate partner violence on child witnesses: a systematic review of the literature. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2011;24:223–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2011.00302.x.
    1. World Health Organization & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Bell KM, Orcutt HK. Posttraumatic stress disorder and male-perpetrated intimate partner violence. JAMA. 2009;302:562–564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1126.
    1. Marshall AD, Panuzio J, Taft CT. Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25:862–876. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.009.
    1. Rentz ED, Martin SL, Gibbs DA, Clinton-Sherrod M, Hardison J, Marshall SW. Family violence in the military: a review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2006;7:93–108. doi: 10.1177/1524838005285916.
    1. Zamorski MA. Report of the Canadian Forces Expert Panel on the Prevention of Family Violence. Ottawa: Department of National Defence; 2013.
    1. Bray RM, Pemberton MR, Hourani LL. 2008 Department of Defense (US) Survey of Health Related Behaviors. NC: Research Triangle Park; 2009.
    1. Fear NT, Iversen A, Meltzer H, Workman L, Hull L, Greenberg N, Barker C, Browne T, Earnshaw M, Horn O. et al.Patterns of drinking in the UK Armed Forces. Addiction. 2007;102:1749–1759. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01978.x.
    1. Department of National Defence. 2008/2009 Health and Lifestyle Information Survey. Ottawa, ON: Regular Forces report; 2010.
    1. American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Military Deployment Services for Youth Families and Service Members. The psychological needs of U.S. military service members and their families: a preliminary report. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2007.
    1. Alysha D. Intimate partner violence in military couples: a review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17:147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.12.002.
    1. Adelman M. The military, militarism, and the militarization of domestic violence. Violence Against Women. 2003;9:1118–1152. doi: 10.1177/1077801203255292.
    1. Heyman RE, Neidig PH. A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. Army and civilian representative samples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:239–242.
    1. Reeves C, O’Leary-Kelly AM. The effects and costs of intimate partner violence for work organizations. J Interpers Violence. 2007;22:327–344. doi: 10.1177/0886260506295382.
    1. Reed E, Silverman JG, Raj A, Rothman EF, Decker MR, Gottlieb BR, Molnar BE, Miller E. Social and environmental contexts of adolescent and young adult male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: a qualitative study. Am J Mens Health. 2008;2:260–271. doi: 10.1177/1557988308318863.
    1. Bell NS. Health and occupational consequences of spouse abuse victimization among male U.S. Army soldiers. J Interpers Violence. 2009;24:751–769.
    1. Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Rivara FP, Thompson RS. Health care utilization and costs associated with physical and nonphysical-only intimate partner violence. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:1052–1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00955.x.
    1. Smith TC, Ryan MA, Wingard DL, Slymen DJ, Sallis JF, Kritz-Silverstein D. New onset and persistent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder self reported after deployment and combat exposures: prospective population based US military cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336:366–371. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Adler AB, Bliese PD, McGurk D, Hoge CW, Castro CA. Battlemind debriefing and Battlemind training as early interventions with soldiers returning from Iraq: Randomization by platoon. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77:928–940.
    1. McCarroll JE, Ursano RJ, Liu X, Thayer LE, Newby JH, Norwood AE, Fullerton CS. Deployment and the probability of spousal aggression by U.S. Army soldiers. Mil Med. 2000;165:41–44.
    1. Newby JH, Ursano RJ, McCarroll JE, Liu X, Fullerton CS, Norwood AE. Postdeployment domestic violence by U.S. Army soldiers. Mil Med. 2005;170:643–647.
    1. McCarroll JE, Ursano RJ, Newby JH, Liu X, Fullerton CS, Norwood AE, Osuch EA. Domestic violence and deployment in US Army soldiers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003;191:3–9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200301000-00002.
    1. Rodgers K. Wife assault: the findings of a national survey. Juristat. 1994;14:1–21.
    1. Context and consequences of domestic violence against men and women in Canada in 2004. ]
    1. Straus MA. In: Encyclopedia of domestic violence. Jackson NA, editor. New York: Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group; 2007. Conflict tactics scales; pp. 190–197.
    1. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek DK, Ustun TB, Wittchen HU. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF) Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1998;7:171–185. doi: 10.1002/mpr.47.
    1. Prins A, Ouimette P, Kimerling R, Cameron RP, Hugelshofer DS, Shaw-Hegwer J, Thrallkill A, Gusman FD, Sheikh JI. The primary care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): development and operative characteristics. Prim Care Psychiatry. 2003;9:9–14.
    1. Bohn MJ, Babor TF, Kranzler HR. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56:423–432.
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Stanley SM, Allen ES, Markman HJ, Saiz CC, Bloomstrom G, Thomas R, Schumm WR, Bailey AE. Dissemination and evaluation of marriage education in the Army. Fam Process. 2005;44:187–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00053.x.
    1. Archer KJ, Lemeshow S. Goodness-of-fit test for a logistic regression model fitted using survey sample data. STATA Journal. 2006;6:97–105.
    1. STATA FAQ. How can I check for collinearity in survey regression? ]
    1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, Chen J, Stevens MR. The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
    1. Foran HM, Slep AM, Heyman RE. Prevalences of intimate partner violence in a representative U.S. Air Force sample. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79:391–397.
    1. Slep AM, Foran HM, Heyman RE, Snarr JD. Unique risk and protective factors for partner aggression in a large scale air force survey. J Community Health. 2010;35:375–383. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9264-3.
    1. Afifi TO, MacMillan H, Cox BJ, Asmundson GJ, Stein MB, Sareen J. Mental health correlates of intimate partner violence in marital relationships in a nationally representative sample of males and females. J Interpers Violence. 2009;24:1398–1417. doi: 10.1177/0886260508322192.
    1. Edwards VJ, Black MC, Dhingra S, Knight-Eily L, Perry GS. Physical and sexual intimate partner violence and reported serious psychological distress in the 2007 BRFSS. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(Suppl 1):37–42.
    1. Monson CM, Taft CT, Fredman SJ. Military-related PTSD and intimate relationships: from description to theory-driven research and intervention development. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:707–714. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.09.002.
    1. Taft CT, Pless AP, Stalans LJ, Koenen KC, King LA, King DW. Risk factors for partner violence among a national sample of combat veterans. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:151–159.
    1. Taft CT, Vogt DS, Marshall AD, Panuzio J, Niles BL. Aggression among combat veterans: relationships with combat exposure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, dysphoria, and anxiety. J Trauma Stress. 2007;20:135–145. doi: 10.1002/jts.20197.
    1. Taft CT, Kaloupek DG, Schumm JA, Marshall AD, Panuzio J, King DW, Keane TM. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, physiological reactivity, alcohol problems, and aggression among military veterans. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116:498–507.
    1. Taft CT, Street AE, Marshall AD, Dowdall DJ, Riggs DS. Posttraumatic stress disorder, anger, and partner abuse among Vietnam combat veterans. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21:270–277.
    1. Taft CT, Weatherill RP, Woodward HE, Pinto LA, Watkins LE, Miller MW, Dekel R. Intimate partner and general aggression perpetration among combat veterans presenting to a posttraumatic stress disorder clinic. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2009;79:461–468.
    1. Teten AL, Schumacher JA, Taft CT, Stanley MA, Kent TA, Bailey SD, Dunn NJ, White DL. Intimate partner aggression perpetrated and sustained by male Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25:1612–1630. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354583.
    1. Pan HS, Neidig PH, O’Leary KD. Predicting mild and severe husband-to-wife physical aggression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:975–981.
    1. Rosen LN, Kaminski RJ, Parmley AM, Knudson KH, Fancher P. The effects of peer group climate on intimate partner violence among married male U.S. Army soldiers. Violence Against Women. 2003;9:1045–1071. doi: 10.1177/1077801203255504.
    1. Foran HM, O’Leary KD. Alcohol and intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28:1222–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.05.001.
    1. Fonseca CA, Schmaling KB, Stoever C, Gutierrez C, Blume AW, Russell ML. Variables associated with intimate partner violence in a deploying military sample. Mil Med. 2006;171:627–631.
    1. Johnson MP. Langhinrichsen-Rolling’s confirmation of the feminist analysis of intimate partner violence: comment on “Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States”. Sex Roles. 2010;62:212–219. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9697-2.
    1. Johnson MP. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1995;57:283–294. doi: 10.2307/353683.
    1. Langhinrichsen-Rohling J. Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles. 2010;62:179–193. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9628-2.
    1. Adler AB, Zamorski MA, Britt TW. In: Deployment Psychology: Evidence-based Strategies to Promote Mental Health in the Military. Adler AB, Bliese PD, Castro CA, editor. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010. The psychology of transition: adapting to home after deployment; pp. 153–174.
    1. Sareen J, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, Stein MB, Belik SL, Meadows G, Asmundson GJ. Combat and peacekeeping operations in relation to prevalence of mental disorders and perceived need for mental health care: findings from a large representative sample of military personnel. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:843–852. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.843.
    1. Public attitudes towards family violence: a syndicated study (final report) ]
    1. Dunford FW. The San Diego Navy experiment: an assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:468–476.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever