Cost-effectiveness of adding a non-invasive acoustic rule-out test in the evaluation of patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease: rationale and design of the prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel-group multicenter FILTER-SCAD trial

Louise Hougesen Bjerking, Kim Wadt Hansen, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jens Brønnum-Schou, Henrik Engblom, David Erlinge, Sune Ammentorp Haahr-Pedersen, Merete Heitmann, Jens Dahlgaard Hove, Magnus Thorsten Jensen, Marie Kruse, Sune Räder, Søren Strange, Søren Galatius, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott, Louise Hougesen Bjerking, Kim Wadt Hansen, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jens Brønnum-Schou, Henrik Engblom, David Erlinge, Sune Ammentorp Haahr-Pedersen, Merete Heitmann, Jens Dahlgaard Hove, Magnus Thorsten Jensen, Marie Kruse, Sune Räder, Søren Strange, Søren Galatius, Eva Irene Bossano Prescott

Abstract

Introduction: Most patients with symptoms suggestive of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and better selection of patients to be referred for diagnostic tests is needed. The CAD-score is a non-invasive acoustic measure that, when added to pretest probability of CAD, has shown good rule-out capabilities. We aimed to test whether implementation of CAD-score in clinical practice reduces the use of diagnostic tests without increasing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates in patients with suspected CCS.

Methods and analysis: FILTER-SCAD is a randomised, controlled, multicenter trial aiming to include 2000 subjects aged ≥30 years without known CAD referred for outpatient assessment for symptoms suggestive of CCS. Subjects are randomised 1:1 to either the control group: standard diagnostic examination (SDE) according to the current guidelines, or the intervention group: SDE plus a CAD-score. The subjects are followed for 12 months for the primary endpoint of cumulative number of diagnostic tests and a safety endpoint (MACE). Angina symptoms, quality of life and risk factor modification will be assessed with questionnaires at baseline, 3 months and 12 months after randomisation. The study is powered to detect superiority in terms of a reduction of ≥15% in the primary endpoint between the two groups with a power of 80%, and non-inferiority on the secondary endpoint with a power of 90%. The significance level is 0.05. The non-inferiority margin is set to 1.5%. Randomisation began on October 2019. Follow-up is planned to be completed by December 2022.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Danish Medical Agency (2019024326), Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics (H-19012579) and Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2019-04252). All patients participating in the study will sign an informed consent. All study results will be attempted to be published as soon as possible.

Trial registration number: NCT04121949; Pre-results.

Keywords: cardiology; coronary heart disease; ischaemic heart disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LHB, KWH, JB-S, HE, SAH-P, MH, JDH, MK, MTJ, SR, SS, SG and EP: None. TB-S: Steering Committee member of the Amgen financed GALACTIC-HF trial; Advisory Board: Sanofi Pasteur; Advisory Board: Amgen; Speaker Honorarium: Novartis; Speaker Honorarium: Sanofi Pasteur; Research grant: GE Healthcare; Research grant: Sanofi Pasteur. DE: Advisory board for Acarix A/S.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. CAD, coronary artery disease; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NIT, non-invasive test; QoL, quality of life; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire; SDE, Standard diagnostic examination.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart. CAD, coronary artery disease; ICA, invasive coronary angiography; NIT, non-invasive tests; PTP, pretest probability.

References

    1. Jordan KP, Timmis A, Croft P, et al. . Prognosis of undiagnosed chest pain: linked electronic health record cohort study. BMJ 2017;357:j1194. 10.1136/bmj.j1194
    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. . 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
    1. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. . 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:e44–164. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013
    1. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350–8. 10.1056/NEJM197906143002402
    1. Genders TSS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H, et al. . A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1316–30. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr014
    1. Reeh J, Therming CB, Heitmann M, et al. . Prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease and prognosis in patients with suspected stable angina. Eur Heart J 2019;40:1426–35. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy806
    1. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al. . Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1291–300. 10.1056/NEJMoa1415516
    1. Winther S, Nissen L, Westra J, et al. . Pre-Test probability prediction in patients with a low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease: a prospective study with a fractional flow reserve endpoint. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;20:1208–18. 10.1093/ehjci/jez058
    1. Winther S, Schmidt SE, Holm NR, et al. . Diagnosing coronary artery disease by sound analysis from coronary stenosis induced turbulent blood flow: diagnostic performance in patients with stable angina pectoris. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;32:235–45. 10.1007/s10554-015-0753-4
    1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019) . CADScor system for ruling out coronary artery disease in people with symptoms of stable coronary artery disease (NICE Medtech innovation briefing 174), 2019. Available:
    1. Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. . 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949–3003. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
    1. Schmidt SE, Winther S, Larsen BS, et al. . Coronary artery disease risk reclassification by a new acoustic-based score. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;35:2019–28. 10.1007/s10554-019-01662-1
    1. Winther S, Nissen L, Schmidt SE, et al. . Diagnostic performance of an acoustic-based system for coronary artery disease risk stratification. Heart 2018;104:928–35. 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311944
    1. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, et al. . Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programme. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
    1. Hicks KA, Tcheng JE, Bozkurt B, et al. . 2014 ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for cardiovascular endpoint events in clinical trials: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task force on clinical data standards (writing Committee to develop cardiovascular endpoints data standards). J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:403–69. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.018
    1. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. . Development and evaluation of the Seattle angina questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:333–41. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9
    1. Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, et al. . Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1717–27. 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4
    1. Laursen UB, Rosenkilde LB, Haugaard A-M, et al. . Validation of the HeartDiet questionnaire. Dan Med J 2018;65.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. . The REDCap Consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
    1. Schmidt SE, Winther S, Boettcher M. Coronary artery disease risk reclassification using an acoustic-based score in view of the new European Society of cardiology 2019 guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;36:383–4. 10.1007/s10554-019-01746-y
    1. SCOT-HEART Investigators, Newby DE, Adamson PD, et al. . Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2018;379:924–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1805971
    1. Fordyce CB, Douglas PS, Roberts RS, et al. . Identification of patients with stable chest pain deriving minimal value from noninvasive testing: the promise Minimal-Risk tool, a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:400–8. 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5501
    1. Olesen K, Botker H, Sørensen H. Ten-Year cardiovascular risk in patients with stable angina pectoris but without coronary artery disease by coronary angiography. European Heart Journal 2020;41:ehaa946–1306.
    1. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. . Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa070829
    1. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. . Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362:886–95. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907272
    1. Patel MR, Dai D, Hernandez AF, et al. . Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice. Am Heart J 2014;167:846–52. 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.001
    1. Therming C, Galatius S, Heitmann M, et al. . Low diagnostic yield of non-invasive testing in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results from a large unselected hospital-based sample. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2018;4:301–8. 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx048

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever