Laparoscopic surgery skills evaluation: analysis based on accelerometers

Alexis Sánchez, Omaira Rodríguez, Renata Sánchez, Gustavo Benítez, Romina Pena, Oriana Salamo, Valentina Baez, Alexis Sánchez, Omaira Rodríguez, Renata Sánchez, Gustavo Benítez, Romina Pena, Oriana Salamo, Valentina Baez

Abstract

Background and objective: Technical skills assessment is considered an important part of surgical training. Subjective assessment is not appropriate for training feedback, and there is now increased demand for objective assessment of surgical performance. Economy of movement has been proposed as an excellent alternative for this purpose. The investigators describe a readily available method to evaluate surgical skills through motion analysis using accelerometers in Apple's iPod Touch device.

Methods: Two groups of individuals with different minimally invasive surgery skill levels (experts and novices) were evaluated. Each group was asked to perform a given task with an iPod Touch placed on the dominant-hand wrist. The Accelerometer Data Pro application makes it possible to obtain movement-related data detected by the accelerometers. Average acceleration and maximum acceleration for each axis (x, y, and z) were determined and compared.

Results: The analysis of average acceleration and maximum acceleration showed statistically significant differences between groups on both the y (P = .04, P = .03) and z (P = .04, P = .04) axes. This demonstrates the ability to distinguish between experts and novices. The analysis of the x axis showed no significant differences between groups, which could be explained by the fact that the task involves few movements on this axis.

Conclusion: Accelerometer-based motion analysis is a useful tool to evaluate laparoscopic skill development of surgeons and should be used in training programs. Validation of this device in an in vivo setting is a research goal of the investigators' team.

Keywords: Accelerometers; Evaluation; Laparoscopic surgery; Training; iPod Touch.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration 4-task training model: task 3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The iPod Touch 4G device on the surgeon's dominant-hand wrist.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Acceleration patterns in a determined axis, showing differences between novices and experts.

References

    1. Sánchez A, Rodríguez O, Bellorín O, Sánchez R, Benítez G. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with gallstones and choledocholithiasis. JSLS. 2010;14(2):246–50.
    1. Sánchez-Ismayel A, Cruz-González G, Sánchez R, et al. Manejo laparoscópico de las anomalías sintomáticas del uraco. Actas Urol Esp. 2009;33(3):284–9.
    1. Tsuda S, Scott D. Surgical skills training and simulation. Curr Probl Surg. 2009;46(4):271–370.
    1. Roberts K, Bell R, Duffy A. Evolution of surgical skills training. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(20):3219–24.
    1. Bridges M, Diamond D. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg. 1999;177(1):28–32.
    1. Figert P, Park A, Witzke D, Schwartz R. Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(5):533–7.
    1. Smith S, Torkington J, Brown T, Taffinder N, Darzi A. Motion analysis. A tool for assessing laparoscopic dexterity in the performance of a laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(4):640–5.
    1. Mason J, Ansell J, Warren N, Torkington J. Is motion analysis a valid tool for assessing laparoscopic skill? Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1468–77.
    1. Vassiliou M, Feldman L, Andrew C, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):107–13.
    1. Reiley C, Lin H, Yuh D, Hager G. Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):356–66.
    1. Oropesa I, Sánchez-González P, Chmarra M, et al. EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on endoscopic video analysis for psychomotor skills assessment. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):1029–39.
    1. Sánchez A, Otaño N, Rodríguez O, Sánchez R, Benítez G, Schwitzer M. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration four task training model: construct validity. JSLS. 2012;16(1):10–5.
    1. Chang L, Petros J, Hess D, Rotondi C, Babineau T. Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(3):418–21.
    1. Rodríguez O, Sánchez A, Sánchez R, Pena R, Salamo O. Construct validity for an inanimate training model for laparoscopic appendectomy. JSLS. 2013;17(3):445–9.
    1. Fried G, Feldman L. Objective assessment of technical performance. World J Surg. 2008;32(2):156–60.
    1. Chmarra M, Grimbergen C, Dankelman J. System for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(6):328–40.
    1. Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A. The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(5):479–85.
    1. Rosen J, Brown J, Barreca M, Chang L, Hannaford B, Sinanan M. The Blue Dragon—a system for monitoring the kinematics and dynamics of endoscopic tools in minimally invasive surgery for objective laparoscopic skill assessment. Stud Health Tech Inform. 2002;85:412–8.
    1. Cristancho S, Hodgson A, Panton O, Meneghetti A, Warnock G, Qayumi K. Intraoperative monitoring of laparoscopic skill development base don quantitative measures. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(10):2181–90.
    1. Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D, Kenmotsu H, et al. Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):771–5.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever