Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for Pain Management: Rationale, Methods, Current Literature, and Theoretical Mechanisms

King Hei Stanley Lam, Chen-Yu Hung, Yi-Pin Chiang, Kentaro Onishi, Daniel Chiung Jui Su, Thomas B Clark, K Dean Reeves, King Hei Stanley Lam, Chen-Yu Hung, Yi-Pin Chiang, Kentaro Onishi, Daniel Chiung Jui Su, Thomas B Clark, K Dean Reeves

Abstract

Nerve hydrodissection (HD), a technique used when treating nerve entrapments, involves the injection of an anesthetic, saline, or 5% dextrose in water to separate the nerve from the surrounding tissue, fascia, or adjacent structures. Animal models suggest the potential for minimal compression to initiate and perpetuate neuropathic pain. Mechanical benefits of HD may relate to release of nervi nervorum or vasa nervorum compression. Pathologic nerves can be identified by examination or ultrasound visualization. The in-plane technique is the predominant and safest method for nerve HD. Five percent dextrose may be favored as the preferred injectate based on preliminary comparative-injectate literature, but additional research is critical. Literature-based hypotheses for a direct ameliorative effect of dextrose HD on neuropathic pain are presented.

Keywords: nerve hydrodissection; neuropathic pain; pain management; ultrasonography.

Conflict of interest statement

Some of the materials and pictures contained in this manuscript have been used in previous presentations during international academic conferences. The most recent one was the Annual Conference of the Australian Association of Musculoskeletal Medicine on 24–27 October 2019 in Brisbane, Australia. The previous one was the International Symposium of Ultrasound for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISURA 2019) on 9–11 May 2019 in Porto, Portugal. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2020 Lam et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the “nervi nervorum” and “vasa nervorum” outside the epineurium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of two examples of abnormal nerves. The nerve on the left side has part of the nerve with the whole cross-sectional area (CSA) double, or even more, than normal, but the fascicles of the nerve are relatively normal. The nerve on the right side shows the CSA of the nerve is normal or slightly enlarged but one or more of the fascicles inside the nerve is much larger. The needles in this illustration will be referred to later to illustrate how method 1 can be used to hydrodissect two parallel nerves (such as tibial and fibular nerves at popliteal fossae).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A normal left common fibular nerve (CFN) with a cross-sectional area (CSA) at the upper limits of normal (11 mm2) at fibular head (A and B)., 3a is the original ultrasound image, (B) Shows the highlighted CSA of the normal left CFN and the color shadings with labels for sonoanatomy, Image is courtesy of 3D4Medical’s Essential Anatomy 5 app. Abbreviations: BF, biceps femoris; Gastroc, gastrocnemius; LSCN, lateral sural cutaneous nerve; PA, popliteal artery; SN, sural nerve; TN, tibial nerve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
An abnormal right common fibular nerve (CFN) with twice the normal CSA (22 mm2) at the fibular head (A, B) of the same patient in Figure 3., 4a is the original ultrasound image. The (B) shows the CSA of the abnormal right CFN and the color shadings with labels for sonoanatomy, Image is courtesy of 3D4Medical’s Essential Anatomy 5 app. Abbreviations: BF, biceps femoris; Gastroc, gastrocnemius; LSCN, lateral sural cutaneous nerve; PA, popliteal artery; SN, sural nerve; TN, tibial nerve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Shows a normal common fibular nerve (CFN) at fibular head of Figure 3 with normal fascicles, the most prominent fascicle at the upper limit of normal (1 mm2) in cross-sectional area. The color shading in (B) with labeling are for illustration purpose. Image is courtesy of 3D4Medical’s Essential Anatomy 5 app Abbreviations: BF, biceps femoris; Gastroc, gastrocnemius; LSCN, lateral sural cutaneous nerve.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Illustrates a swollen common fibular nerve (CFN) at fibular head of Figure 4 with a swollen nerve fascicle with a cross-sectional area of 3 mm2. The color shading in (B) with labeling are for illustration purpose. Image is courtesy of 3D4Medical’s Essential Anatomy 5 app Abbreviations: BF, biceps femoris; Gastroc, gastrocnemius; LSCN, lateral sural cutaneous nerve.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Needle position for method 1 of hydrodissection (HD) of nerves. With the “in-plane” technique, first, the inferior surface of the nerve is hydrodissected with the needle bevel positioned up; and thereafter, the superior surface of the nerve is hydrodissected with the needle bevel positioned down.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Effect of bevel position on the direction of tracking of the needle. (A) Effects of bevel position up and (B) effects of bevel position down.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Sequence of hydrodissection (HD) of the diseased nerve using method 1. First, HD is initiated from the site where the nerve is most severely damaged or trapped, thereafter, using the same needle entry point, pivot the probe and the needle to the more proximal and/or distal part of the nerve and repeat the HD.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Relative direction and movement of the needle when using method 2 for hydrodissection (HD) of nerves. This shows the initial out-of-plane portion of method 2 with HD of the nerve on either side until injectate is seen surrounding the nerve, at which point the probe position is changed to in-plane with the nerve to HD the space above the nerve.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/7414936/bin/JPR-13-1957-g0001.jpg

References

    1. Wu Y-T, Ho T-Y, Chou Y-C, et al. Six-month efficacy of perineural dextrose for carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(8):1179–1189. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025
    1. Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(4):601–610. doi:10.1002/ana.25332
    1. Wu YT, Chen SR, Li TY, et al. Nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Muscle Nerve. 2019;59(2):174–180. doi:10.1002/mus.26358
    1. Wu Y-T, Ho T-Y, Chou Y-C, et al. Six-month efficacy of platelet-rich plasma for carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized, single-blind controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):94. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00224-6
    1. Malone DGCTB, Wei N. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous injection, hydrodissection, and fenestration for carpal tunnel syndrome: description of a new technique. J Appl Res. 2010;10(3):107–114.
    1. McShane JM, Slaff S, Gold JE, Nazarian LN. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle release of the carpal tunnel for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: preliminary report. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(9):1341–1349. doi:10.7863/jum.2012.31.9.1341
    1. Elawamy A, Hassanien M, Hamed A, et al. Efficacy of hyalase hydrodissection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, clinical trial. Pain Physician. 2020;23(2):E175–E183.
    1. Shen YP, Li TY, Chou YC, et al. Comparison of perineural platelet-rich plasma and dextrose injections for moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized, single-blind, head-to-head comparative trial. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(11):2009–2017. doi:10.1002/term.2950
    1. Lam SKH, Reeves KD, Cheng AL. Transition from deep regional blocks toward deep nerve hydrodissection in the upper body and torso: method description and results from a retrospective chart review of the analgesic effect of 5% dextrose water as the primary hydrodissection injectate to enhance safety. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7920438.
    1. Cass SP. Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection: what is it? A review of the literature. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2016;15(1):20–22. doi:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000226
    1. Andreone BJ, Lacoste B, Gu C. Neuronal and vascular interactions. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015;38(1):25–46. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033835
    1. Bennett GJ, Xie YK. A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man. Pain. 1988;33(1):87–107. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90209-6
    1. Bennett GJCJ, Honore M, Seltzer Z. Models of neuropathic pain in the rat. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2003;22(1):9–14.
    1. Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, et al. Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain. 2016;157(8):1599–1606. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492
    1. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology. 2008;70(18):1630–1635. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000282763.29778.59
    1. Bradshaw JM. Lecture on nerve-stretching for the relief or cure of pain. Br Med J. 1883;2(1198):1173–1179. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.1198.1173
    1. Sugar OVH. Victor Horsley, John Marshall, nerve stretching, and the nervi nervorum. Surg Neurol. 1990;34(3):184–187. doi:10.1016/0090-3019(90)90071-V
    1. Victor H. Preliminary communication on the existence of sensory nerves in nerve trunks. True “nervi nervorum”. Br Med J. 1884;1:166.
    1. Carrero G, Moon JK. Fascicular anatomy, nervi nervorum, and paresthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;1:72–73.
    1. Vilensky JAGS, Gilman S, Casey K. Sir Victor Horsley, Mr John Marshall, the nervi nervorum, and pain: more than a century ahead of their time. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(3):499–501. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.3.499
    1. Mizisin APWA, Weerasuriya A. Homeostatic regulation of the endoneurial microenvironment during development, aging and in response to trauma, disease and toxic insult. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121(3):291–312. doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0783-x
    1. Yali Jia TKB, Wang RK. Label-free 3D optical microangiography imaging of functional vasa nervorum and peripheral microvascular tree in the hind limb of diabetic mice. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2010;13(4):307–313.
    1. Felten DLSMM. Peripheral Nervous System. Netter’s Atlas of Neuroscience (Third Edition). 2016:153–231. Elsevier.
    1. Kim JY, Song S, Park HJ, Rhee WI, Won SJ. Diagnostic cutoff value for ultrasonography of the common fibular neuropathy at the fibular head. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(6):1057–1063. doi:10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.1057
    1. Bedewi MA, Abodonya A, Kotb M, et al. Estimation of ultrasound reference values for the lower limb peripheral nerves in adults: a cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2018;97(12):e0179. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010179
    1. Lam SKH, Hung C-Y, Clark TB. Loss of the “Seesaw Sign” of the sciatic nerve in a marathon runner complaining of hamstring cramping. Pain Med. 2020;21(2):e247–e248. doi:10.1093/pm/pnz283
    1. Soneji N, Peng PW. Ultrasound-guided pain interventions – a review of techniques for peripheral nerves. Korean J Pain. 2013;26(2):111–124. doi:10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.111
    1. Misra S, Reed KB, Schafer BW, Ramesh KT, Okamura AM. Mechanics of flexible needles robotically steered through soft tissue. Int J Rob Res. 2010;29(13):1640–1660. doi:10.1177/0278364910369714
    1. Jeng CL, Torrillo TM, Rosenblatt MA. Complications of peripheral nerve blocks. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(Suppl 1):i97–107. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq273
    1. Tran TA, Williams LM, Bui D, Anthonisen C, Poltavskiy E, Szabo RM. Prospective pilot study comparing pre- and postsurgical CTSAQ and neuro-QoL questionnaire with median nerve high-resolution ultrasound cross-sectional areas. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(2):184e181–184 e189. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.015
    1. Raeissadat SA, Karimzadeh A, Hashemi M, Bagherzadeh L. Safety and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome; a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):49. doi:10.1186/s12891-018-1963-4
    1. Senna MK, Shaat RM, Ali AAA. Platelet-rich plasma in treatment of patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(12):3643–3654. doi:10.1007/s10067-019-04719-7
    1. Catapano MCJ, Borschel G, Alavinia SM, Robinson LR, Mittal N. Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasm injections for nonsurgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:897–906. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.193
    1. Liza Maniquis-Smigel KDR, Rosen HJ, Lyftogt J, Graham-Coleman C, Cheng A-L, Rabago. D. Analgesic effect of caudal 5% dextrose in water in chronic low back pain. A randomized controlled trial of epidural injection. Anesth Pain Med. 2016.
    1. Maniquis-Smigel L, Reeves KD, Rosen HJ, et al. Analgesic effect and potential cumulative benefit from caudal epidural D5W in consecutive participants with chronic low-back and buttock/leg pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(12):1189–1196. doi:10.1089/acm.2018.0085
    1. Malek N, Pajak A, Kolosowska N, Kucharczyk M, Starowicz K. The importance of TRPV1-sensitisation factors for the development of neuropathic pain. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015;65(Mar):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2015.02.001
    1. Szolcsányi JLSZ, Sándor Z. Multisteric TRPV1 nocisensor: a target for analgesics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33(12):646–655. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2012.09.002
    1. Bertrand H, Kyriazis M, Reeves KD, Lyftogt J, Rabago D. Topical mannitol reduces capsaicin-induced pain: results of a pilot-level, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. PM R. 2015;7(11):1111–1117. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.05.002
    1. Fujita SBM, Bohland M, Watts G, Watts AG, Donovan CM. Hypoglycemic detection at the portal vein is mediated by capsaicin-sensitive primary sensory neurons. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;293(1):96–101. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00415.2006
    1. MacIver MB, Tanelian DL. Activation of C fibers by metabolic perturbations associated with tourniquet ischemia. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(4):617–623. doi:10.1097/00000542-199204000-00020
    1. Evers S, Thoreson AR, Smith J, Zhao C, Geske JR, Amadio PC. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection decreases gliding resistance of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel. Muscle Nerve. 2018;57(1):25–32. doi:10.1002/mus.25723

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever